Event-related potential measures of the intending process: Time course and related ERP components

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The intending process plays an important part to the successful completion of many daily activities. However, few researchers have paid attention to this issue. This study was set to investigate the time course and the electrophysiol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhou Hui, Hu Yanbo, Dong Guangheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-02-01
Series:Behavioral and Brain Functions
Online Access:http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/15
id doaj-76e754975e624856bc60998b5131025d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76e754975e624856bc60998b5131025d2020-11-25T00:29:42ZengBMCBehavioral and Brain Functions1744-90812010-02-01611510.1186/1744-9081-6-15Event-related potential measures of the intending process: Time course and related ERP componentsZhou HuiHu YanboDong Guangheng<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The intending process plays an important part to the successful completion of many daily activities. However, few researchers have paid attention to this issue. This study was set to investigate the time course and the electrophysiological evidence of the intending process with a cue-respond task.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants were performing different cued conditions (deceptive, truthful, and watch-only). The time course of intending process was analyzed through the different effect of the cue stimuli.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The P2 component, that appeared between 200 and 400 ms after the cue was onset, can be observed in the intended conditions (deceptive, truthful), but cannot be found in un-intended condition (watch-only). The mean amplitude in P2 between the truthful and deceptive conditions was consistent with previous studies. P2 was thought to be the reflection of the intention process.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results suggested that the intention process happened 200 to 400 ms after the cue stimuli was onset, and the P2 in the posterior scalp during this period could be a specific component that related with the process of intention.</p> http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/15
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhou Hui
Hu Yanbo
Dong Guangheng
spellingShingle Zhou Hui
Hu Yanbo
Dong Guangheng
Event-related potential measures of the intending process: Time course and related ERP components
Behavioral and Brain Functions
author_facet Zhou Hui
Hu Yanbo
Dong Guangheng
author_sort Zhou Hui
title Event-related potential measures of the intending process: Time course and related ERP components
title_short Event-related potential measures of the intending process: Time course and related ERP components
title_full Event-related potential measures of the intending process: Time course and related ERP components
title_fullStr Event-related potential measures of the intending process: Time course and related ERP components
title_full_unstemmed Event-related potential measures of the intending process: Time course and related ERP components
title_sort event-related potential measures of the intending process: time course and related erp components
publisher BMC
series Behavioral and Brain Functions
issn 1744-9081
publishDate 2010-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The intending process plays an important part to the successful completion of many daily activities. However, few researchers have paid attention to this issue. This study was set to investigate the time course and the electrophysiological evidence of the intending process with a cue-respond task.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants were performing different cued conditions (deceptive, truthful, and watch-only). The time course of intending process was analyzed through the different effect of the cue stimuli.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The P2 component, that appeared between 200 and 400 ms after the cue was onset, can be observed in the intended conditions (deceptive, truthful), but cannot be found in un-intended condition (watch-only). The mean amplitude in P2 between the truthful and deceptive conditions was consistent with previous studies. P2 was thought to be the reflection of the intention process.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results suggested that the intention process happened 200 to 400 ms after the cue stimuli was onset, and the P2 in the posterior scalp during this period could be a specific component that related with the process of intention.</p>
url http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/6/1/15
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouhui eventrelatedpotentialmeasuresoftheintendingprocesstimecourseandrelatederpcomponents
AT huyanbo eventrelatedpotentialmeasuresoftheintendingprocesstimecourseandrelatederpcomponents
AT dongguangheng eventrelatedpotentialmeasuresoftheintendingprocesstimecourseandrelatederpcomponents
_version_ 1725330390891102208