Education Sciences: Towards a Theoretical Rebirth Beyond Reductionisms
In order to clarify the directions that Education Sciences may take in the near future we start by discussing the current epistemological predicament of Education, and then articulate this discussion with an assessment of the impact of some major determinant external factors. We proceed by presentin...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca
2013-11-01
|
Series: | Teoría de la Educación: Revista Interuniversitaria |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-3743/article/view/11149 |
id |
doaj-76ea3cb7c29241779c0bf913fff6c9cf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-76ea3cb7c29241779c0bf913fff6c9cf2020-11-25T02:33:18ZengEdiciones Universidad de SalamancaTeoría de la Educación: Revista Interuniversitaria1130-37432386-56602013-11-01251476210.14201/teri.1114910637Education Sciences: Towards a Theoretical Rebirth Beyond ReductionismsMaria FORMOSINHO0Carlos REIS1Paulo Renato Cardoso DE JESUS2Universidade de CoimbraInstituto Politécnico da GuardaUniversidade de LisboaIn order to clarify the directions that Education Sciences may take in the near future we start by discussing the current epistemological predicament of Education, and then articulate this discussion with an assessment of the impact of some major determinant external factors. We proceed by presenting the thread of Modernity in the configurations of educational reason and the impact of the inner fracture of reason fostered by Postmodernity, which leads us to conclude with the epistemic and normative requirements for theorizing Education. To avoid reductionism, we propose a triangular metatheory that should be able to account for the irreducible complexity of education. It presents a three-dimensional field where Education Sciences comprise, firstly, a hermeneutic and speculative dimension, cultivated by philosophy and oriented towards the setting of values and goals for the action, secondly, a descriptive and explanatory dimension, common to other Social Sciences, and thirdly an operational and technological dimension which surpasses the mere technical rationality confined to the selection of means and operationalization of goals, and therefore is in search of an intersubjective agreement that builds a consensus on the deontological normativity that regulates the activity of the professional educator, in its role of free agent and as a resource for action and change.https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-3743/article/view/11149ciencias de la educaciónmetateoríaepistemologíaposmodernidad |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Maria FORMOSINHO Carlos REIS Paulo Renato Cardoso DE JESUS |
spellingShingle |
Maria FORMOSINHO Carlos REIS Paulo Renato Cardoso DE JESUS Education Sciences: Towards a Theoretical Rebirth Beyond Reductionisms Teoría de la Educación: Revista Interuniversitaria ciencias de la educación metateoría epistemología posmodernidad |
author_facet |
Maria FORMOSINHO Carlos REIS Paulo Renato Cardoso DE JESUS |
author_sort |
Maria FORMOSINHO |
title |
Education Sciences: Towards a Theoretical Rebirth Beyond Reductionisms |
title_short |
Education Sciences: Towards a Theoretical Rebirth Beyond Reductionisms |
title_full |
Education Sciences: Towards a Theoretical Rebirth Beyond Reductionisms |
title_fullStr |
Education Sciences: Towards a Theoretical Rebirth Beyond Reductionisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Education Sciences: Towards a Theoretical Rebirth Beyond Reductionisms |
title_sort |
education sciences: towards a theoretical rebirth beyond reductionisms |
publisher |
Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca |
series |
Teoría de la Educación: Revista Interuniversitaria |
issn |
1130-3743 2386-5660 |
publishDate |
2013-11-01 |
description |
In order to clarify the directions that Education Sciences may take in the near future we start by discussing the current epistemological predicament of Education, and then articulate this discussion with an assessment of the impact of some major determinant external factors. We proceed by presenting the thread of Modernity in the configurations of educational reason and the impact of the inner fracture of reason fostered by Postmodernity, which leads us to conclude with the epistemic and normative requirements for theorizing Education. To avoid reductionism, we propose a triangular metatheory that should be able to account for the irreducible complexity of education. It presents a three-dimensional field where Education Sciences comprise, firstly, a hermeneutic and speculative dimension, cultivated by philosophy and oriented towards the setting of values and goals for the action, secondly, a descriptive and explanatory dimension, common to other Social Sciences, and thirdly an operational and technological dimension which surpasses the mere technical rationality confined to the selection of means and operationalization of goals, and therefore is in search of an intersubjective agreement that builds a consensus on the deontological normativity that regulates the activity of the professional educator, in its role of free agent and as a resource for action and change. |
topic |
ciencias de la educación metateoría epistemología posmodernidad |
url |
https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/1130-3743/article/view/11149 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariaformosinho educationsciencestowardsatheoreticalrebirthbeyondreductionisms AT carlosreis educationsciencestowardsatheoreticalrebirthbeyondreductionisms AT paulorenatocardosodejesus educationsciencestowardsatheoreticalrebirthbeyondreductionisms |
_version_ |
1724814959954624512 |