Comparison of Computerized and Vvisual Texture Analysis of Liver Focal Lesions in MRI

Even though each the focal liver lesions image has, it special pattern but in most of case differentiation between them is not easy task for radiologist. It seems computer aided differentiation can be useful in this step of diagnostic. Two independent radiologist assessed slice of MR liver images an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A Gharbali, RA Lerski, SJ Gandy, R Bhat, P Clinch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2005-10-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/2462.pdf&manuscript_id=2462
id doaj-769f9c25e82f41a79008c414910604da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-769f9c25e82f41a79008c414910604da2020-12-02T07:29:10ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Public Health2251-60852005-10-0134Sup4243Comparison of Computerized and Vvisual Texture Analysis of Liver Focal Lesions in MRIA GharbaliRA LerskiSJ GandyR BhatP ClinchEven though each the focal liver lesions image has, it special pattern but in most of case differentiation between them is not easy task for radiologist. It seems computer aided differentiation can be useful in this step of diagnostic. Two independent radiologist assessed slice of MR liver images and twenty-three patients with focal liver lesions (3 Cyst, 6 Haemangioma and 14 Metastasis) and 10 normal livers were chosen for study. A texture analysis software and mathematical software were utilized to differentiate region of interest (ROI) among and in between ill and healthy liver slice images based on their differences in texture parameters. Linear discrimination analysis (LDA), Principle Component Analysis (PCA), combinations, and fusions of LDA and PCA were used as classification methods. Multiple ROIs were defined on control images to find out their best features data and linear discrimination functions for differentiation with high rate confidence. Sample images examined using the control set examination findings. The results then compared with radiologist reports. All classification methods allowed discrimination among and between healthy and focal lesion regions on the images. Automated texture analysis concurred with radiological diagnosis in all Cyst patients and all but one metastasis report. However, Haemangioma reports were classified as metastasis lesions. All samples of normal livers and normal parts of metastasis liver were correctly differentiated from metastasis. But more than 50% of patients reported as a metastasis diagnosed as normal. Comparison with visual diagnostic reports of MR liver images suggest that automated texture analysis has the potential to improve classification rates in the radiological diagnosis.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/2462.pdf&manuscript_id=2462Texture analysisMagnetic resonance imaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A Gharbali
RA Lerski
SJ Gandy
R Bhat
P Clinch
spellingShingle A Gharbali
RA Lerski
SJ Gandy
R Bhat
P Clinch
Comparison of Computerized and Vvisual Texture Analysis of Liver Focal Lesions in MRI
Iranian Journal of Public Health
Texture analysis
Magnetic resonance imaging
author_facet A Gharbali
RA Lerski
SJ Gandy
R Bhat
P Clinch
author_sort A Gharbali
title Comparison of Computerized and Vvisual Texture Analysis of Liver Focal Lesions in MRI
title_short Comparison of Computerized and Vvisual Texture Analysis of Liver Focal Lesions in MRI
title_full Comparison of Computerized and Vvisual Texture Analysis of Liver Focal Lesions in MRI
title_fullStr Comparison of Computerized and Vvisual Texture Analysis of Liver Focal Lesions in MRI
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Computerized and Vvisual Texture Analysis of Liver Focal Lesions in MRI
title_sort comparison of computerized and vvisual texture analysis of liver focal lesions in mri
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Iranian Journal of Public Health
issn 2251-6085
publishDate 2005-10-01
description Even though each the focal liver lesions image has, it special pattern but in most of case differentiation between them is not easy task for radiologist. It seems computer aided differentiation can be useful in this step of diagnostic. Two independent radiologist assessed slice of MR liver images and twenty-three patients with focal liver lesions (3 Cyst, 6 Haemangioma and 14 Metastasis) and 10 normal livers were chosen for study. A texture analysis software and mathematical software were utilized to differentiate region of interest (ROI) among and in between ill and healthy liver slice images based on their differences in texture parameters. Linear discrimination analysis (LDA), Principle Component Analysis (PCA), combinations, and fusions of LDA and PCA were used as classification methods. Multiple ROIs were defined on control images to find out their best features data and linear discrimination functions for differentiation with high rate confidence. Sample images examined using the control set examination findings. The results then compared with radiologist reports. All classification methods allowed discrimination among and between healthy and focal lesion regions on the images. Automated texture analysis concurred with radiological diagnosis in all Cyst patients and all but one metastasis report. However, Haemangioma reports were classified as metastasis lesions. All samples of normal livers and normal parts of metastasis liver were correctly differentiated from metastasis. But more than 50% of patients reported as a metastasis diagnosed as normal. Comparison with visual diagnostic reports of MR liver images suggest that automated texture analysis has the potential to improve classification rates in the radiological diagnosis.
topic Texture analysis
Magnetic resonance imaging
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/PdfMed.aspx?pdf_med=/upload_files/pdf/2462.pdf&manuscript_id=2462
work_keys_str_mv AT agharbali comparisonofcomputerizedandvvisualtextureanalysisofliverfocallesionsinmri
AT ralerski comparisonofcomputerizedandvvisualtextureanalysisofliverfocallesionsinmri
AT sjgandy comparisonofcomputerizedandvvisualtextureanalysisofliverfocallesionsinmri
AT rbhat comparisonofcomputerizedandvvisualtextureanalysisofliverfocallesionsinmri
AT pclinch comparisonofcomputerizedandvvisualtextureanalysisofliverfocallesionsinmri
_version_ 1724408227144138752