Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companies

This study presents a novel approach to selecting comparable companies in equity valuation. While valuation multiples is probably the most common valuation method in practice, discounted cash flow and residual income valuation models are advocated by academics. A key aspect in valuation by multiples...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frank Asche, Bård Misund
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Cogent Economics & Finance
Subjects:
p/e
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1264538
id doaj-76e9aa6cc31f4407a751c8d088e28d15
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76e9aa6cc31f4407a751c8d088e28d152021-02-18T13:53:22ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Economics & Finance2332-20392016-12-014110.1080/23322039.2016.12645381264538Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companiesFrank Asche0Bård Misund1University of FloridaUniversity of StavangerThis study presents a novel approach to selecting comparable companies in equity valuation. While valuation multiples is probably the most common valuation method in practice, discounted cash flow and residual income valuation models are advocated by academics. A key aspect in valuation by multiples is peer group selection. In this paper, we examine the usefulness of econometric techniques in peer-group selection for the largest companies in the international oil and gas sector. Using Chow tests, we are able to identify firms with similar relationships between valuation multiples and relevant value drivers. These results of our study suggest that analysts and investors should, when carrying out valuations, be careful in selecting the companies that comprise the peer groups. Comparable company selection could be carried out using econometric techniques that select companies on the basis of similarities in the relation between financial information and market valuation, instead of being based purely on analysts’ subjective judgments.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1264538oil and gas companiesoil majorsvaluationvaluation multiplespeer groupsp/eexxon
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frank Asche
Bård Misund
spellingShingle Frank Asche
Bård Misund
Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companies
Cogent Economics & Finance
oil and gas companies
oil majors
valuation
valuation multiples
peer groups
p/e
exxon
author_facet Frank Asche
Bård Misund
author_sort Frank Asche
title Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companies
title_short Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companies
title_full Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companies
title_fullStr Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companies
title_full_unstemmed Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companies
title_sort who’s a major? a novel approach to peer group selection: empirical evidence from oil and gas companies
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Economics & Finance
issn 2332-2039
publishDate 2016-12-01
description This study presents a novel approach to selecting comparable companies in equity valuation. While valuation multiples is probably the most common valuation method in practice, discounted cash flow and residual income valuation models are advocated by academics. A key aspect in valuation by multiples is peer group selection. In this paper, we examine the usefulness of econometric techniques in peer-group selection for the largest companies in the international oil and gas sector. Using Chow tests, we are able to identify firms with similar relationships between valuation multiples and relevant value drivers. These results of our study suggest that analysts and investors should, when carrying out valuations, be careful in selecting the companies that comprise the peer groups. Comparable company selection could be carried out using econometric techniques that select companies on the basis of similarities in the relation between financial information and market valuation, instead of being based purely on analysts’ subjective judgments.
topic oil and gas companies
oil majors
valuation
valuation multiples
peer groups
p/e
exxon
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1264538
work_keys_str_mv AT frankasche whosamajoranovelapproachtopeergroupselectionempiricalevidencefromoilandgascompanies
AT bardmisund whosamajoranovelapproachtopeergroupselectionempiricalevidencefromoilandgascompanies
_version_ 1724262873333497856