Equity or Dworkin’s Egalitarianism

Principles that Incorporate Policies Versus Principles that Stand on Their Own Ronald Dworkin contended that the process of judicial interpretation in the United States and the United Kingdom is and should be regulated by egalitarian principles that are partially constitutive of the law. In c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mark Gould
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Ancilla Iuris 2016-08-01
Series:Ancilla Iuris
Online Access:https://anci.ch/articles/ancilla2016_61_gould.pdf
id doaj-76127e6d6b8e418da5f443d6e0cbb1a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76127e6d6b8e418da5f443d6e0cbb1a82020-11-24T22:21:30ZdeuAncilla IurisAncilla Iuris1661-86101661-86102016-08-016185Equity or Dworkin’s EgalitarianismMark Gould Principles that Incorporate Policies Versus Principles that Stand on Their Own Ronald Dworkin contended that the process of judicial interpretation in the United States and the United Kingdom is and should be regulated by egalitarian principles that are partially constitutive of the law. In contrast, I develop the rudiments of a theory of judicial activity that maintains the autonomy of principles, while recognizing that their very meaning is dependent on the consequences of their implementation. To make my argument manageable within the context of this paper, I contrast Dworkin’s notion of equality, which is essentially procedural, with an image of equity that merges formal and substantive claims, recognizes that the implementation of egalitarian norms may accentuate inequality, and mandates actions to enhance substantively egalitarian outcomes.https://anci.ch/articles/ancilla2016_61_gould.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark Gould
spellingShingle Mark Gould
Equity or Dworkin’s Egalitarianism
Ancilla Iuris
author_facet Mark Gould
author_sort Mark Gould
title Equity or Dworkin’s Egalitarianism
title_short Equity or Dworkin’s Egalitarianism
title_full Equity or Dworkin’s Egalitarianism
title_fullStr Equity or Dworkin’s Egalitarianism
title_full_unstemmed Equity or Dworkin’s Egalitarianism
title_sort equity or dworkin’s egalitarianism
publisher Ancilla Iuris
series Ancilla Iuris
issn 1661-8610
1661-8610
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Principles that Incorporate Policies Versus Principles that Stand on Their Own Ronald Dworkin contended that the process of judicial interpretation in the United States and the United Kingdom is and should be regulated by egalitarian principles that are partially constitutive of the law. In contrast, I develop the rudiments of a theory of judicial activity that maintains the autonomy of principles, while recognizing that their very meaning is dependent on the consequences of their implementation. To make my argument manageable within the context of this paper, I contrast Dworkin’s notion of equality, which is essentially procedural, with an image of equity that merges formal and substantive claims, recognizes that the implementation of egalitarian norms may accentuate inequality, and mandates actions to enhance substantively egalitarian outcomes.
url https://anci.ch/articles/ancilla2016_61_gould.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT markgould equityordworkinsegalitarianism
_version_ 1725770878226006016