Medication changes after switching from CONCERTA® brand methylphenidate HCl to a generic long-acting formulation: A retrospective database study.

Observational studies of switching from branded to generic formulations of the same drug substance often lack appropriate comparators for the subjects who switched. Three generic formulations were deemed equivalent to Concerta: an authorized generic (AG) identical except for external packaging, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Fife, M Soledad Cepeda, Alan Baseman, Henry Richards, Peter Hu, H Lynn Starr, Anthony G Sena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5831385?pdf=render
id doaj-76e15ce9d6ed4398b32413a2bdc006cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76e15ce9d6ed4398b32413a2bdc006cc2020-11-24T20:48:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01132e019345310.1371/journal.pone.0193453Medication changes after switching from CONCERTA® brand methylphenidate HCl to a generic long-acting formulation: A retrospective database study.Daniel FifeM Soledad CepedaAlan BasemanHenry RichardsPeter HuH Lynn StarrAnthony G SenaObservational studies of switching from branded to generic formulations of the same drug substance often lack appropriate comparators for the subjects who switched. Three generic formulations were deemed equivalent to Concerta: an authorized generic (AG) identical except for external packaging, and two other generics (EG).Compare the incidence of a combined endpoint (switching back to Concerta, changing the use of immediate release methylphenidate (MPH), stopping all long-acting methylphenidate, or starting a new medication) among people switched from Concerta to the AG versus the EG.Cohort study from the Truven CCAE database of people aged 6 to 65 diagnosed with ADHD, treated with Concerta, and switched to the EG or to the AG formulation.In the EG arm 24.6% and in the AG arm 19.7% of subjects switched back to Concerta. The proportion of subjects meeting the combined endpoint was 39.5% in the EG arm, 32.9% in the AG arm, a crude risk ratio of 1.20 (95% CI 0.94, 1.54). After adjustment by propensity score stratification, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.23 (95% CI 0.90, 1.70). In an unplanned analysis using a different method of adjustment, the adjusted OR was 1.00 (95% CI 0.69, 1.44).This study did not detect a difference between the proportion of people who met the study endpoint in the two study arms, i.e. between those who switched to a generic formulation that was identical to Concerta except for external packaging and those who switched to the comparison generics. The high incidence of the combined endpoint in the AG arm demonstrates the need for an appropriate comparator in studies of this type.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02730572.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5831385?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Fife
M Soledad Cepeda
Alan Baseman
Henry Richards
Peter Hu
H Lynn Starr
Anthony G Sena
spellingShingle Daniel Fife
M Soledad Cepeda
Alan Baseman
Henry Richards
Peter Hu
H Lynn Starr
Anthony G Sena
Medication changes after switching from CONCERTA® brand methylphenidate HCl to a generic long-acting formulation: A retrospective database study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Daniel Fife
M Soledad Cepeda
Alan Baseman
Henry Richards
Peter Hu
H Lynn Starr
Anthony G Sena
author_sort Daniel Fife
title Medication changes after switching from CONCERTA® brand methylphenidate HCl to a generic long-acting formulation: A retrospective database study.
title_short Medication changes after switching from CONCERTA® brand methylphenidate HCl to a generic long-acting formulation: A retrospective database study.
title_full Medication changes after switching from CONCERTA® brand methylphenidate HCl to a generic long-acting formulation: A retrospective database study.
title_fullStr Medication changes after switching from CONCERTA® brand methylphenidate HCl to a generic long-acting formulation: A retrospective database study.
title_full_unstemmed Medication changes after switching from CONCERTA® brand methylphenidate HCl to a generic long-acting formulation: A retrospective database study.
title_sort medication changes after switching from concerta® brand methylphenidate hcl to a generic long-acting formulation: a retrospective database study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Observational studies of switching from branded to generic formulations of the same drug substance often lack appropriate comparators for the subjects who switched. Three generic formulations were deemed equivalent to Concerta: an authorized generic (AG) identical except for external packaging, and two other generics (EG).Compare the incidence of a combined endpoint (switching back to Concerta, changing the use of immediate release methylphenidate (MPH), stopping all long-acting methylphenidate, or starting a new medication) among people switched from Concerta to the AG versus the EG.Cohort study from the Truven CCAE database of people aged 6 to 65 diagnosed with ADHD, treated with Concerta, and switched to the EG or to the AG formulation.In the EG arm 24.6% and in the AG arm 19.7% of subjects switched back to Concerta. The proportion of subjects meeting the combined endpoint was 39.5% in the EG arm, 32.9% in the AG arm, a crude risk ratio of 1.20 (95% CI 0.94, 1.54). After adjustment by propensity score stratification, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 1.23 (95% CI 0.90, 1.70). In an unplanned analysis using a different method of adjustment, the adjusted OR was 1.00 (95% CI 0.69, 1.44).This study did not detect a difference between the proportion of people who met the study endpoint in the two study arms, i.e. between those who switched to a generic formulation that was identical to Concerta except for external packaging and those who switched to the comparison generics. The high incidence of the combined endpoint in the AG arm demonstrates the need for an appropriate comparator in studies of this type.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02730572.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5831385?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT danielfife medicationchangesafterswitchingfromconcertabrandmethylphenidatehcltoagenericlongactingformulationaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT msoledadcepeda medicationchangesafterswitchingfromconcertabrandmethylphenidatehcltoagenericlongactingformulationaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT alanbaseman medicationchangesafterswitchingfromconcertabrandmethylphenidatehcltoagenericlongactingformulationaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT henryrichards medicationchangesafterswitchingfromconcertabrandmethylphenidatehcltoagenericlongactingformulationaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT peterhu medicationchangesafterswitchingfromconcertabrandmethylphenidatehcltoagenericlongactingformulationaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT hlynnstarr medicationchangesafterswitchingfromconcertabrandmethylphenidatehcltoagenericlongactingformulationaretrospectivedatabasestudy
AT anthonygsena medicationchangesafterswitchingfromconcertabrandmethylphenidatehcltoagenericlongactingformulationaretrospectivedatabasestudy
_version_ 1716808718819000320