A framework for protein and membrane interactions
We introduce the BioBeta Framework, a meta-model for both protein-level and membrane-level interactions of living cells. This formalism aims to provide a formal setting where to encode, compare and merge models at different abstraction levels; in particular, higher-level (e.g. membrane) activities c...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Publishing Association
2009-11-01
|
Series: | Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science |
Online Access: | http://arxiv.org/pdf/0911.4513v1 |
id |
doaj-76be8e530d5745209b80435326dd4c69 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-76be8e530d5745209b80435326dd4c692020-11-24T22:44:05ZengOpen Publishing AssociationElectronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science2075-21802009-11-0111Proc. MeCBIC 2009193310.4204/EPTCS.11.2A framework for protein and membrane interactionsGiorgio BacciDavide GrohmannMarino MiculanWe introduce the BioBeta Framework, a meta-model for both protein-level and membrane-level interactions of living cells. This formalism aims to provide a formal setting where to encode, compare and merge models at different abstraction levels; in particular, higher-level (e.g. membrane) activities can be given a formal biological justification in terms of low-level (i.e., protein) interactions. A BioBeta specification provides a protein signature together a set of protein reactions, in the spirit of the kappa-calculus. Moreover, the specification describes when a protein configuration triggers one of the only two membrane interaction allowed, that is "pinch" and "fuse". In this paper we define the syntax and semantics of BioBeta, analyse its properties, give it an interpretation as biobigraphical reactive systems, and discuss its expressivity by comparing with kappa-calculus and modelling significant examples. Notably, BioBeta has been designed after a bigraphical metamodel for the same purposes. Hence, each instance of the calculus corresponds to a bigraphical reactive system, and vice versa (almost). Therefore, we can inherith the rich theory of bigraphs, such as the automatic construction of labelled transition systems and behavioural congruences. http://arxiv.org/pdf/0911.4513v1 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Giorgio Bacci Davide Grohmann Marino Miculan |
spellingShingle |
Giorgio Bacci Davide Grohmann Marino Miculan A framework for protein and membrane interactions Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science |
author_facet |
Giorgio Bacci Davide Grohmann Marino Miculan |
author_sort |
Giorgio Bacci |
title |
A framework for protein and membrane interactions |
title_short |
A framework for protein and membrane interactions |
title_full |
A framework for protein and membrane interactions |
title_fullStr |
A framework for protein and membrane interactions |
title_full_unstemmed |
A framework for protein and membrane interactions |
title_sort |
framework for protein and membrane interactions |
publisher |
Open Publishing Association |
series |
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science |
issn |
2075-2180 |
publishDate |
2009-11-01 |
description |
We introduce the BioBeta Framework, a meta-model for both protein-level and membrane-level interactions of living cells. This formalism aims to provide a formal setting where to encode, compare and merge models at different abstraction levels; in particular, higher-level (e.g. membrane) activities can be given a formal biological justification in terms of low-level (i.e., protein) interactions. A BioBeta specification provides a protein signature together a set of protein reactions, in the spirit of the kappa-calculus. Moreover, the specification describes when a protein configuration triggers one of the only two membrane interaction allowed, that is "pinch" and "fuse". In this paper we define the syntax and semantics of BioBeta, analyse its properties, give it an interpretation as biobigraphical reactive systems, and discuss its expressivity by comparing with kappa-calculus and modelling significant examples. Notably, BioBeta has been designed after a bigraphical metamodel for the same purposes. Hence, each instance of the calculus corresponds to a bigraphical reactive system, and vice versa (almost). Therefore, we can inherith the rich theory of bigraphs, such as the automatic construction of labelled transition systems and behavioural congruences. |
url |
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0911.4513v1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giorgiobacci aframeworkforproteinandmembraneinteractions AT davidegrohmann aframeworkforproteinandmembraneinteractions AT marinomiculan aframeworkforproteinandmembraneinteractions AT giorgiobacci frameworkforproteinandmembraneinteractions AT davidegrohmann frameworkforproteinandmembraneinteractions AT marinomiculan frameworkforproteinandmembraneinteractions |
_version_ |
1725693001190080512 |