3D kidney segmentation from abdominal diffusion MRI using an appearance-guided deformable boundary.

• Main Authors: Mohamed Shehata, Ali Mahmoud, Ahmed Soliman, Fahmi Khalifa, Mohammed Ghazal, Mohamed Abou El-Ghar, Moumen El-Melegy, Ayman El-Baz
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
• Series: PLoS ONE
• Online Access: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6044527?pdf=render

A new technique for more accurate automatic segmentation of the kidney from its surrounding abdominal structures in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is presented. This approach combines a new 3D probabilistic shape model of the kidney with a first-order appearance model and fourth-order spatial model of the diffusion-weighted signal intensity to guide the evolution of a 3D geometric deformable model. The probabilistic shape model was built from labeled training datasets to produce a spatially variant, independent random field of region labels. A Markov-Gibbs random field spatial model with up to fourth-order interactions was adequate to capture the inhomogeneity of renal tissues in the DW-MRI signal. A new analytical approach estimated the Gibbs potentials directly from the DW-MRI data to be segmented, in order that the segmentation procedure would be fully automatic. Finally, to better distinguish the kidney object from the surrounding tissues, marginal gray level distributions inside and outside of the deformable boundary were modeled with adaptive linear combinations of discrete Gaussians (first-order appearance model). The approach was tested on a cohort of 64 DW-MRI datasets with b-values ranging from 50 to 1000 s/mm2. The performance of the presented approach was evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross validation and compared against three other well-known segmentation methods applied to the same DW-MRI data using the following evaluation metrics: 1) the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC); 2) the 95-percentile modified Hausdorff distance (MHD); and 3) the percentage kidney volume difference (PKVD). High performance of the new approach was confirmed by the high DSC (0.95±0.01), low MHD (3.9±0.76) mm, and low PKVD (9.5±2.2)% relative to manual segmentation by an MR expert (a board certified radiologist).