The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission

Abstract Acoustic emission (AE) measurements of avalanches in different systems, such as domain movements in ferroics or the collapse of voids in porous materials, cannot be compared with model predictions without a detailed analysis of the AE process. In particular, most AE experiments scale the av...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blai Casals, Karin A. Dahmen, Boyuan Gou, Spencer Rooke, Ekhard K. H. Salje
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84688-7
id doaj-76e1eadfb31c4251bd61ecb54cec20d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76e1eadfb31c4251bd61ecb54cec20d72021-03-11T12:11:55ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-0111111010.1038/s41598-021-84688-7The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emissionBlai Casals0Karin A. Dahmen1Boyuan Gou2Spencer Rooke3Ekhard K. H. Salje4Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge UniversityDepartment of Physics, University of IllinoisState Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi’An Jiao Tong UniversityDepartment of Physics, University of IllinoisDepartment of Earth Sciences, Cambridge UniversityAbstract Acoustic emission (AE) measurements of avalanches in different systems, such as domain movements in ferroics or the collapse of voids in porous materials, cannot be compared with model predictions without a detailed analysis of the AE process. In particular, most AE experiments scale the avalanche energy E, maximum amplitude Amax and duration D as E ~ A max x and A max  ~ D χ with x = 2 and a poorly defined power law distribution for the duration. In contrast, simple mean field theory (MFT) predicts that x = 3 and χ = 2. The disagreement is due to details of the AE measurements: the initial acoustic strain signal of an avalanche is modified by the propagation of the acoustic wave, which is then measured by the detector. We demonstrate, by simple model simulations, that typical avalanches follow the observed AE results with x = 2 and ‘half-moon’ shapes for the cross-correlation. Furthermore, the size S of an avalanche does not always scale as the square of the maximum AE avalanche amplitude A max as predicted by MFT but scales linearly S ~ A max . We propose that the AE rise time reflects the atomistic avalanche time profile better than the duration of the AE signal.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84688-7
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Blai Casals
Karin A. Dahmen
Boyuan Gou
Spencer Rooke
Ekhard K. H. Salje
spellingShingle Blai Casals
Karin A. Dahmen
Boyuan Gou
Spencer Rooke
Ekhard K. H. Salje
The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission
Scientific Reports
author_facet Blai Casals
Karin A. Dahmen
Boyuan Gou
Spencer Rooke
Ekhard K. H. Salje
author_sort Blai Casals
title The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission
title_short The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission
title_full The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission
title_fullStr The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission
title_full_unstemmed The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission
title_sort duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Acoustic emission (AE) measurements of avalanches in different systems, such as domain movements in ferroics or the collapse of voids in porous materials, cannot be compared with model predictions without a detailed analysis of the AE process. In particular, most AE experiments scale the avalanche energy E, maximum amplitude Amax and duration D as E ~ A max x and A max  ~ D χ with x = 2 and a poorly defined power law distribution for the duration. In contrast, simple mean field theory (MFT) predicts that x = 3 and χ = 2. The disagreement is due to details of the AE measurements: the initial acoustic strain signal of an avalanche is modified by the propagation of the acoustic wave, which is then measured by the detector. We demonstrate, by simple model simulations, that typical avalanches follow the observed AE results with x = 2 and ‘half-moon’ shapes for the cross-correlation. Furthermore, the size S of an avalanche does not always scale as the square of the maximum AE avalanche amplitude A max as predicted by MFT but scales linearly S ~ A max . We propose that the AE rise time reflects the atomistic avalanche time profile better than the duration of the AE signal.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84688-7
work_keys_str_mv AT blaicasals thedurationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission
AT karinadahmen thedurationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission
AT boyuangou thedurationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission
AT spencerrooke thedurationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission
AT ekhardkhsalje thedurationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission
AT blaicasals durationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission
AT karinadahmen durationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission
AT boyuangou durationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission
AT spencerrooke durationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission
AT ekhardkhsalje durationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission
_version_ 1724224695978426368