Economic evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy with the optimizer IVs in the management of heart failure patients

Aims: Heart failure represents a major burden for health systems and societies. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy was developed in recent years for patients with normal QRS in whom optimal pharmacological (OMT) treatment has failed to control symptoms adequately. This study presents an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikos Maniadakis, Vasilios Fragoulakis, Charalambos Mylonas, Rakesh Sharma, Andrew J Stewart Coats
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Barcaray International 2015-01-01
Series:International Cardiovascular Forum Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://icfjournal.org/index.php/icfj/article/view/173/pdf-2
id doaj-76d4ed8f556645479288f34e7777cfb2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76d4ed8f556645479288f34e7777cfb22020-11-24T23:42:39ZengBarcaray InternationalInternational Cardiovascular Forum Journal2410-26362409-34242015-01-0144352https://doi.org/10.17987/icfj.v4i0.173Economic evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy with the optimizer IVs in the management of heart failure patientsNikos Maniadakis0Vasilios Fragoulakis1Charalambos Mylonas2Rakesh Sharma3Andrew J Stewart Coats4Professor, Department of Health Services Organisation & Management and Associate Dean, National School of Public Health, Athens, GRResearch Fellow, Department of Health Services Organisation & Management, National School of Public Health, Athens, GRResearch Fellow, Department of Health Services Organisation & Management, National School of Public Health, Athens, GRConsultant Cardiologist, The Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UKProfessor, Monash University, Australia and University of Warwick, UKAims: Heart failure represents a major burden for health systems and societies. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy was developed in recent years for patients with normal QRS in whom optimal pharmacological (OMT) treatment has failed to control symptoms adequately. This study presents an economic evaluation of CCM therapy for the UK. Methods A Markov model was built to simulate the management of patients under two therapy scenarios, on OMT alone and CCM+OMT respectively. The horizon is the patient’s life time and the cycle is 4 weeks. The model estimates life year (LYs), quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and overall treatment costs. Data to populate it came from relevant CCM trials, the literature and other sources. Results The total mean life-time cost was £37,467 in the CCM+OMT arm and £16,885 in the OMT arm. Patients in the OMT arm gained 7.00 LYs and 4.00 QALYs and those on CCM+OMT 7.96 and 5.26 respectively. The incremental cost per QALY was £16,405 and the incremental cost per LY £21,415. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the results are pretty stable and stochastic analysis indicates that at a £30,000 per QALY threshold the likelihood of CCM+OMT being cost-effective is 99.8% and at £25,000 per QALY 97%. Conclusion The present analysis indicates that CCM may be cost-effective therapy. This early conclusion should be viewed in the light of the caveats of the modeling methods used, due to data availability limitations. Long-term studies directly collecting hospitalization and mortality data should be undertaken to provide more robust evidence.http://icfjournal.org/index.php/icfj/article/view/173/pdf-2Heart FailureCardiac Contractility ModulationOptimizerEconomic EvaluationCost Effectiveness AnalysisCost Utility Analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikos Maniadakis
Vasilios Fragoulakis
Charalambos Mylonas
Rakesh Sharma
Andrew J Stewart Coats
spellingShingle Nikos Maniadakis
Vasilios Fragoulakis
Charalambos Mylonas
Rakesh Sharma
Andrew J Stewart Coats
Economic evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy with the optimizer IVs in the management of heart failure patients
International Cardiovascular Forum Journal
Heart Failure
Cardiac Contractility Modulation
Optimizer
Economic Evaluation
Cost Effectiveness Analysis
Cost Utility Analysis
author_facet Nikos Maniadakis
Vasilios Fragoulakis
Charalambos Mylonas
Rakesh Sharma
Andrew J Stewart Coats
author_sort Nikos Maniadakis
title Economic evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy with the optimizer IVs in the management of heart failure patients
title_short Economic evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy with the optimizer IVs in the management of heart failure patients
title_full Economic evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy with the optimizer IVs in the management of heart failure patients
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy with the optimizer IVs in the management of heart failure patients
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy with the optimizer IVs in the management of heart failure patients
title_sort economic evaluation of cardiac contractility modulation (ccm) therapy with the optimizer ivs in the management of heart failure patients
publisher Barcaray International
series International Cardiovascular Forum Journal
issn 2410-2636
2409-3424
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Aims: Heart failure represents a major burden for health systems and societies. Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy was developed in recent years for patients with normal QRS in whom optimal pharmacological (OMT) treatment has failed to control symptoms adequately. This study presents an economic evaluation of CCM therapy for the UK. Methods A Markov model was built to simulate the management of patients under two therapy scenarios, on OMT alone and CCM+OMT respectively. The horizon is the patient’s life time and the cycle is 4 weeks. The model estimates life year (LYs), quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and overall treatment costs. Data to populate it came from relevant CCM trials, the literature and other sources. Results The total mean life-time cost was £37,467 in the CCM+OMT arm and £16,885 in the OMT arm. Patients in the OMT arm gained 7.00 LYs and 4.00 QALYs and those on CCM+OMT 7.96 and 5.26 respectively. The incremental cost per QALY was £16,405 and the incremental cost per LY £21,415. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the results are pretty stable and stochastic analysis indicates that at a £30,000 per QALY threshold the likelihood of CCM+OMT being cost-effective is 99.8% and at £25,000 per QALY 97%. Conclusion The present analysis indicates that CCM may be cost-effective therapy. This early conclusion should be viewed in the light of the caveats of the modeling methods used, due to data availability limitations. Long-term studies directly collecting hospitalization and mortality data should be undertaken to provide more robust evidence.
topic Heart Failure
Cardiac Contractility Modulation
Optimizer
Economic Evaluation
Cost Effectiveness Analysis
Cost Utility Analysis
url http://icfjournal.org/index.php/icfj/article/view/173/pdf-2
work_keys_str_mv AT nikosmaniadakis economicevaluationofcardiaccontractilitymodulationccmtherapywiththeoptimizerivsinthemanagementofheartfailurepatients
AT vasiliosfragoulakis economicevaluationofcardiaccontractilitymodulationccmtherapywiththeoptimizerivsinthemanagementofheartfailurepatients
AT charalambosmylonas economicevaluationofcardiaccontractilitymodulationccmtherapywiththeoptimizerivsinthemanagementofheartfailurepatients
AT rakeshsharma economicevaluationofcardiaccontractilitymodulationccmtherapywiththeoptimizerivsinthemanagementofheartfailurepatients
AT andrewjstewartcoats economicevaluationofcardiaccontractilitymodulationccmtherapywiththeoptimizerivsinthemanagementofheartfailurepatients
_version_ 1725503761944674304