Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions
Pieron’s and Chocholle’s seminal psychophysical work predicts that human response time to information relative to visual contrast and/or sound frequency decreases when contrast intensity or sound frequency increases. The goal of this study is to bring to the forefront the ability...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Information |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/11/346 |
id |
doaj-766b701f73364f08abee68e8015ea006 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-766b701f73364f08abee68e8015ea0062020-11-25T01:41:44ZengMDPI AGInformation2078-24892019-11-01101134610.3390/info10110346info10110346Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster DecisionsBirgitta Dresp-Langley0Marie Monfouga1Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7357 ICube Lab, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7357 ICube Lab, Strasbourg University, 67000 Strasbourg, FrancePieron’s and Chocholle’s seminal psychophysical work predicts that human response time to information relative to visual contrast and/or sound frequency decreases when contrast intensity or sound frequency increases. The goal of this study is to bring to the forefront the ability of individuals to use visual contrast intensity and sound frequency in combination for faster perceptual decisions of relative depth (“nearer”) in planar (2D) object configurations based on physical variations in luminance contrast. Computer controlled images with two abstract patterns of varying contrast intensity, one on the left and one on the right, preceded or not by a pure tone of varying frequency, were shown to healthy young humans in controlled experimental sequences. Their task (two-alternative, forced-choice) was to decide as quickly as possible which of two patterns, the left or the right one, in a given image appeared to “stand out as if it were nearer” in terms of apparent (subjective) visual depth. The results showed that the combinations of varying relative visual contrast with sounds of varying frequency exploited here produced an additive effect on choice response times in terms of facilitation, where a stronger visual contrast combined with a higher sound frequency produced shorter forced-choice response times. This new effect is predicted by audio-visual probability summation.https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/11/346visual contrastperceived relative object depth2d imagessound frequencytwo-alternative forced-choiceresponse timeshigh-probability decisionreadiness to respondprobability summation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Birgitta Dresp-Langley Marie Monfouga |
spellingShingle |
Birgitta Dresp-Langley Marie Monfouga Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions Information visual contrast perceived relative object depth 2d images sound frequency two-alternative forced-choice response times high-probability decision readiness to respond probability summation |
author_facet |
Birgitta Dresp-Langley Marie Monfouga |
author_sort |
Birgitta Dresp-Langley |
title |
Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions |
title_short |
Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions |
title_full |
Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions |
title_fullStr |
Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Combining Visual Contrast Information with Sound Can Produce Faster Decisions |
title_sort |
combining visual contrast information with sound can produce faster decisions |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Information |
issn |
2078-2489 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
Pieron’s and Chocholle’s seminal psychophysical work predicts that human response time to information relative to visual contrast and/or sound frequency decreases when contrast intensity or sound frequency increases. The goal of this study is to bring to the forefront the ability of individuals to use visual contrast intensity and sound frequency in combination for faster perceptual decisions of relative depth (“nearer”) in planar (2D) object configurations based on physical variations in luminance contrast. Computer controlled images with two abstract patterns of varying contrast intensity, one on the left and one on the right, preceded or not by a pure tone of varying frequency, were shown to healthy young humans in controlled experimental sequences. Their task (two-alternative, forced-choice) was to decide as quickly as possible which of two patterns, the left or the right one, in a given image appeared to “stand out as if it were nearer” in terms of apparent (subjective) visual depth. The results showed that the combinations of varying relative visual contrast with sounds of varying frequency exploited here produced an additive effect on choice response times in terms of facilitation, where a stronger visual contrast combined with a higher sound frequency produced shorter forced-choice response times. This new effect is predicted by audio-visual probability summation. |
topic |
visual contrast perceived relative object depth 2d images sound frequency two-alternative forced-choice response times high-probability decision readiness to respond probability summation |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/11/346 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT birgittadresplangley combiningvisualcontrastinformationwithsoundcanproducefasterdecisions AT mariemonfouga combiningvisualcontrastinformationwithsoundcanproducefasterdecisions |
_version_ |
1725040003517513728 |