Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes
While research on wellbeing within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is an active space, a gap between research and practice persists. To tackle this, we sought to identify the practical needs of designers in taking wellbeing research into practice. We report on 15 semi-structured interviews with des...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Multimodal Technologies and Interaction |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/4/3/40 |
id |
doaj-767173b7b99a4788b50beadc5945bbdf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-767173b7b99a4788b50beadc5945bbdf2020-11-25T03:52:32ZengMDPI AGMultimodal Technologies and Interaction2414-40882020-07-014404010.3390/mti4030040Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and PrototypesDorian Peters0Naseem Ahmadpour1Rafael A. Calvo2Design Lab, Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, AustraliaDesign Lab, Sydney School of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, AustraliaDyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 1AL, UKWhile research on wellbeing within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is an active space, a gap between research and practice persists. To tackle this, we sought to identify the practical needs of designers in taking wellbeing research into practice. We report on 15 semi-structured interviews with designers from four continents, yielding insights into design tool use generally and requirements for wellbeing design tools specifically. We then present five resulting design tool concepts, two of which were further developed into prototypes and tested in a workshop with 34 interaction design and HCI professionals. Findings include seven desirable features and three desirable characteristics for wellbeing-supportive design tools, including that these tools should satisfy the need for proof, buy-in, and tangibility. We also provide clarity around the notion of design for wellbeing and why it must be distinguished from design for positive emotions.https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/4/3/40design for wellbeingwellbeing-supportive designdesign toolstoolkitpositive computingpositive technology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dorian Peters Naseem Ahmadpour Rafael A. Calvo |
spellingShingle |
Dorian Peters Naseem Ahmadpour Rafael A. Calvo Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes Multimodal Technologies and Interaction design for wellbeing wellbeing-supportive design design tools toolkit positive computing positive technology |
author_facet |
Dorian Peters Naseem Ahmadpour Rafael A. Calvo |
author_sort |
Dorian Peters |
title |
Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes |
title_short |
Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes |
title_full |
Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes |
title_fullStr |
Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tools for Wellbeing-Supportive Design: Features, Characteristics, and Prototypes |
title_sort |
tools for wellbeing-supportive design: features, characteristics, and prototypes |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction |
issn |
2414-4088 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
While research on wellbeing within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is an active space, a gap between research and practice persists. To tackle this, we sought to identify the practical needs of designers in taking wellbeing research into practice. We report on 15 semi-structured interviews with designers from four continents, yielding insights into design tool use generally and requirements for wellbeing design tools specifically. We then present five resulting design tool concepts, two of which were further developed into prototypes and tested in a workshop with 34 interaction design and HCI professionals. Findings include seven desirable features and three desirable characteristics for wellbeing-supportive design tools, including that these tools should satisfy the need for proof, buy-in, and tangibility. We also provide clarity around the notion of design for wellbeing and why it must be distinguished from design for positive emotions. |
topic |
design for wellbeing wellbeing-supportive design design tools toolkit positive computing positive technology |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/4/3/40 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dorianpeters toolsforwellbeingsupportivedesignfeaturescharacteristicsandprototypes AT naseemahmadpour toolsforwellbeingsupportivedesignfeaturescharacteristicsandprototypes AT rafaelacalvo toolsforwellbeingsupportivedesignfeaturescharacteristicsandprototypes |
_version_ |
1724482419832127488 |