Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Klemen Jane, Vollstädt-Klein Sabine, Bühler Mira, Smolka Michael N
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-07-01
Series:Behavioral and Brain Functions
Online Access:http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/30
id doaj-75cc1c5a8f2e411899ef20256dc1e62e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-75cc1c5a8f2e411899ef20256dc1e62e2020-11-25T00:26:35ZengBMCBehavioral and Brain Functions1744-90812008-07-01413010.1186/1744-9081-4-30Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designsKlemen JaneVollstädt-Klein SabineBühler MiraSmolka Michael N<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects stimulus-induced brain activity, we compared brief event-related presentation of erotic vs. neutral stimuli with blocked presentation in 10 male volunteers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Brain activation differed depending on design type in only 10% of the voxels showing task related brain activity. Differences between blocked and event-related stimulus presentation were found in occipitotemporal and temporal regions (Brodmann Area (BA) 19, 37, 48), parietal areas (BA 7, 40) and areas in the frontal lobe (BA 6, 44).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results suggest that event-related designs might be a potential alternative when the core interest is the detection of networks associated with immediate processing of erotic stimuli.</p> <p>Additionally, blocked, compared to event-related, stimulus presentation allows the emergence and detection of non-specific secondary processes, such as sustained attention, motor imagery and inhibition of sexual arousal.</p> http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/30
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Klemen Jane
Vollstädt-Klein Sabine
Bühler Mira
Smolka Michael N
spellingShingle Klemen Jane
Vollstädt-Klein Sabine
Bühler Mira
Smolka Michael N
Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
Behavioral and Brain Functions
author_facet Klemen Jane
Vollstädt-Klein Sabine
Bühler Mira
Smolka Michael N
author_sort Klemen Jane
title Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title_short Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title_full Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title_fullStr Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title_full_unstemmed Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
title_sort does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? event-related vs. blocked fmri designs
publisher BMC
series Behavioral and Brain Functions
issn 1744-9081
publishDate 2008-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects stimulus-induced brain activity, we compared brief event-related presentation of erotic vs. neutral stimuli with blocked presentation in 10 male volunteers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Brain activation differed depending on design type in only 10% of the voxels showing task related brain activity. Differences between blocked and event-related stimulus presentation were found in occipitotemporal and temporal regions (Brodmann Area (BA) 19, 37, 48), parietal areas (BA 7, 40) and areas in the frontal lobe (BA 6, 44).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results suggest that event-related designs might be a potential alternative when the core interest is the detection of networks associated with immediate processing of erotic stimuli.</p> <p>Additionally, blocked, compared to event-related, stimulus presentation allows the emergence and detection of non-specific secondary processes, such as sustained attention, motor imagery and inhibition of sexual arousal.</p>
url http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/30
work_keys_str_mv AT klemenjane doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns
AT vollstadtkleinsabine doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns
AT buhlermira doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns
AT smolkamichaeln doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns
_version_ 1725343952067887104