Comparison of hyaluronic acid-based micelles and polyethylene glycol-based micelles on reversal of multidrug resistance and enhanced anticancer efficacy in vitro and in vivo

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based block copolymer micelles and hyaluronic acid (HA)-based grafted copolymer micelles have been widely investigated in chemotherapy. In this study, to evaluate the differences among HA-based grafted polymer micelles, PEG-based block polymer micelles and the mixed of thes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jinling Wang, Ying Li, Lifang Wang, Xiaohui Wang, Pengfei Tu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Drug Delivery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2018.1428385
id doaj-76a9438fffb742929eda2c5abe4aebdd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76a9438fffb742929eda2c5abe4aebdd2020-11-25T02:59:45ZengTaylor & Francis GroupDrug Delivery1071-75441521-04642018-01-0125133034010.1080/10717544.2018.14283851428385Comparison of hyaluronic acid-based micelles and polyethylene glycol-based micelles on reversal of multidrug resistance and enhanced anticancer efficacy in vitro and in vivoJinling Wang0Ying Li1Lifang Wang2Xiaohui Wang3Pengfei Tu4Modern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese MedicineModern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese MedicineModern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese MedicineModern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese MedicineModern Research Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese MedicinePolyethylene glycol (PEG)-based block copolymer micelles and hyaluronic acid (HA)-based grafted copolymer micelles have been widely investigated in chemotherapy. In this study, to evaluate the differences among HA-based grafted polymer micelles, PEG-based block polymer micelles and the mixed of these two micelles in enhancing antitumor effects and overcoming MDR, two amphiphilic vitamin E succinate (VES) derivatives, HA VES (HA-g-VES) and PEG 2000 VES (TPGS2k), were applied as nanocarriers to prepare HA-VES micelles (HA-PMs), TPGS2k micelles (TPGS2k-PMs) and the mixed micelles (HA/TPGS2k-PMs) for the co-delivery of doxorubicin (DOX) and curcumin (Cur). With the addition of TPGS2k, the particle size of HA/TPGS2k-PMs (153.37 ± 1.00 nm) was smaller than that of HA-PMs (223.83 ± 1.84) but significantly larger than that of TPGS2k-PMs (about 20 nm). The loading efficiency of HA/TPGS2k-PMs was 7.10%, which was lower than HA-PMs (8.31 ± 0.15%) but higher than TPGS2k-PMs (4.38 ± 0.24%). In vitro, HA/TPGS2k-PMs and TPGS2k-PMs exhibited higher cytotoxicity and reversal MDR effects than HA-PMs in MCF-7/Adr cells. However, HA/TPGS2k-PMs, HA-PMs and TPGS2k-PMs all significantly improved the tumor biodistribution, the antitumor effects and reduced the side effects of DOX in 4T1-tumor-bearing mice, but these three micelles displayed no differences in vivo. Therefore, EPR passive targeting effects caused by PEGylated micelles and CD44 active targeting effects caused by HA-based micelles have no significant variance in the delivery of antitumor drugs by i.v.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2018.1428385hyaluronic acidpolyethylene glycolmicellesmultidrug resistanceanticancer effectco-delivery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jinling Wang
Ying Li
Lifang Wang
Xiaohui Wang
Pengfei Tu
spellingShingle Jinling Wang
Ying Li
Lifang Wang
Xiaohui Wang
Pengfei Tu
Comparison of hyaluronic acid-based micelles and polyethylene glycol-based micelles on reversal of multidrug resistance and enhanced anticancer efficacy in vitro and in vivo
Drug Delivery
hyaluronic acid
polyethylene glycol
micelles
multidrug resistance
anticancer effect
co-delivery
author_facet Jinling Wang
Ying Li
Lifang Wang
Xiaohui Wang
Pengfei Tu
