Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises?

Our study combines machine learning techniques and dynamic moving window and expanding window methods to predict crises in the US natural gas market. Specifically, as machine learning models, we employ extreme gradient boosting (XGboost), support vector machines (SVMs), a logistic regression (LogR),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wenting Zhang, Shigeyuki Hamori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2371
id doaj-761f601530a34cd3adcef69525c26053
record_format Article
spelling doaj-761f601530a34cd3adcef69525c260532020-11-25T02:58:13ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-05-01132371237110.3390/en13092371Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises?Wenting Zhang0Shigeyuki Hamori1Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University, 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada-Ku, Kobe 657-8501, JapanGraduate School of Economics, Kobe University, 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada-Ku, Kobe 657-8501, JapanOur study combines machine learning techniques and dynamic moving window and expanding window methods to predict crises in the US natural gas market. Specifically, as machine learning models, we employ extreme gradient boosting (XGboost), support vector machines (SVMs), a logistic regression (LogR), random forests (RFs), and neural networks (NNs). The data set used to develop the model covers the period 1994 to 2019 and contains 121 explanatory variables, including those related to crude oil, stock markets, US bond and gold futures, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) index, and agriculture futures. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to combine machine learning techniques with dynamic approaches to predict US natural gas crises. To improve the model’s prediction accuracy, we applied a suite of parameter-tuning methods (e.g., grid-search) to select the best-performing hyperparameters for each model. Our empirical results demonstrated very good prediction accuracy for US natural gas crises when combining the XGboost model with the dynamic moving window method. We believe our findings will be useful to investors wanting to diversify their portfolios, as well as to policymakers wanting to take preemptive action to reduce losses.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2371dynamic approachesforecastinglogistic regressionrandom forestssupport vector machinesUS natural gas crises
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wenting Zhang
Shigeyuki Hamori
spellingShingle Wenting Zhang
Shigeyuki Hamori
Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises?
Energies
dynamic approaches
forecasting
logistic regression
random forests
support vector machines
US natural gas crises
author_facet Wenting Zhang
Shigeyuki Hamori
author_sort Wenting Zhang
title Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises?
title_short Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises?
title_full Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises?
title_fullStr Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises?
title_full_unstemmed Do Machine Learning Techniques and Dynamic Methods Help Forecast US Natural Gas Crises?
title_sort do machine learning techniques and dynamic methods help forecast us natural gas crises?
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Our study combines machine learning techniques and dynamic moving window and expanding window methods to predict crises in the US natural gas market. Specifically, as machine learning models, we employ extreme gradient boosting (XGboost), support vector machines (SVMs), a logistic regression (LogR), random forests (RFs), and neural networks (NNs). The data set used to develop the model covers the period 1994 to 2019 and contains 121 explanatory variables, including those related to crude oil, stock markets, US bond and gold futures, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) index, and agriculture futures. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to combine machine learning techniques with dynamic approaches to predict US natural gas crises. To improve the model’s prediction accuracy, we applied a suite of parameter-tuning methods (e.g., grid-search) to select the best-performing hyperparameters for each model. Our empirical results demonstrated very good prediction accuracy for US natural gas crises when combining the XGboost model with the dynamic moving window method. We believe our findings will be useful to investors wanting to diversify their portfolios, as well as to policymakers wanting to take preemptive action to reduce losses.
topic dynamic approaches
forecasting
logistic regression
random forests
support vector machines
US natural gas crises
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2371
work_keys_str_mv AT wentingzhang domachinelearningtechniquesanddynamicmethodshelpforecastusnaturalgascrises
AT shigeyukihamori domachinelearningtechniquesanddynamicmethodshelpforecastusnaturalgascrises
_version_ 1724707836089335808