The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission
Abstract Acoustic emission (AE) measurements of avalanches in different systems, such as domain movements in ferroics or the collapse of voids in porous materials, cannot be compared with model predictions without a detailed analysis of the AE process. In particular, most AE experiments scale the av...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84688-7 |
id |
doaj-76e1eadfb31c4251bd61ecb54cec20d7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-76e1eadfb31c4251bd61ecb54cec20d72021-03-11T12:11:55ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-0111111010.1038/s41598-021-84688-7The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emissionBlai Casals0Karin A. Dahmen1Boyuan Gou2Spencer Rooke3Ekhard K. H. Salje4Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge UniversityDepartment of Physics, University of IllinoisState Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Xi’An Jiao Tong UniversityDepartment of Physics, University of IllinoisDepartment of Earth Sciences, Cambridge UniversityAbstract Acoustic emission (AE) measurements of avalanches in different systems, such as domain movements in ferroics or the collapse of voids in porous materials, cannot be compared with model predictions without a detailed analysis of the AE process. In particular, most AE experiments scale the avalanche energy E, maximum amplitude Amax and duration D as E ~ A max x and A max ~ D χ with x = 2 and a poorly defined power law distribution for the duration. In contrast, simple mean field theory (MFT) predicts that x = 3 and χ = 2. The disagreement is due to details of the AE measurements: the initial acoustic strain signal of an avalanche is modified by the propagation of the acoustic wave, which is then measured by the detector. We demonstrate, by simple model simulations, that typical avalanches follow the observed AE results with x = 2 and ‘half-moon’ shapes for the cross-correlation. Furthermore, the size S of an avalanche does not always scale as the square of the maximum AE avalanche amplitude A max as predicted by MFT but scales linearly S ~ A max . We propose that the AE rise time reflects the atomistic avalanche time profile better than the duration of the AE signal.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84688-7 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Blai Casals Karin A. Dahmen Boyuan Gou Spencer Rooke Ekhard K. H. Salje |
spellingShingle |
Blai Casals Karin A. Dahmen Boyuan Gou Spencer Rooke Ekhard K. H. Salje The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Blai Casals Karin A. Dahmen Boyuan Gou Spencer Rooke Ekhard K. H. Salje |
author_sort |
Blai Casals |
title |
The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission |
title_short |
The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission |
title_full |
The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission |
title_fullStr |
The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission |
title_full_unstemmed |
The duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission |
title_sort |
duration-energy-size enigma for acoustic emission |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Acoustic emission (AE) measurements of avalanches in different systems, such as domain movements in ferroics or the collapse of voids in porous materials, cannot be compared with model predictions without a detailed analysis of the AE process. In particular, most AE experiments scale the avalanche energy E, maximum amplitude Amax and duration D as E ~ A max x and A max ~ D χ with x = 2 and a poorly defined power law distribution for the duration. In contrast, simple mean field theory (MFT) predicts that x = 3 and χ = 2. The disagreement is due to details of the AE measurements: the initial acoustic strain signal of an avalanche is modified by the propagation of the acoustic wave, which is then measured by the detector. We demonstrate, by simple model simulations, that typical avalanches follow the observed AE results with x = 2 and ‘half-moon’ shapes for the cross-correlation. Furthermore, the size S of an avalanche does not always scale as the square of the maximum AE avalanche amplitude A max as predicted by MFT but scales linearly S ~ A max . We propose that the AE rise time reflects the atomistic avalanche time profile better than the duration of the AE signal. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84688-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT blaicasals thedurationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission AT karinadahmen thedurationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission AT boyuangou thedurationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission AT spencerrooke thedurationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission AT ekhardkhsalje thedurationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission AT blaicasals durationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission AT karinadahmen durationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission AT boyuangou durationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission AT spencerrooke durationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission AT ekhardkhsalje durationenergysizeenigmaforacousticemission |
_version_ |
1724224695978426368 |