Effect of an inverted seated position with upper arm blood flow restriction on measures of elbow flexors neuromuscular performance.

<h4>Purpose</h4>The objective of the investigation was to determine the concomitant effects of upper arm blood flow restriction (BFR) and inversion on elbow flexors neuromuscular responses.<h4>Methods</h4>Randomly allocated, 13 volunteers performed four conditions in a within...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamid Ahmadi, Nehara Herat, Shahab Alizadeh, Duane C Button, Urs Granacher, David G Behm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245311
id doaj-77180c2b37e0401dbe47e96ce9dd0ad9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-77180c2b37e0401dbe47e96ce9dd0ad92021-05-30T04:30:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e024531110.1371/journal.pone.0245311Effect of an inverted seated position with upper arm blood flow restriction on measures of elbow flexors neuromuscular performance.Hamid AhmadiNehara HeratShahab AlizadehDuane C ButtonUrs GranacherDavid G Behm<h4>Purpose</h4>The objective of the investigation was to determine the concomitant effects of upper arm blood flow restriction (BFR) and inversion on elbow flexors neuromuscular responses.<h4>Methods</h4>Randomly allocated, 13 volunteers performed four conditions in a within-subject design: rest (control, 1-min upright position without BFR), control (1-min upright with BFR), 1-min inverted (without BFR), and 1-min inverted with BFR. Evoked and voluntary contractile properties, before, during and after a 30-s maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) exercise intervention were examined as well as pain scale.<h4>Results</h4>Inversion induced significant pre-exercise intervention decreases in elbow flexors MVC (21.1%, [Formula: see text] = 0.48, p = 0.02) and resting evoked twitch forces (29.4%, [Formula: see text] = 0.34, p = 0.03). The 30-s MVC induced significantly greater pre- to post-test decreases in potentiated twitch force ([Formula: see text] = 0.61, p = 0.0009) during inversion (↓75%) than upright (↓65.3%) conditions. Overall, BFR decreased MVC force 4.8% ([Formula: see text] = 0.37, p = 0.05). For upright position, BFR induced 21.0% reductions in M-wave amplitude ([Formula: see text] = 0.44, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences for electromyographic activity or voluntary activation as measured with the interpolated twitch technique. For all conditions, there was a significant increase in pain scale between the 40-60 s intervals and post-30-s MVC (upright<inversion, and without BFR<BFR).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The concomitant application of inversion with elbow flexors BFR only amplified neuromuscular performance impairments to a small degree. Individuals who execute forceful contractions when inverted or with BFR should be cognizant that force output may be impaired.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245311
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hamid Ahmadi
Nehara Herat
Shahab Alizadeh
Duane C Button
Urs Granacher
David G Behm
spellingShingle Hamid Ahmadi
Nehara Herat
Shahab Alizadeh
Duane C Button
Urs Granacher
David G Behm
Effect of an inverted seated position with upper arm blood flow restriction on measures of elbow flexors neuromuscular performance.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Hamid Ahmadi
Nehara Herat
Shahab Alizadeh
Duane C Button
Urs Granacher
David G Behm
author_sort Hamid Ahmadi
title Effect of an inverted seated position with upper arm blood flow restriction on measures of elbow flexors neuromuscular performance.
title_short Effect of an inverted seated position with upper arm blood flow restriction on measures of elbow flexors neuromuscular performance.
title_full Effect of an inverted seated position with upper arm blood flow restriction on measures of elbow flexors neuromuscular performance.
title_fullStr Effect of an inverted seated position with upper arm blood flow restriction on measures of elbow flexors neuromuscular performance.
title_full_unstemmed Effect of an inverted seated position with upper arm blood flow restriction on measures of elbow flexors neuromuscular performance.
title_sort effect of an inverted seated position with upper arm blood flow restriction on measures of elbow flexors neuromuscular performance.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description <h4>Purpose</h4>The objective of the investigation was to determine the concomitant effects of upper arm blood flow restriction (BFR) and inversion on elbow flexors neuromuscular responses.<h4>Methods</h4>Randomly allocated, 13 volunteers performed four conditions in a within-subject design: rest (control, 1-min upright position without BFR), control (1-min upright with BFR), 1-min inverted (without BFR), and 1-min inverted with BFR. Evoked and voluntary contractile properties, before, during and after a 30-s maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) exercise intervention were examined as well as pain scale.<h4>Results</h4>Inversion induced significant pre-exercise intervention decreases in elbow flexors MVC (21.1%, [Formula: see text] = 0.48, p = 0.02) and resting evoked twitch forces (29.4%, [Formula: see text] = 0.34, p = 0.03). The 30-s MVC induced significantly greater pre- to post-test decreases in potentiated twitch force ([Formula: see text] = 0.61, p = 0.0009) during inversion (↓75%) than upright (↓65.3%) conditions. Overall, BFR decreased MVC force 4.8% ([Formula: see text] = 0.37, p = 0.05). For upright position, BFR induced 21.0% reductions in M-wave amplitude ([Formula: see text] = 0.44, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences for electromyographic activity or voluntary activation as measured with the interpolated twitch technique. For all conditions, there was a significant increase in pain scale between the 40-60 s intervals and post-30-s MVC (upright<inversion, and without BFR<BFR).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The concomitant application of inversion with elbow flexors BFR only amplified neuromuscular performance impairments to a small degree. Individuals who execute forceful contractions when inverted or with BFR should be cognizant that force output may be impaired.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245311
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidahmadi effectofaninvertedseatedpositionwithupperarmbloodflowrestrictiononmeasuresofelbowflexorsneuromuscularperformance
AT neharaherat effectofaninvertedseatedpositionwithupperarmbloodflowrestrictiononmeasuresofelbowflexorsneuromuscularperformance
AT shahabalizadeh effectofaninvertedseatedpositionwithupperarmbloodflowrestrictiononmeasuresofelbowflexorsneuromuscularperformance
AT duanecbutton effectofaninvertedseatedpositionwithupperarmbloodflowrestrictiononmeasuresofelbowflexorsneuromuscularperformance
AT ursgranacher effectofaninvertedseatedpositionwithupperarmbloodflowrestrictiononmeasuresofelbowflexorsneuromuscularperformance
AT davidgbehm effectofaninvertedseatedpositionwithupperarmbloodflowrestrictiononmeasuresofelbowflexorsneuromuscularperformance
_version_ 1721421208535171072