author_sort Jinling Wang
title Comparison of hyaluronic acid-based micelles and polyethylene glycol-based micelles on reversal of multidrug resistance and enhanced anticancer efficacy in vitro and in vivo
title_short Comparison of hyaluronic acid-based micelles and polyethylene glycol-based micelles on reversal of multidrug resistance and enhanced anticancer efficacy in vitro and in vivo
title_full Comparison of hyaluronic acid-based micelles and polyethylene glycol-based micelles on reversal of multidrug resistance and enhanced anticancer efficacy in vitro and in vivo
title_fullStr Comparison of hyaluronic acid-based micelles and polyethylene glycol-based micelles on reversal of multidrug resistance and enhanced anticancer efficacy in vitro and in vivo
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hyaluronic acid-based micelles and polyethylene glycol-based micelles on reversal of multidrug resistance and enhanced anticancer efficacy in vitro and in vivo
title_sort comparison of hyaluronic acid-based micelles and polyethylene glycol-based micelles on reversal of multidrug resistance and enhanced anticancer efficacy in vitro and in vivo
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Drug Delivery
issn 1071-7544
1521-0464
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based block copolymer micelles and hyaluronic acid (HA)-based grafted copolymer micelles have been widely investigated in chemotherapy. In this study, to evaluate the differences among HA-based grafted polymer micelles, PEG-based block polymer micelles and the mixed of these two micelles in enhancing antitumor effects and overcoming MDR, two amphiphilic vitamin E succinate (VES) derivatives, HA VES (HA-g-VES) and PEG 2000 VES (TPGS2k), were applied as nanocarriers to prepare HA-VES micelles (HA-PMs), TPGS2k micelles (TPGS2k-PMs) and the mixed micelles (HA/TPGS2k-PMs) for the co-delivery of doxorubicin (DOX) and curcumin (Cur). With the addition of TPGS2k, the particle size of HA/TPGS2k-PMs (153.37 ± 1.00 nm) was smaller than that of HA-PMs (223.83 ± 1.84) but significantly larger than that of TPGS2k-PMs (about 20 nm). The loading efficiency of HA/TPGS2k-PMs was 7.10%, which was lower than HA-PMs (8.31 ± 0.15%) but higher than TPGS2k-PMs (4.38 ± 0.24%). In vitro, HA/TPGS2k-PMs and TPGS2k-PMs exhibited higher cytotoxicity and reversal MDR effects than HA-PMs in MCF-7/Adr cells. However, HA/TPGS2k-PMs, HA-PMs and TPGS2k-PMs all significantly improved the tumor biodistribution, the antitumor effects and reduced the side effects of DOX in 4T1-tumor-bearing mice, but these three micelles displayed no differences in vivo. Therefore, EPR passive targeting effects caused by PEGylated micelles and CD44 active targeting effects caused by HA-based micelles have no significant variance in the delivery of antitumor drugs by i.v.
topic hyaluronic acid
polyethylene glycol
micelles
multidrug resistance
anticancer effect
co-delivery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2018.1428385
work_keys_str_mv AT jinlingwang comparisonofhyaluronicacidbasedmicellesandpolyethyleneglycolbasedmicellesonreversalofmultidrugresistanceandenhancedanticancerefficacyinvitroandinvivo
AT yingli comparisonofhyaluronicacidbasedmicellesandpolyethyleneglycolbasedmicellesonreversalofmultidrugresistanceandenhancedanticancerefficacyinvitroandinvivo
AT lifangwang comparisonofhyaluronicacidbasedmicellesandpolyethyleneglycolbasedmicellesonreversalofmultidrugresistanceandenhancedanticancerefficacyinvitroandinvivo
AT xiaohuiwang comparisonofhyaluronicacidbasedmicellesandpolyethyleneglycolbasedmicellesonreversalofmultidrugresistanceandenhancedanticancerefficacyinvitroandinvivo
AT pengfeitu comparisonofhyaluronicacidbasedmicellesandpolyethyleneglycolbasedmicellesonreversalofmultidrugresistanceandenhancedanticancerefficacyinvitroandinvivo
_version_ 1724701226161930240