(De)Centralization of the Global Informational Ecosystem
Centralization and decentralization are key concepts in debates that focus on the (anti)democratic character of digital societies. Centralization is understood as the control over communication and data flows, and decentralization as giving it (back) to users. Communication and media research focuse...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Media and Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1067 |
id |
doaj-763d7643f95c4ded9a7d325e57265f66 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-763d7643f95c4ded9a7d325e57265f662020-11-25T00:46:07ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392017-09-0153374810.17645/mac.v5i3.1067542(De)Centralization of the Global Informational EcosystemJohanna Möller0M. Bjørn von Rimscha1Department of Communication, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, GermanyDepartment of Communication, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, GermanyCentralization and decentralization are key concepts in debates that focus on the (anti)democratic character of digital societies. Centralization is understood as the control over communication and data flows, and decentralization as giving it (back) to users. Communication and media research focuses on centralization put forward by dominant digital media platforms, such as Facebook and Google, and governments. Decentralization is investigated regarding its potential in civil society, i.e., hacktivism, (encryption) technologies, and grass-root technology movements. As content-based media companies increasingly engage with technology, they move into the focus of critical media studies. Moreover, as formerly nationally oriented companies now compete with global media platforms, they share several interests with civil society decentralization agents. Based on 26 qualitative interviews with leading media managers, we investigate (de)centralization strategies applied by content-oriented media companies. Theoretically, this perspective on media companies as agents of (de)centralization expands (de)centralization research beyond traditional democratic stakeholders by considering economic actors within the “global informational ecosystem” (Birkinbine, Gómez, & Wasko, 2017). We provide a three-dimensional framework to empirically investigate (de)centralization. From critical media studies, we borrow the (de)centralization of data and infrastructures, from media business research, the (de)centralization of content distribution.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1067business modelscentralizationcontent-oriented media companiesdecentralizationdigital media platformsdistributionFacebookGoogletechnology infrastructures |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Johanna Möller M. Bjørn von Rimscha |
spellingShingle |
Johanna Möller M. Bjørn von Rimscha (De)Centralization of the Global Informational Ecosystem Media and Communication business models centralization content-oriented media companies decentralization digital media platforms distribution technology infrastructures |
author_facet |
Johanna Möller M. Bjørn von Rimscha |
author_sort |
Johanna Möller |
title |
(De)Centralization of the Global Informational Ecosystem |
title_short |
(De)Centralization of the Global Informational Ecosystem |
title_full |
(De)Centralization of the Global Informational Ecosystem |
title_fullStr |
(De)Centralization of the Global Informational Ecosystem |
title_full_unstemmed |
(De)Centralization of the Global Informational Ecosystem |
title_sort |
(de)centralization of the global informational ecosystem |
publisher |
Cogitatio |
series |
Media and Communication |
issn |
2183-2439 |
publishDate |
2017-09-01 |
description |
Centralization and decentralization are key concepts in debates that focus on the (anti)democratic character of digital societies. Centralization is understood as the control over communication and data flows, and decentralization as giving it (back) to users. Communication and media research focuses on centralization put forward by dominant digital media platforms, such as Facebook and Google, and governments. Decentralization is investigated regarding its potential in civil society, i.e., hacktivism, (encryption) technologies, and grass-root technology movements. As content-based media companies increasingly engage with technology, they move into the focus of critical media studies. Moreover, as formerly nationally oriented companies now compete with global media platforms, they share several interests with civil society decentralization agents. Based on 26 qualitative interviews with leading media managers, we investigate (de)centralization strategies applied by content-oriented media companies. Theoretically, this perspective on media companies as agents of (de)centralization expands (de)centralization research beyond traditional democratic stakeholders by considering economic actors within the “global informational ecosystem” (Birkinbine, Gómez, & Wasko, 2017). We provide a three-dimensional framework to empirically investigate (de)centralization. From critical media studies, we borrow the (de)centralization of data and infrastructures, from media business research, the (de)centralization of content distribution. |
topic |
business models centralization content-oriented media companies decentralization digital media platforms distribution technology infrastructures |
url |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1067 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johannamoller decentralizationoftheglobalinformationalecosystem AT mbjørnvonrimscha decentralizationoftheglobalinformationalecosystem |
_version_ |
1725266839614783488 |