Joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: what is in it for science?

Both in literature and in practice, it is claimed that joint knowledge production (JKP) by researchers, policy makers, and other societal actors is necessary to make science relevant for addressing climate adaptation. Although recent assessments of JKP projects have provided some arguments in favor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dries Hegger, Carel Dieperink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2015-12-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss4/art1/
id doaj-76600ace681a44c4ac5a015dcb0c2aa9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76600ace681a44c4ac5a015dcb0c2aa92020-11-24T23:57:58ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872015-12-01204110.5751/ES-07929-2004017929Joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: what is in it for science?Dries Hegger0Carel Dieperink1Environmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht UniversityEnvironmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht UniversityBoth in literature and in practice, it is claimed that joint knowledge production (JKP) by researchers, policy makers, and other societal actors is necessary to make science relevant for addressing climate adaptation. Although recent assessments of JKP projects have provided some arguments in favor of their societal merit, much less is known about their scientific merit. We explored the latter by developing a conceptual framework addressing characteristics of doing JKP as well as hypotheses on potential merits and pitfalls in terms of its process, output, and impact for science. Semistructured interviews with six environmental science research leaders as well as discussions with five researchers involved in past JKP projects were used to start operationalizing the framework into criteria and compiling a survey. This survey was filled out by 144 researchers involved in Knowledge for Climate, a large Dutch multiactor research program. The findings suggest that, at least in the context of recently carried out Dutch climate adaptation projects, JKP contributes to a broader empirical knowledge base; more reflexivity on the part of researchers; and more publications for policy makers. We conclude this paper by formulating next research steps, including evaluating what would be a proper balance between more versus less participatory forms of scientific knowledge production.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss4/art1/climate change adaptationjoint knowledge production (JKP)science studiessurveyThe Netherlands
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dries Hegger
Carel Dieperink
spellingShingle Dries Hegger
Carel Dieperink
Joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: what is in it for science?
Ecology and Society
climate change adaptation
joint knowledge production (JKP)
science studies
survey
The Netherlands
author_facet Dries Hegger
Carel Dieperink
author_sort Dries Hegger
title Joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: what is in it for science?
title_short Joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: what is in it for science?
title_full Joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: what is in it for science?
title_fullStr Joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: what is in it for science?
title_full_unstemmed Joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: what is in it for science?
title_sort joint knowledge production for climate change adaptation: what is in it for science?
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Both in literature and in practice, it is claimed that joint knowledge production (JKP) by researchers, policy makers, and other societal actors is necessary to make science relevant for addressing climate adaptation. Although recent assessments of JKP projects have provided some arguments in favor of their societal merit, much less is known about their scientific merit. We explored the latter by developing a conceptual framework addressing characteristics of doing JKP as well as hypotheses on potential merits and pitfalls in terms of its process, output, and impact for science. Semistructured interviews with six environmental science research leaders as well as discussions with five researchers involved in past JKP projects were used to start operationalizing the framework into criteria and compiling a survey. This survey was filled out by 144 researchers involved in Knowledge for Climate, a large Dutch multiactor research program. The findings suggest that, at least in the context of recently carried out Dutch climate adaptation projects, JKP contributes to a broader empirical knowledge base; more reflexivity on the part of researchers; and more publications for policy makers. We conclude this paper by formulating next research steps, including evaluating what would be a proper balance between more versus less participatory forms of scientific knowledge production.
topic climate change adaptation
joint knowledge production (JKP)
science studies
survey
The Netherlands
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss4/art1/
work_keys_str_mv AT drieshegger jointknowledgeproductionforclimatechangeadaptationwhatisinitforscience
AT careldieperink jointknowledgeproductionforclimatechangeadaptationwhatisinitforscience
_version_ 1716245360241803264