Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2008-07-01
|
Series: | Behavioral and Brain Functions |
Online Access: | http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/30 |
id |
doaj-75cc1c5a8f2e411899ef20256dc1e62e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-75cc1c5a8f2e411899ef20256dc1e62e2020-11-25T00:26:35ZengBMCBehavioral and Brain Functions1744-90812008-07-01413010.1186/1744-9081-4-30Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designsKlemen JaneVollstädt-Klein SabineBühler MiraSmolka Michael N<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects stimulus-induced brain activity, we compared brief event-related presentation of erotic vs. neutral stimuli with blocked presentation in 10 male volunteers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Brain activation differed depending on design type in only 10% of the voxels showing task related brain activity. Differences between blocked and event-related stimulus presentation were found in occipitotemporal and temporal regions (Brodmann Area (BA) 19, 37, 48), parietal areas (BA 7, 40) and areas in the frontal lobe (BA 6, 44).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results suggest that event-related designs might be a potential alternative when the core interest is the detection of networks associated with immediate processing of erotic stimuli.</p> <p>Additionally, blocked, compared to event-related, stimulus presentation allows the emergence and detection of non-specific secondary processes, such as sustained attention, motor imagery and inhibition of sexual arousal.</p> http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/30 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Klemen Jane Vollstädt-Klein Sabine Bühler Mira Smolka Michael N |
spellingShingle |
Klemen Jane Vollstädt-Klein Sabine Bühler Mira Smolka Michael N Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs Behavioral and Brain Functions |
author_facet |
Klemen Jane Vollstädt-Klein Sabine Bühler Mira Smolka Michael N |
author_sort |
Klemen Jane |
title |
Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title_short |
Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title_full |
Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title_fullStr |
Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? Event-related vs. blocked fMRI designs |
title_sort |
does erotic stimulus presentation design affect brain activation patterns? event-related vs. blocked fmri designs |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Behavioral and Brain Functions |
issn |
1744-9081 |
publishDate |
2008-07-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Existing brain imaging studies, investigating sexual arousal via the presentation of erotic pictures or film excerpts, have mainly used blocked designs with long stimulus presentation times.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>To clarify how experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design affects stimulus-induced brain activity, we compared brief event-related presentation of erotic vs. neutral stimuli with blocked presentation in 10 male volunteers.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Brain activation differed depending on design type in only 10% of the voxels showing task related brain activity. Differences between blocked and event-related stimulus presentation were found in occipitotemporal and temporal regions (Brodmann Area (BA) 19, 37, 48), parietal areas (BA 7, 40) and areas in the frontal lobe (BA 6, 44).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our results suggest that event-related designs might be a potential alternative when the core interest is the detection of networks associated with immediate processing of erotic stimuli.</p> <p>Additionally, blocked, compared to event-related, stimulus presentation allows the emergence and detection of non-specific secondary processes, such as sustained attention, motor imagery and inhibition of sexual arousal.</p> |
url |
http://www.behavioralandbrainfunctions.com/content/4/1/30 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT klemenjane doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns AT vollstadtkleinsabine doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns AT buhlermira doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns AT smolkamichaeln doeseroticstimuluspresentationdesignaffectbrainactivationpatternseventrelatedvsblockedfmridesigns |
_version_ |
1725343952067887104 |