Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises?
Our study combines machine learning techniques and dynamic moving window and expanding window methods to predict crises in the US natural gas market. Specifically, as machine learning models, we employ extreme gradient boosting (XGboost), support vector machines (SVMs), a logistic regression (LogR),...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2371 |
id |
doaj-761f601530a34cd3adcef69525c26053 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-761f601530a34cd3adcef69525c260532020-11-25T02:58:13ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-05-01132371237110.3390/en13092371Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises?Wenting Zhang0Shigeyuki Hamori1Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University, 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada-Ku, Kobe 657-8501, JapanGraduate School of Economics, Kobe University, 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada-Ku, Kobe 657-8501, JapanOur study combines machine learning techniques and dynamic moving window and expanding window methods to predict crises in the US natural gas market. Specifically, as machine learning models, we employ extreme gradient boosting (XGboost), support vector machines (SVMs), a logistic regression (LogR), random forests (RFs), and neural networks (NNs). The data set used to develop the model covers the period 1994 to 2019 and contains 121 explanatory variables, including those related to crude oil, stock markets, US bond and gold futures, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) index, and agriculture futures. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to combine machine learning techniques with dynamic approaches to predict US natural gas crises. To improve the model’s prediction accuracy, we applied a suite of parameter-tuning methods (e.g., grid-search) to select the best-performing hyperparameters for each model. Our empirical results demonstrated very good prediction accuracy for US natural gas crises when combining the XGboost model with the dynamic moving window method. We believe our findings will be useful to investors wanting to diversify their portfolios, as well as to policymakers wanting to take preemptive action to reduce losses.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2371dynamic approachesforecastinglogistic regressionrandom forestssupport vector machinesUS natural gas crises |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wenting Zhang Shigeyuki Hamori |
spellingShingle |
Wenting Zhang Shigeyuki Hamori Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises? Energies dynamic approaches forecasting logistic regression random forests support vector machines US natural gas crises |
author_facet |
Wenting Zhang Shigeyuki Hamori |
author_sort |
Wenting Zhang |
title |
Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises? |
title_short |
Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises? |
title_full |
Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises? |
title_fullStr |
Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises? |
title_sort |
do machine learning techniques and dynamic methods help forecast us natural gas crises? |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
Our study combines machine learning techniques and dynamic moving window and expanding window methods to predict crises in the US natural gas market. Specifically, as machine learning models, we employ extreme gradient boosting (XGboost), support vector machines (SVMs), a logistic regression (LogR), random forests (RFs), and neural networks (NNs). The data set used to develop the model covers the period 1994 to 2019 and contains 121 explanatory variables, including those related to crude oil, stock markets, US bond and gold futures, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) index, and agriculture futures. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to combine machine learning techniques with dynamic approaches to predict US natural gas crises. To improve the model’s prediction accuracy, we applied a suite of parameter-tuning methods (e.g., grid-search) to select the best-performing hyperparameters for each model. Our empirical results demonstrated very good prediction accuracy for US natural gas crises when combining the XGboost model with the dynamic moving window method. We believe our findings will be useful to investors wanting to diversify their portfolios, as well as to policymakers wanting to take preemptive action to reduce losses. |
topic |
dynamic approaches forecasting logistic regression random forests support vector machines US natural gas crises |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2371 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wentingzhang domachinelearningtechniquesanddynamicmethodshelpforecastusnaturalgascrises AT shigeyukihamori domachinelearningtechniquesanddynamicmethodshelpforecastusnaturalgascrises |
_version_ |
1724707836089335808 |