Virtual Water and Water Footprints: Overreaching Into the Discourse on Sustainability, Efficiency, and Equity

The notions of virtual water and water footprints were introduced originally to bring attention to the large amounts of water required to produce crops and livestock. Recently, several authors have begun applying those notions in efforts to describe efficiency, equity, and the sustainability of reso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dennis Wichelns
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Water Alternatives Association 2015-10-01
Series:Water Alternatives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol8/v8issue3/298-a8-3-6/file
id doaj-764d36cb6ee64619b8af353b815a4901
record_format Article
spelling doaj-764d36cb6ee64619b8af353b815a49012020-11-24T20:50:04ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752015-10-0183397414Virtual Water and Water Footprints: Overreaching Into the Discourse on Sustainability, Efficiency, and EquityDennis Wichelns0Bloomington, Indiana, USAThe notions of virtual water and water footprints were introduced originally to bring attention to the large amounts of water required to produce crops and livestock. Recently, several authors have begun applying those notions in efforts to describe efficiency, equity, and the sustainability of resources and production activities. In this paper, I describe why the notions of virtual water and water footprints are not appropriate for analysing issues pertaining to those topics. Both notions lack a supporting conceptual framework and they contain too little information to enhance understanding of important policy issues. Neither notion accounts for the opportunity cost or scarcity value of water in any setting, or the impacts of water availability and use on livelihoods. In addition, countries trade in goods and services – not in crop and livestock water requirements. Thus, the notions of virtual water and water footprints cannot provide helpful insight regarding the sustainability of water use, economic efficiency, or social equity. Gaining such insight requires the application of legitimate conceptual frameworks, representing a broad range of perspectives from the physical and social sciences, with due consideration of dynamics, uncertainty, and the impacts of policy choices on livelihoods and natural resources.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol8/v8issue3/298-a8-3-6/fileAgricultureeconomicsfood securitylivelihoodsrisktradeuncertainty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dennis Wichelns
spellingShingle Dennis Wichelns
Virtual Water and Water Footprints: Overreaching Into the Discourse on Sustainability, Efficiency, and Equity
Water Alternatives
Agriculture
economics
food security
livelihoods
risk
trade
uncertainty
author_facet Dennis Wichelns
author_sort Dennis Wichelns
title Virtual Water and Water Footprints: Overreaching Into the Discourse on Sustainability, Efficiency, and Equity
title_short Virtual Water and Water Footprints: Overreaching Into the Discourse on Sustainability, Efficiency, and Equity
title_full Virtual Water and Water Footprints: Overreaching Into the Discourse on Sustainability, Efficiency, and Equity
title_fullStr Virtual Water and Water Footprints: Overreaching Into the Discourse on Sustainability, Efficiency, and Equity
title_full_unstemmed Virtual Water and Water Footprints: Overreaching Into the Discourse on Sustainability, Efficiency, and Equity
title_sort virtual water and water footprints: overreaching into the discourse on sustainability, efficiency, and equity
publisher Water Alternatives Association
series Water Alternatives
issn 1965-0175
1965-0175
publishDate 2015-10-01
description The notions of virtual water and water footprints were introduced originally to bring attention to the large amounts of water required to produce crops and livestock. Recently, several authors have begun applying those notions in efforts to describe efficiency, equity, and the sustainability of resources and production activities. In this paper, I describe why the notions of virtual water and water footprints are not appropriate for analysing issues pertaining to those topics. Both notions lack a supporting conceptual framework and they contain too little information to enhance understanding of important policy issues. Neither notion accounts for the opportunity cost or scarcity value of water in any setting, or the impacts of water availability and use on livelihoods. In addition, countries trade in goods and services – not in crop and livestock water requirements. Thus, the notions of virtual water and water footprints cannot provide helpful insight regarding the sustainability of water use, economic efficiency, or social equity. Gaining such insight requires the application of legitimate conceptual frameworks, representing a broad range of perspectives from the physical and social sciences, with due consideration of dynamics, uncertainty, and the impacts of policy choices on livelihoods and natural resources.
topic Agriculture
economics
food security
livelihoods
risk
trade
uncertainty
url http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol8/v8issue3/298-a8-3-6/file
work_keys_str_mv AT denniswichelns virtualwaterandwaterfootprintsoverreachingintothediscourseonsustainabilityefficiencyandequity
_version_ 1716804761521487872