Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions

Pieron’s and Chocholle’s seminal psychophysical work predicts that human response time to information relative to visual contrast and/or sound frequency decreases when contrast intensity or sound frequency increases. The goal of this study is to bring to the forefront the ability...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Birgitta Dresp-Langley, Marie Monfouga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-11-01
Series:Information
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/11/346
id doaj-766b701f73364f08abee68e8015ea006
record_format Article
spelling doaj-766b701f73364f08abee68e8015ea0062020-11-25T01:41:44ZengMDPI AGInformation2078-24892019-11-01101134610.3390/info10110346info10110346Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster DecisionsBirgitta Dresp-Langley0Marie Monfouga1Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7357 ICube Lab, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7357 ICube Lab, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, FrancePieron’s and Chocholle’s seminal psychophysical work predicts that human response time to information relative to visual contrast and/or sound frequency decreases when contrast intensity or sound frequency increases. The goal of this study is to bring to the forefront the ability of individuals to use visual contrast intensity and sound frequency in combination for faster perceptual decisions of relative depth (“nearer”) in planar (2D) object configurations based on physical variations in luminance contrast. Computer controlled images with two abstract patterns of varying contrast intensity, one on the left and one on the right, preceded or not by a pure tone of varying frequency, were shown to healthy young humans in controlled experimental sequences. Their task (two-alternative, forced-choice) was to decide as quickly as possible which of two patterns, the left or the right one, in a given image appeared to “stand out as if it were nearer” in terms of apparent (subjective) visual depth. The results showed that the combinations of varying relative visual contrast with sounds of varying frequency exploited here produced an additive effect on choice response times in terms of facilitation, where a stronger visual contrast combined with a higher sound frequency produced shorter forced-choice response times. This new effect is predicted by audio-visual probability summation.https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/11/346visual contrastperceived relative object depth2d imagessound frequencytwo-alternative forced-choiceresponse timeshigh-probability decisionreadiness to respondprobability summation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Birgitta Dresp-Langley
Marie Monfouga
spellingShingle Birgitta Dresp-Langley
Marie Monfouga
Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions
Information
visual contrast
perceived relative object depth
2d images
sound frequency
two-alternative forced-choice
response times
high-probability decision
readiness to respond
probability summation
author_facet Birgitta Dresp-Langley
Marie Monfouga
author_sort Birgitta Dresp-Langley
title Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions
title_short Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions
title_full Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions
title_fullStr Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions
title_full_unstemmed Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions
title_sort combining visual contrast information with sound can produce faster decisions
publisher MDPI AG
series Information
issn 2078-2489
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Pieron’s and Chocholle’s seminal psychophysical work predicts that human response time to information relative to visual contrast and/or sound frequency decreases when contrast intensity or sound frequency increases. The goal of this study is to bring to the forefront the ability of individuals to use visual contrast intensity and sound frequency in combination for faster perceptual decisions of relative depth (“nearer”) in planar (2D) object configurations based on physical variations in luminance contrast. Computer controlled images with two abstract patterns of varying contrast intensity, one on the left and one on the right, preceded or not by a pure tone of varying frequency, were shown to healthy young humans in controlled experimental sequences. Their task (two-alternative, forced-choice) was to decide as quickly as possible which of two patterns, the left or the right one, in a given image appeared to “stand out as if it were nearer” in terms of apparent (subjective) visual depth. The results showed that the combinations of varying relative visual contrast with sounds of varying frequency exploited here produced an additive effect on choice response times in terms of facilitation, where a stronger visual contrast combined with a higher sound frequency produced shorter forced-choice response times. This new effect is predicted by audio-visual probability summation.
topic visual contrast
perceived relative object depth
2d images
sound frequency
two-alternative forced-choice
response times
high-probability decision
readiness to respond
probability summation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/11/346
work_keys_str_mv AT birgittadresplangley combiningvisualcontrastinformationwithsoundcanproducefasterdecisions
AT mariemonfouga combiningvisualcontrastinformationwithsoundcanproducefasterdecisions
_version_ 1725040003517513728