NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018.

Total NIH funding dollars have increased from 2009-2018. We questioned whether this growth has occurred proportionately around the country and throughout allopathic medical schools. Therefore, we compared the trend in NIH grant funding from 2009 to 2018 for United States allopathic medical schools a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paige Noble, Patrick Ten Eyck, Robert Roskoski, J Brooks Jackson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233367
id doaj-764d5c6fd1a54544bb9c8dda1b1b713c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-764d5c6fd1a54544bb9c8dda1b1b713c2021-03-03T22:17:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01156e023336710.1371/journal.pone.0233367NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018.Paige NoblePatrick Ten EyckRobert RoskoskiJ Brooks JacksonTotal NIH funding dollars have increased from 2009-2018. We questioned whether this growth has occurred proportionately around the country and throughout allopathic medical schools. Therefore, we compared the trend in NIH grant funding from 2009 to 2018 for United States allopathic medical schools among historically top-funded schools, private and public schools, and by region of the country. Changes in both unadjusted and real funding dollars over time revealed a significant difference. Region was the only significant factor for mean percent change in funding from 2009-2018, with the Western region showing a 33.79% increase in purchasing power. The Northeastern region showed a -6.64% decrease in purchasing power while the Central and Southern regions reported changes of 2.46% and -6.08%, respectively. The mean percent increases were more proportional and nonsignificant in the public vs. private institutions comparison, at -3.41% and 4.75%, respectively. Likewise, the top-funded institutions vs. other institutions comparisons demonstrated modest, nonsignificant differences. However, although the relative changes might be proportional, the absolute increases evidence a pattern of growing cumulative advantage that favor the highest-funded institutions and private institutions. The potential consequences of this disproportionate increase include health science education, biomedical research, and patient access disparities in large parts of the country. The NIH and the scientific community should explore potential solutions in its funding models.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233367
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paige Noble
Patrick Ten Eyck
Robert Roskoski
J Brooks Jackson
spellingShingle Paige Noble
Patrick Ten Eyck
Robert Roskoski
J Brooks Jackson
NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Paige Noble
Patrick Ten Eyck
Robert Roskoski
J Brooks Jackson
author_sort Paige Noble
title NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018.
title_short NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018.
title_full NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018.
title_fullStr NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018.
title_full_unstemmed NIH funding trends to US medical schools from 2009 to 2018.
title_sort nih funding trends to us medical schools from 2009 to 2018.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Total NIH funding dollars have increased from 2009-2018. We questioned whether this growth has occurred proportionately around the country and throughout allopathic medical schools. Therefore, we compared the trend in NIH grant funding from 2009 to 2018 for United States allopathic medical schools among historically top-funded schools, private and public schools, and by region of the country. Changes in both unadjusted and real funding dollars over time revealed a significant difference. Region was the only significant factor for mean percent change in funding from 2009-2018, with the Western region showing a 33.79% increase in purchasing power. The Northeastern region showed a -6.64% decrease in purchasing power while the Central and Southern regions reported changes of 2.46% and -6.08%, respectively. The mean percent increases were more proportional and nonsignificant in the public vs. private institutions comparison, at -3.41% and 4.75%, respectively. Likewise, the top-funded institutions vs. other institutions comparisons demonstrated modest, nonsignificant differences. However, although the relative changes might be proportional, the absolute increases evidence a pattern of growing cumulative advantage that favor the highest-funded institutions and private institutions. The potential consequences of this disproportionate increase include health science education, biomedical research, and patient access disparities in large parts of the country. The NIH and the scientific community should explore potential solutions in its funding models.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233367
work_keys_str_mv AT paigenoble nihfundingtrendstousmedicalschoolsfrom2009to2018
AT patrickteneyck nihfundingtrendstousmedicalschoolsfrom2009to2018
AT robertroskoski nihfundingtrendstousmedicalschoolsfrom2009to2018
AT jbrooksjackson nihfundingtrendstousmedicalschoolsfrom2009to2018
_version_ 1714812862379065344