Comparing CFSR and conventional weather data for discharge and soil loss modelling with SWAT in small catchments in the Ethiopian Highlands
Accurate rainfall data are the key input parameter for modelling river discharge and soil loss. Remote areas of Ethiopia often lack adequate precipitation data and where these data are available, there might be substantial temporal or spatial gaps. To counter this challenge, the Climate Forecast Sys...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2016-03-01
|
Series: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
Online Access: | http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/20/921/2016/hess-20-921-2016.pdf |
Summary: | Accurate rainfall data are the key input parameter for modelling river
discharge and soil loss. Remote areas of Ethiopia often lack adequate
precipitation data and where these data are available, there might be
substantial temporal or spatial gaps. To counter this challenge, the Climate
Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) of the National Centers for Environmental
Prediction (NCEP) readily provides weather data for any geographic location
on earth between 1979 and 2014. This study assesses the applicability of CFSR
weather data to three watersheds in the Blue Nile Basin in Ethiopia. To this
end, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was set up to simulate
discharge and soil loss, using CFSR and conventional weather data, in three
small-scale watersheds ranging from 112 to 477 ha. Calibrated simulation
results were compared to observed river discharge and observed soil loss over
a period of 32 years. The conventional weather data resulted in very good
discharge outputs for all three watersheds, while the CFSR weather data
resulted in unsatisfactory discharge outputs for all of the three gauging
stations. Soil loss simulation with conventional weather inputs yielded
satisfactory outputs for two of three watersheds, while the CFSR weather
input resulted in three unsatisfactory results. Overall, the simulations with
the conventional data resulted in far better results for discharge and soil
loss than simulations with CFSR data. The simulations with CFSR data were
unable to adequately represent the specific regional climate for the three
watersheds, performing even worse in climatic areas with two rainy seasons.
Hence, CFSR data should not be used lightly in remote areas with no
conventional weather data where no prior analysis is possible. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1027-5606 1607-7938 |