Subjective Definitions of Problems and Symptoms in Palliative Care

Background Data from the core data set of the Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation (HOPE) from 1999 to 2001 demonstrated considerable variance in the incidence of patients’ symptoms and problems between participating services. This paper aims to investigate these differences more closely. Methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-01-01
Series:Palliative Care
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/PCRT.S6081
id doaj-76a4c18de53745cb947be87b2e59ad28
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76a4c18de53745cb947be87b2e59ad282020-11-25T03:43:55ZengSAGE PublishingPalliative Care1178-22422011-01-01510.4137/PCRT.S6081Subjective Definitions of Problems and Symptoms in Palliative Care Background Data from the core data set of the Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation (HOPE) from 1999 to 2001 demonstrated considerable variance in the incidence of patients’ symptoms and problems between participating services. This paper aims to investigate these differences more closely. Methods During the evaluation period of HOPE in 2002 a telephone survey with a representative of each participating unit was performed. Telephone interviews assessed the professionals’ definitions of selected symptoms and estimates of problem and symptom incidences. Content analysis was used to evaluate qualitative answers. Results Staff members rated pain, weakness, nausea/emesis as the most frequent physical symptoms; anxiety, depression and amentia as most frequent psychological symptoms; wound treatment, mobilisation and weakness as nursing problems and organisation of care settings, loneliness, demands of relatives the most common social needs. Staff members used a wide range of definitions for cachexia, weakness and depression. Discussion Standard definitions of symptoms and problems were lacking in the articulation of subjective staff members’ perspectives. Meaningful evaluation of multicentre surveys would require training in symptom assessment and classification in order to produce a common basis for documentation. Even though definitions differed widely, underlying concepts seemed to be compatible.https://doi.org/10.4137/PCRT.S6081
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
title Subjective Definitions of Problems and Symptoms in Palliative Care
spellingShingle Subjective Definitions of Problems and Symptoms in Palliative Care
Palliative Care
title_short Subjective Definitions of Problems and Symptoms in Palliative Care
title_full Subjective Definitions of Problems and Symptoms in Palliative Care
title_fullStr Subjective Definitions of Problems and Symptoms in Palliative Care
title_full_unstemmed Subjective Definitions of Problems and Symptoms in Palliative Care
title_sort subjective definitions of problems and symptoms in palliative care
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Palliative Care
issn 1178-2242
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Background Data from the core data set of the Hospice and Palliative Care Evaluation (HOPE) from 1999 to 2001 demonstrated considerable variance in the incidence of patients’ symptoms and problems between participating services. This paper aims to investigate these differences more closely. Methods During the evaluation period of HOPE in 2002 a telephone survey with a representative of each participating unit was performed. Telephone interviews assessed the professionals’ definitions of selected symptoms and estimates of problem and symptom incidences. Content analysis was used to evaluate qualitative answers. Results Staff members rated pain, weakness, nausea/emesis as the most frequent physical symptoms; anxiety, depression and amentia as most frequent psychological symptoms; wound treatment, mobilisation and weakness as nursing problems and organisation of care settings, loneliness, demands of relatives the most common social needs. Staff members used a wide range of definitions for cachexia, weakness and depression. Discussion Standard definitions of symptoms and problems were lacking in the articulation of subjective staff members’ perspectives. Meaningful evaluation of multicentre surveys would require training in symptom assessment and classification in order to produce a common basis for documentation. Even though definitions differed widely, underlying concepts seemed to be compatible.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/PCRT.S6081
work_keys_str_mv AT subjectivedefinitionsofproblemsandsymptomsinpalliativecare
_version_ 1724517417081634816