Can We Avoid a Sick Fiscal Future? The Non-Sustainability of Health-Care Spending with an Aging Population

Funding for Canadian public health care has long relied on a “pay-as-you-go” funding model: for the most part, government pays for health costs each year from taxes collected in that fiscal year with effectively nothing put aside for projected rising health-care costs in the future. But the future o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J.C. Herbert Emery, David Still, Tom Cottrell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Calgary 2012-10-01
Series:The School of Public Policy Publications
Online Access:https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/emery-generational-balances-final.pdf
id doaj-7702c60fedbf45be9b71c0dd7d97cc81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7702c60fedbf45be9b71c0dd7d97cc812020-11-24T23:10:20ZengUniversity of CalgaryThe School of Public Policy Publications2560-83122560-83202012-10-01531123https://doi.org/10.11575/sppp.v5i0.42401Can We Avoid a Sick Fiscal Future? The Non-Sustainability of Health-Care Spending with an Aging PopulationJ.C. Herbert Emery0David Still1Tom Cottrell2University of CalgaryUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of CalgaryFunding for Canadian public health care has long relied on a “pay-as-you-go” funding model: for the most part, government pays for health costs each year from taxes collected in that fiscal year with effectively nothing put aside for projected rising health-care costs in the future. But the future of Canadian public health care is going to get more expensive as the relatively large cohort of baby boomers reaches retirement age. As they exit the work force, and enter the ages at which Canadians use the health-care system more, a smaller population of younger workers is going to be left paying the growing health-care costs of older Canadians. If Canadians intend to preserve a publicly funded medicare system that offers a similar level of service in the future as it does today, under the pay-as-you-go model, eventually peak taxes for Canadians born after 1988 will end up twice as high as the peak taxes that the oldest baby boomers paid. The “payas-you-go” model has become like a Ponzi scheme, where those who got in early enough make out nicely, while those who arrive late stand to suffer a serious financial blow. This should concern both Canadians who value a comprehensive public health system as well as Canadians who value competitive tax rates: There is no reason to be certain that future taxpayers will blithely accept having their taxes substantially increased to finance health care for another, older generation that did not pay for a significant portion of its own health care. If the burden proves too high for the taxpaying public to accept, that could well jeopardize Canada’s health-care system as we know it. If Canadians intend to preserve their iconic public health system, and are unprepared to unjustly overburden future generations with the tax bill left by their parents and grandparents, provincial governments must make strong and rapid efforts to reform the health system. They must find more cost-efficient ways of managing medicine, including new approaches to eldercare, chronic disease prevention and better health promotion. If policymakers respond in time with a workable strategy and adequate effort, the substantial financial health-care liability currently faced by future generations may not be eliminated entirely, but it can still be reduced dramatically. https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/emery-generational-balances-final.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J.C. Herbert Emery
David Still
Tom Cottrell
spellingShingle J.C. Herbert Emery
David Still
Tom Cottrell
Can We Avoid a Sick Fiscal Future? The Non-Sustainability of Health-Care Spending with an Aging Population
The School of Public Policy Publications
author_facet J.C. Herbert Emery
David Still
Tom Cottrell
author_sort J.C. Herbert Emery
title Can We Avoid a Sick Fiscal Future? The Non-Sustainability of Health-Care Spending with an Aging Population
title_short Can We Avoid a Sick Fiscal Future? The Non-Sustainability of Health-Care Spending with an Aging Population
title_full Can We Avoid a Sick Fiscal Future? The Non-Sustainability of Health-Care Spending with an Aging Population
title_fullStr Can We Avoid a Sick Fiscal Future? The Non-Sustainability of Health-Care Spending with an Aging Population
title_full_unstemmed Can We Avoid a Sick Fiscal Future? The Non-Sustainability of Health-Care Spending with an Aging Population
title_sort can we avoid a sick fiscal future? the non-sustainability of health-care spending with an aging population
publisher University of Calgary
series The School of Public Policy Publications
issn 2560-8312
2560-8320
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Funding for Canadian public health care has long relied on a “pay-as-you-go” funding model: for the most part, government pays for health costs each year from taxes collected in that fiscal year with effectively nothing put aside for projected rising health-care costs in the future. But the future of Canadian public health care is going to get more expensive as the relatively large cohort of baby boomers reaches retirement age. As they exit the work force, and enter the ages at which Canadians use the health-care system more, a smaller population of younger workers is going to be left paying the growing health-care costs of older Canadians. If Canadians intend to preserve a publicly funded medicare system that offers a similar level of service in the future as it does today, under the pay-as-you-go model, eventually peak taxes for Canadians born after 1988 will end up twice as high as the peak taxes that the oldest baby boomers paid. The “payas-you-go” model has become like a Ponzi scheme, where those who got in early enough make out nicely, while those who arrive late stand to suffer a serious financial blow. This should concern both Canadians who value a comprehensive public health system as well as Canadians who value competitive tax rates: There is no reason to be certain that future taxpayers will blithely accept having their taxes substantially increased to finance health care for another, older generation that did not pay for a significant portion of its own health care. If the burden proves too high for the taxpaying public to accept, that could well jeopardize Canada’s health-care system as we know it. If Canadians intend to preserve their iconic public health system, and are unprepared to unjustly overburden future generations with the tax bill left by their parents and grandparents, provincial governments must make strong and rapid efforts to reform the health system. They must find more cost-efficient ways of managing medicine, including new approaches to eldercare, chronic disease prevention and better health promotion. If policymakers respond in time with a workable strategy and adequate effort, the substantial financial health-care liability currently faced by future generations may not be eliminated entirely, but it can still be reduced dramatically.
url https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/emery-generational-balances-final.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jcherbertemery canweavoidasickfiscalfuturethenonsustainabilityofhealthcarespendingwithanagingpopulation
AT davidstill canweavoidasickfiscalfuturethenonsustainabilityofhealthcarespendingwithanagingpopulation
AT tomcottrell canweavoidasickfiscalfuturethenonsustainabilityofhealthcarespendingwithanagingpopulation
_version_ 1725607612505915392