Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands

Purpose: The aim was to reach consensus in The Netherlands on which parameters should be used to evaluate breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) plans. Materials and methods: A Benchmark Case with delineated planning target volumes (PTVs) and Organs At Risk (OARs) was sent to all Dutch radiotherapy centres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coen Hurkmans, Cindy Duisters, Mieke Peters-Verhoeven, Liesbeth Boersma, Karolien Verhoeven, Nina Bijker, Koen Crama, Tonnis Nuver, Maurice van der Sangen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-09-01
Series:Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632421000275
id doaj-76937e587eea4673b175b737050a707d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76937e587eea4673b175b737050a707d2021-09-07T04:13:50ZengElsevierTechnical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology2405-63242021-09-01192632Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the NetherlandsCoen Hurkmans0Cindy Duisters1Mieke Peters-Verhoeven2Liesbeth Boersma3Karolien Verhoeven4Nina Bijker5Koen Crama6Tonnis Nuver7Maurice van der Sangen8Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Corresponding author at: Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, the Netherlands.Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the NetherlandsMaastricht University Medical Centre+, Dept. of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the NetherlandsMaastricht University Medical Centre+, Dept. of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, the NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, the NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, the NetherlandsRadiotherapiegroep, the NetherlandsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the NetherlandsPurpose: The aim was to reach consensus in The Netherlands on which parameters should be used to evaluate breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) plans. Materials and methods: A Benchmark Case with delineated planning target volumes (PTVs) and Organs At Risk (OARs) was sent to all Dutch radiotherapy centres in combination with a questionnaire, with the request to generate RT plans prescribing 15 times 2.67 Gy for four different treatment indications according to the institutional irradiation technique. The plans and accompanying questionnaire answers were analysed using descriptive statistics. These results, together with a harmonisation proposal, were sent to all centres. The proposal was discussed at a meeting of the Dutch Society of Radiation Oncology breast cancer platform. Distinct parameters were accepted if consensus on them was reached. Results: 19 out of 20 Dutch departments participated in this study. PTV coverage varied considerably, with D98% between 63% and 99% for the breast and between 37% and 97% for the internal mammary nodes (IMN). Also substantial OAR dose differences were observed, with e.g. mean heart doses ranging between 1.85 Gy and 5.42 Gy in case the IMN were included in the PTV. For evaluation of the PTVs D98%, D2% and Dmean were chosen to report on, with target values of ≥ 95% (90% for the PTV_IMN), ≤ 107%, and 99–101%, respectively. For OARs, consensus was reached on the parameters to be evaluated, without target values: Dmean of the heart, Dmean and V5% of the lungs, and in case of periclavicular radiotherapy V30Gy of the thyroid gland. For patients younger than 40 years a contralateral mean breast dose of ≤ 1 Gy was agreed upon. Conclusion: A new Dutch consensus guideline for evaluation of breast cancer RT plans has been established.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632421000275Breast cancerRadiotherapyTreatment planningConsensusGuidelineNational
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Coen Hurkmans
Cindy Duisters
Mieke Peters-Verhoeven
Liesbeth Boersma
Karolien Verhoeven
Nina Bijker
Koen Crama
Tonnis Nuver
Maurice van der Sangen
spellingShingle Coen Hurkmans
Cindy Duisters
Mieke Peters-Verhoeven
Liesbeth Boersma
Karolien Verhoeven
Nina Bijker
Koen Crama
Tonnis Nuver
Maurice van der Sangen
Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands
Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Breast cancer
Radiotherapy
Treatment planning
Consensus
Guideline
National
author_facet Coen Hurkmans
Cindy Duisters
Mieke Peters-Verhoeven
Liesbeth Boersma
Karolien Verhoeven
Nina Bijker
Koen Crama
Tonnis Nuver
Maurice van der Sangen
author_sort Coen Hurkmans
title Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands
title_short Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands
title_full Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands
title_fullStr Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands
title_sort harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the netherlands
publisher Elsevier
series Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
issn 2405-6324
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Purpose: The aim was to reach consensus in The Netherlands on which parameters should be used to evaluate breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) plans. Materials and methods: A Benchmark Case with delineated planning target volumes (PTVs) and Organs At Risk (OARs) was sent to all Dutch radiotherapy centres in combination with a questionnaire, with the request to generate RT plans prescribing 15 times 2.67 Gy for four different treatment indications according to the institutional irradiation technique. The plans and accompanying questionnaire answers were analysed using descriptive statistics. These results, together with a harmonisation proposal, were sent to all centres. The proposal was discussed at a meeting of the Dutch Society of Radiation Oncology breast cancer platform. Distinct parameters were accepted if consensus on them was reached. Results: 19 out of 20 Dutch departments participated in this study. PTV coverage varied considerably, with D98% between 63% and 99% for the breast and between 37% and 97% for the internal mammary nodes (IMN). Also substantial OAR dose differences were observed, with e.g. mean heart doses ranging between 1.85 Gy and 5.42 Gy in case the IMN were included in the PTV. For evaluation of the PTVs D98%, D2% and Dmean were chosen to report on, with target values of ≥ 95% (90% for the PTV_IMN), ≤ 107%, and 99–101%, respectively. For OARs, consensus was reached on the parameters to be evaluated, without target values: Dmean of the heart, Dmean and V5% of the lungs, and in case of periclavicular radiotherapy V30Gy of the thyroid gland. For patients younger than 40 years a contralateral mean breast dose of ≤ 1 Gy was agreed upon. Conclusion: A new Dutch consensus guideline for evaluation of breast cancer RT plans has been established.
topic Breast cancer
Radiotherapy
Treatment planning
Consensus
Guideline
National
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632421000275
work_keys_str_mv AT coenhurkmans harmonizationofbreastcancerradiotherapytreatmentplanninginthenetherlands
AT cindyduisters harmonizationofbreastcancerradiotherapytreatmentplanninginthenetherlands
AT miekepetersverhoeven harmonizationofbreastcancerradiotherapytreatmentplanninginthenetherlands
AT liesbethboersma harmonizationofbreastcancerradiotherapytreatmentplanninginthenetherlands
AT karolienverhoeven harmonizationofbreastcancerradiotherapytreatmentplanninginthenetherlands
AT ninabijker harmonizationofbreastcancerradiotherapytreatmentplanninginthenetherlands
AT koencrama harmonizationofbreastcancerradiotherapytreatmentplanninginthenetherlands
AT tonnisnuver harmonizationofbreastcancerradiotherapytreatmentplanninginthenetherlands
AT mauricevandersangen harmonizationofbreastcancerradiotherapytreatmentplanninginthenetherlands
_version_ 1717764908968312832