Conducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in COVID-19 personal protective equipment - a semi-structured interview

Abstract Background The risk of COVID-19 transmission to healthcare professionals is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. The wearing of personal protective equipment (PPE) presents a number of potential challenges to responders that may impact upon the management of patients in a multi-ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Raitt, Ben Watts, Jaspreet Rayet, Mark Hodkinson, David Zideman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-01-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00838-w
id doaj-764dcc2b475a4c2ab334f0427cfb3b99
record_format Article
spelling doaj-764dcc2b475a4c2ab334f0427cfb3b992021-01-31T16:39:59ZengBMCScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine1757-72412021-01-012911410.1186/s13049-021-00838-wConducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in COVID-19 personal protective equipment - a semi-structured interviewJames Raitt0Ben Watts1Jaspreet Rayet2Mark Hodkinson3David Zideman4Thames Valley Air AmbulanceThames Valley Air AmbulanceThames Valley Air AmbulanceThames Valley Air AmbulanceThames Valley Air AmbulanceAbstract Background The risk of COVID-19 transmission to healthcare professionals is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. The wearing of personal protective equipment (PPE) presents a number of potential challenges to responders that may impact upon the management of patients in a multi-casualty incident. This report describes a multi-agency multi-casualty incident. It identifies learning points specifically related to the challenges of conducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in COVID-19 PPE. Case The multi casualty incident in Reading, UK on the 20 June 2020 involved six stab injury victims and was attended by four pre-hospital critical care teams. This was the first conventional multi-casualty incident that pre-hospital critical care teams had attended during the COVID-19 era and it was conducted in COVID-19 PPE (1). The scene was an urban park where three patients were confirmed to be in Traumatic Cardiac Arrest (TCA) from stab wounds and another three patients had also suffered stab injuries. By the time the incident had concluded three patients were pronounced dead at the scene. Two patients were transported to the local trauma unit and one patient was transported to the regional Major Trauma Centre depending on the severity of their injuries. Conclusions We conducted a semi structured telephone interview with the critical care clinicians who were involved in the incident. The interviews focused specifically on the challenges of responding whilst wearing COVID-19 PPE, rather than the wider challenges of responding to such an incident. The key learning points identified were: Improving the identifiability of clinicians in level 3 PPE wearing identification tabards using visible labelling on PPE suits Improving communication by radio using a belt to carry the radio using an earpiece and push to talk system. Training in conducting multi casualty incidents in level 3 PPE.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00838-wCOVID-19Multi casualty incidentPersonal Protective Equipment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Raitt
Ben Watts
Jaspreet Rayet
Mark Hodkinson
David Zideman
spellingShingle James Raitt
Ben Watts
Jaspreet Rayet
Mark Hodkinson
David Zideman
Conducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in COVID-19 personal protective equipment - a semi-structured interview
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
COVID-19
Multi casualty incident
Personal Protective Equipment
author_facet James Raitt
Ben Watts
Jaspreet Rayet
Mark Hodkinson
David Zideman
author_sort James Raitt
title Conducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in COVID-19 personal protective equipment - a semi-structured interview
title_short Conducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in COVID-19 personal protective equipment - a semi-structured interview
title_full Conducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in COVID-19 personal protective equipment - a semi-structured interview
title_fullStr Conducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in COVID-19 personal protective equipment - a semi-structured interview
title_full_unstemmed Conducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in COVID-19 personal protective equipment - a semi-structured interview
title_sort conducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in covid-19 personal protective equipment - a semi-structured interview
publisher BMC
series Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
issn 1757-7241
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract Background The risk of COVID-19 transmission to healthcare professionals is likely to continue for the foreseeable future. The wearing of personal protective equipment (PPE) presents a number of potential challenges to responders that may impact upon the management of patients in a multi-casualty incident. This report describes a multi-agency multi-casualty incident. It identifies learning points specifically related to the challenges of conducting a conventional multi-casualty incident in COVID-19 PPE. Case The multi casualty incident in Reading, UK on the 20 June 2020 involved six stab injury victims and was attended by four pre-hospital critical care teams. This was the first conventional multi-casualty incident that pre-hospital critical care teams had attended during the COVID-19 era and it was conducted in COVID-19 PPE (1). The scene was an urban park where three patients were confirmed to be in Traumatic Cardiac Arrest (TCA) from stab wounds and another three patients had also suffered stab injuries. By the time the incident had concluded three patients were pronounced dead at the scene. Two patients were transported to the local trauma unit and one patient was transported to the regional Major Trauma Centre depending on the severity of their injuries. Conclusions We conducted a semi structured telephone interview with the critical care clinicians who were involved in the incident. The interviews focused specifically on the challenges of responding whilst wearing COVID-19 PPE, rather than the wider challenges of responding to such an incident. The key learning points identified were: Improving the identifiability of clinicians in level 3 PPE wearing identification tabards using visible labelling on PPE suits Improving communication by radio using a belt to carry the radio using an earpiece and push to talk system. Training in conducting multi casualty incidents in level 3 PPE.
topic COVID-19
Multi casualty incident
Personal Protective Equipment
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00838-w
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesraitt conductingaconventionalmulticasualtyincidentincovid19personalprotectiveequipmentasemistructuredinterview
AT benwatts conductingaconventionalmulticasualtyincidentincovid19personalprotectiveequipmentasemistructuredinterview
AT jaspreetrayet conductingaconventionalmulticasualtyincidentincovid19personalprotectiveequipmentasemistructuredinterview
AT markhodkinson conductingaconventionalmulticasualtyincidentincovid19personalprotectiveequipmentasemistructuredinterview
AT davidzideman conductingaconventionalmulticasualtyincidentincovid19personalprotectiveequipmentasemistructuredinterview
_version_ 1724316099806232576