A POLÍTICA DE COHESIÓN EUROPEA. EVOLUCIÓN E PERSPECTIVAS
The evolution of what was the common market up to the European Union can be stu-died from different points of view. In this work we have taken the economic integration and, es-pecially, economic, social and territorial cohesion as key to understanding a process that, despi-te the current crisis has...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Revista Galega de Economía |
Online Access: | http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=39124534007 |
id |
doaj-761480211ebb4ace80b67f0ff92a1745 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-761480211ebb4ace80b67f0ff92a17452020-11-25T01:41:00ZengUniversidade de Santiago de CompostelaRevista Galega de Economía1132-27992012-01-0121135163A POLÍTICA DE COHESIÓN EUROPEA. EVOLUCIÓN E PERSPECTIVASLAUREANO LÁZARO ARAUJOThe evolution of what was the common market up to the European Union can be stu-died from different points of view. In this work we have taken the economic integration and, es-pecially, economic, social and territorial cohesion as key to understanding a process that, despi-te the current crisis has attracted the attention of professional politicians and scholars. There are four stages. The first, from its origins to the Single European Act (SEA 1987). The second, from the SEA to the Treaty of Amsterdam (TA 1999). The third, from the TA to the great expansion (2004-2007). The fourth, in which we find is an open area. The thesis is maintained that, after the great gallop which represented the SEA and the Delors presidency, the unification of Ger-many and the collapse of the USSR marked a turning point downwards, whose documentary and financial Reflection is the Agenda 2000. Economic integration is the subject of several at-tempts to relaunch (Lisbon Strategy, Europe 2020, the Single Market Act), unable to tie up loose ends. On cohesion, since the reform of structural funds, not as now, when most needed, has been so weak the financial and real economic strengthening cohesion. Only in the official litera-ture on the rise. They are views not without controversy. Nevertheless, despite the crisis, despite the lack of leadership and excessive arrogance, worth pursuing in efforts to further progress to-wards political union.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=39124534007 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
LAUREANO LÁZARO ARAUJO |
spellingShingle |
LAUREANO LÁZARO ARAUJO A POLÍTICA DE COHESIÓN EUROPEA. EVOLUCIÓN E PERSPECTIVAS Revista Galega de Economía |
author_facet |
LAUREANO LÁZARO ARAUJO |
author_sort |
LAUREANO LÁZARO ARAUJO |
title |
A POLÍTICA DE COHESIÓN EUROPEA. EVOLUCIÓN E PERSPECTIVAS |
title_short |
A POLÍTICA DE COHESIÓN EUROPEA. EVOLUCIÓN E PERSPECTIVAS |
title_full |
A POLÍTICA DE COHESIÓN EUROPEA. EVOLUCIÓN E PERSPECTIVAS |
title_fullStr |
A POLÍTICA DE COHESIÓN EUROPEA. EVOLUCIÓN E PERSPECTIVAS |
title_full_unstemmed |
A POLÍTICA DE COHESIÓN EUROPEA. EVOLUCIÓN E PERSPECTIVAS |
title_sort |
política de cohesión europea. evolución e perspectivas |
publisher |
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela |
series |
Revista Galega de Economía |
issn |
1132-2799 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
The evolution of what was the common market up to the European Union can be stu-died from different points of view. In this work we have taken the economic integration and, es-pecially, economic, social and territorial cohesion as key to understanding a process that, despi-te the current crisis has attracted the attention of professional politicians and scholars. There are four stages. The first, from its origins to the Single European Act (SEA 1987). The second, from the SEA to the Treaty of Amsterdam (TA 1999). The third, from the TA to the great expansion (2004-2007). The fourth, in which we find is an open area. The thesis is maintained that, after the great gallop which represented the SEA and the Delors presidency, the unification of Ger-many and the collapse of the USSR marked a turning point downwards, whose documentary and financial Reflection is the Agenda 2000. Economic integration is the subject of several at-tempts to relaunch (Lisbon Strategy, Europe 2020, the Single Market Act), unable to tie up loose ends. On cohesion, since the reform of structural funds, not as now, when most needed, has been so weak the financial and real economic strengthening cohesion. Only in the official litera-ture on the rise. They are views not without controversy. Nevertheless, despite the crisis, despite the lack of leadership and excessive arrogance, worth pursuing in efforts to further progress to-wards political union. |
url |
http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=39124534007 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT laureanolazaroaraujo apoliticadecohesioneuropeaevolucioneperspectivas AT laureanolazaroaraujo politicadecohesioneuropeaevolucioneperspectivas |
_version_ |
1725043077158010880 |