The generation of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise in bacteria.

Noise in the expression of a gene produces fluctuations in the concentration of the gene product. These fluctuations can interfere with optimal function or can be exploited to generate beneficial diversity between cells; gene expression noise is therefore expected to be subject to evolutionary press...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Namiko Mitarai, Ian B Dodd, Michael T Crooks, Kim Sneppen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2008-07-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2442219?pdf=render
id doaj-761c6cde01e74e7b8ae5965a55a84f3e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-761c6cde01e74e7b8ae5965a55a84f3e2020-11-24T21:50:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582008-07-0147e100010910.1371/journal.pcbi.1000109The generation of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise in bacteria.Namiko MitaraiIan B DoddMichael T CrooksKim SneppenNoise in the expression of a gene produces fluctuations in the concentration of the gene product. These fluctuations can interfere with optimal function or can be exploited to generate beneficial diversity between cells; gene expression noise is therefore expected to be subject to evolutionary pressure. Shifts between modes of high and low rates of transcription initiation at a promoter appear to contribute to this noise both in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. However, models invoked for eukaryotic promoter noise such as stable activation scaffolds or persistent nucleosome alterations seem unlikely to apply to prokaryotic promoters. We consider the relative importance of the steps required for transcription initiation. The 3-step transcription initiation model of McClure is extended into a mathematical model that can be used to predict consequences of additional promoter properties. We show in principle that the transcriptional bursting observed at an E. coli promoter by Golding et al. (2005) can be explained by stimulation of initiation by the negative supercoiling behind a transcribing RNA polymerase (RNAP) or by the formation of moribund or dead-end RNAP-promoter complexes. Both mechanisms are tunable by the alteration of promoter kinetics and therefore allow the optimization of promoter mediated noise.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2442219?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Namiko Mitarai
Ian B Dodd
Michael T Crooks
Kim Sneppen
spellingShingle Namiko Mitarai
Ian B Dodd
Michael T Crooks
Kim Sneppen
The generation of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise in bacteria.
PLoS Computational Biology
author_facet Namiko Mitarai
Ian B Dodd
Michael T Crooks
Kim Sneppen
author_sort Namiko Mitarai
title The generation of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise in bacteria.
title_short The generation of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise in bacteria.
title_full The generation of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise in bacteria.
title_fullStr The generation of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise in bacteria.
title_full_unstemmed The generation of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise in bacteria.
title_sort generation of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise in bacteria.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2008-07-01
description Noise in the expression of a gene produces fluctuations in the concentration of the gene product. These fluctuations can interfere with optimal function or can be exploited to generate beneficial diversity between cells; gene expression noise is therefore expected to be subject to evolutionary pressure. Shifts between modes of high and low rates of transcription initiation at a promoter appear to contribute to this noise both in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. However, models invoked for eukaryotic promoter noise such as stable activation scaffolds or persistent nucleosome alterations seem unlikely to apply to prokaryotic promoters. We consider the relative importance of the steps required for transcription initiation. The 3-step transcription initiation model of McClure is extended into a mathematical model that can be used to predict consequences of additional promoter properties. We show in principle that the transcriptional bursting observed at an E. coli promoter by Golding et al. (2005) can be explained by stimulation of initiation by the negative supercoiling behind a transcribing RNA polymerase (RNAP) or by the formation of moribund or dead-end RNAP-promoter complexes. Both mechanisms are tunable by the alteration of promoter kinetics and therefore allow the optimization of promoter mediated noise.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2442219?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT namikomitarai thegenerationofpromotermediatedtranscriptionalnoiseinbacteria
AT ianbdodd thegenerationofpromotermediatedtranscriptionalnoiseinbacteria
AT michaeltcrooks thegenerationofpromotermediatedtranscriptionalnoiseinbacteria
AT kimsneppen thegenerationofpromotermediatedtranscriptionalnoiseinbacteria
AT namikomitarai generationofpromotermediatedtranscriptionalnoiseinbacteria
AT ianbdodd generationofpromotermediatedtranscriptionalnoiseinbacteria
AT michaeltcrooks generationofpromotermediatedtranscriptionalnoiseinbacteria
AT kimsneppen generationofpromotermediatedtranscriptionalnoiseinbacteria
_version_ 1725881888711639040