The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?
This study asks the question on which national "shoulders" the world's top-level research stands. Traditionally, the number of citations to national papers has been the evaluative measures of national scientific standings. We raise a different question: instead of analyzing the citati...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5868817?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-76a04fc74b1c458b9deee548c870e305 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-76a04fc74b1c458b9deee548c870e3052020-11-25T01:47:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01133e019480510.1371/journal.pone.0194805The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?Lutz BornmannCaroline WagnerLoet LeydesdorffThis study asks the question on which national "shoulders" the world's top-level research stands. Traditionally, the number of citations to national papers has been the evaluative measures of national scientific standings. We raise a different question: instead of analyzing the citations to a countries' articles (the forward view), we examine references to prior publications from specific countries cited in the most elite publications (the backward-citing-view). "Elite publications" are operationalized as the top-1% most-highly cited articles. Using the articles published from 2004 to 2013, we examine the research referenced in these works. Our results confirm the well-known fact that China has emerged to become a major player in science. However, China still belongs to the low contributors when countries are ranked as contributors to the cited references in top-1% articles. Using this perspective, the results do not support a decreasing trend for the USA; in fact, the USA exceeds expectations (compared to its publication share) in terms of references in the top-1% articles. Switzerland, Sweden, and the Netherlands also appear at the top of the list. However, the results for Germany are lower than statistically expected.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5868817?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lutz Bornmann Caroline Wagner Loet Leydesdorff |
spellingShingle |
Lutz Bornmann Caroline Wagner Loet Leydesdorff The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge? PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Lutz Bornmann Caroline Wagner Loet Leydesdorff |
author_sort |
Lutz Bornmann |
title |
The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge? |
title_short |
The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge? |
title_full |
The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge? |
title_fullStr |
The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge? |
title_sort |
geography of references in elite articles: which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge? |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
This study asks the question on which national "shoulders" the world's top-level research stands. Traditionally, the number of citations to national papers has been the evaluative measures of national scientific standings. We raise a different question: instead of analyzing the citations to a countries' articles (the forward view), we examine references to prior publications from specific countries cited in the most elite publications (the backward-citing-view). "Elite publications" are operationalized as the top-1% most-highly cited articles. Using the articles published from 2004 to 2013, we examine the research referenced in these works. Our results confirm the well-known fact that China has emerged to become a major player in science. However, China still belongs to the low contributors when countries are ranked as contributors to the cited references in top-1% articles. Using this perspective, the results do not support a decreasing trend for the USA; in fact, the USA exceeds expectations (compared to its publication share) in terms of references in the top-1% articles. Switzerland, Sweden, and the Netherlands also appear at the top of the list. However, the results for Germany are lower than statistically expected. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5868817?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lutzbornmann thegeographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge AT carolinewagner thegeographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge AT loetleydesdorff thegeographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge AT lutzbornmann geographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge AT carolinewagner geographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge AT loetleydesdorff geographyofreferencesinelitearticleswhichcountriescontributetothearchivesofknowledge |
_version_ |
1725014091017224192 |