Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes

While research on wellbeing within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is an active space, a gap between research and practice persists. To tackle this, we sought to identify the practical needs of designers in taking wellbeing research into practice. We report on 15 semi-structured interviews with des...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dorian Peters, Naseem Ahmadpour, Rafael A. Calvo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/4/3/40
id doaj-767173b7b99a4788b50beadc5945bbdf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-767173b7b99a4788b50beadc5945bbdf2020-11-25T03:52:32ZengMDPI AGMultimodal Technologies and Interaction2414-40882020-07-014404010.3390/mti4030040Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and PrototypesDorian Peters0Naseem Ahmadpour1Rafael A. Calvo2Design Lab, Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, AustraliaDesign Lab, Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, AustraliaDyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 1AL, UKWhile research on wellbeing within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is an active space, a gap between research and practice persists. To tackle this, we sought to identify the practical needs of designers in taking wellbeing research into practice. We report on 15 semi-structured interviews with designers from four continents, yielding insights into design tool use generally and requirements for wellbeing design tools specifically. We then present five resulting design tool concepts, two of which were further developed into prototypes and tested in a workshop with 34 interaction design and HCI professionals. Findings include seven desirable features and three desirable characteristics for wellbeing-supportive design tools, including that these tools should satisfy the need for proof, buy-in, and tangibility. We also provide clarity around the notion of design for wellbeing and why it must be distinguished from design for positive emotions.https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/4/3/40design for wellbeingwellbeing-supportive designdesign toolstoolkitpositive computingpositive technology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dorian Peters
Naseem Ahmadpour
Rafael A. Calvo
spellingShingle Dorian Peters
Naseem Ahmadpour
Rafael A. Calvo
Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
design for wellbeing
wellbeing-supportive design
design tools
toolkit
positive computing
positive technology
author_facet Dorian Peters
Naseem Ahmadpour
Rafael A. Calvo
author_sort Dorian Peters
title Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes
title_short Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes
title_full Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes
title_fullStr Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes
title_full_unstemmed Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes
title_sort tools for wellbeing-supportive design: features, characteristics, and prototypes
publisher MDPI AG
series Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
issn 2414-4088
publishDate 2020-07-01
description While research on wellbeing within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is an active space, a gap between research and practice persists. To tackle this, we sought to identify the practical needs of designers in taking wellbeing research into practice. We report on 15 semi-structured interviews with designers from four continents, yielding insights into design tool use generally and requirements for wellbeing design tools specifically. We then present five resulting design tool concepts, two of which were further developed into prototypes and tested in a workshop with 34 interaction design and HCI professionals. Findings include seven desirable features and three desirable characteristics for wellbeing-supportive design tools, including that these tools should satisfy the need for proof, buy-in, and tangibility. We also provide clarity around the notion of design for wellbeing and why it must be distinguished from design for positive emotions.
topic design for wellbeing
wellbeing-supportive design
design tools
toolkit
positive computing
positive technology
url https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/4/3/40
work_keys_str_mv AT dorianpeters toolsforwellbeingsupportivedesignfeaturescharacteristicsandprototypes
AT naseemahmadpour toolsforwellbeingsupportivedesignfeaturescharacteristicsandprototypes
AT rafaelacalvo toolsforwellbeingsupportivedesignfeaturescharacteristicsandprototypes
_version_ 1724482419832127488