The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?

This study asks the question on which national "shoulders" the world's top-level research stands. Traditionally, the number of citations to national papers has been the evaluative measures of national scientific standings. We raise a different question: instead of analyzing the citati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lutz Bornmann, Caroline Wagner, Loet Leydesdorff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5868817?pdf=render
id doaj-76a04fc74b1c458b9deee548c870e305
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76a04fc74b1c458b9deee548c870e3052020-11-25T01:47:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01133e019480510.1371/journal.pone.0194805The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?Lutz BornmannCaroline WagnerLoet LeydesdorffThis study asks the question on which national "shoulders" the world's top-level research stands. Traditionally, the number of citations to national papers has been the evaluative measures of national scientific standings. We raise a different question: instead of analyzing the citations to a countries' articles (the forward view), we examine references to prior publications from specific countries cited in the most elite publications (the backward-citing-view). "Elite publications" are operationalized as the top-1% most-highly cited articles. Using the articles published from 2004 to 2013, we examine the research referenced in these works. Our results confirm the well-known fact that China has emerged to become a major player in science. However, China still belongs to the low contributors when countries are ranked as contributors to the cited references in top-1% articles. Using this perspective, the results do not support a decreasing trend for the USA; in fact, the USA exceeds expectations (compared to its publication share) in terms of references in the top-1% articles. Switzerland, Sweden, and the Netherlands also appear at the top of the list. However, the results for Germany are lower than statistically expected.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5868817?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lutz Bornmann
Caroline Wagner
Loet Leydesdorff
spellingShingle Lutz Bornmann
Caroline Wagner
Loet Leydesdorff
The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lutz Bornmann
Caroline Wagner
Loet Leydesdorff
author_sort Lutz Bornmann
title The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
title_short The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
title_full The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
title_fullStr The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
title_full_unstemmed The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
title_sort geography of references in elite articles: which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This study asks the question on which national "shoulders" the world's top-level research stands. Traditionally, the number of citations to national papers has been the evaluative measures of national scientific standings. We raise a different question: instead of analyzing the citations to a countries' articles (the forward view), we examine references to prior publications from specific countries cited in the most elite publications (the backward-citing-view). "Elite publications" are operationalized as the top-1% most-highly cited articles. Using the articles published from 2004 to 2013, we examine the research referenced in these works. Our results confirm the well-known fact that China has emerged to become a major player in science. However, China still belongs to the low contributors when countries are ranked as contributors to the cited references in top-1% articles. Using this perspective, the results do not support a decreasing trend for the USA; in fact, the USA exceeds expectations (compared to its publication share) in terms of references in the top-1% articles. Switzerland, Sweden, and the Netherlands also appear at the top of the list. However, the results for Germany are lower than statistically expected.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5868817?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lutzbornmann thegeographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge
AT carolinewagner thegeographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge
AT loetleydesdorff thegeographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge
AT lutzbornmann geographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge
AT carolinewagner geographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge
AT loetleydesdorff geographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge
_version_ 1725014091017224192