¿Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard Wettstein

In this paper I focus my attention on the proposal given by Howard Wettstein in 1980 to the cognitive phenomenon stated by Gottlob Frege in his paper “On sense and reference”. I offer three arguments in order to show that his answer does not weaken this phenomenon. Particularly, I defend three ideas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Suarez-Rivero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2016-09-01
Series:Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/42865
id doaj-7630c08db15d4e36b94ea290a05e6080
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7630c08db15d4e36b94ea290a05e60802020-11-25T01:54:18ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaPrincipia: An International Journal of Epistemology1414-42471808-17112016-09-0120342745310.5007/808-1711.2016v20n3p42726042¿Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard WettsteinDavid Suarez-RiveroIn this paper I focus my attention on the proposal given by Howard Wettstein in 1980 to the cognitive phenomenon stated by Gottlob Frege in his paper “On sense and reference”. I offer three arguments in order to show that his answer does not weaken this phenomenon. Particularly, I defend three ideas: first, it is legitimate that philosophical semantics, in contrast with what Wettstein defends, provides an answer to the cognitive phenomenon; second, Wettstein does not conceive Frege’s argument correctly by considering it generates a semantic theory from a purely mentalist phenomenon; third, the explanation supplied by Wettstein is assumed by Frege when he states the phenomenon.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/42865Howard WettsteinFrege’s puzzleCognitive valuePhilosophical semanticsCognitive scienceCognitive significance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Suarez-Rivero
spellingShingle David Suarez-Rivero
¿Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard Wettstein
Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology
Howard Wettstein
Frege’s puzzle
Cognitive value
Philosophical semantics
Cognitive science
Cognitive significance
author_facet David Suarez-Rivero
author_sort David Suarez-Rivero
title ¿Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard Wettstein
title_short ¿Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard Wettstein
title_full ¿Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard Wettstein
title_fullStr ¿Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard Wettstein
title_full_unstemmed ¿Está disuelto el puzzle de Frege? Tres objeciones a Howard Wettstein
title_sort ¿está disuelto el puzzle de frege? tres objeciones a howard wettstein
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
series Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology
issn 1414-4247
1808-1711
publishDate 2016-09-01
description In this paper I focus my attention on the proposal given by Howard Wettstein in 1980 to the cognitive phenomenon stated by Gottlob Frege in his paper “On sense and reference”. I offer three arguments in order to show that his answer does not weaken this phenomenon. Particularly, I defend three ideas: first, it is legitimate that philosophical semantics, in contrast with what Wettstein defends, provides an answer to the cognitive phenomenon; second, Wettstein does not conceive Frege’s argument correctly by considering it generates a semantic theory from a purely mentalist phenomenon; third, the explanation supplied by Wettstein is assumed by Frege when he states the phenomenon.
topic Howard Wettstein
Frege’s puzzle
Cognitive value
Philosophical semantics
Cognitive science
Cognitive significance
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/42865
work_keys_str_mv AT davidsuarezrivero estadisueltoelpuzzledefregetresobjecionesahowardwettstein
_version_ 1724987970285469696