Diet of two large sympatric teleosts, the ling (Genypterus blacodes) and hake (Merluccius australis).

Ling and hake are tertiary consumers, and as a result both may have an important structuring role in marine communities. The diets of 2064 ling and 913 hake from Chatham Rise, New Zealand, were determined from examination of stomach contents. Ling was a benthic generalist, and hake a demersal pisciv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew R Dunn, Amelia M Connell, Jeff Forman, Darren W Stevens, Peter L Horn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-10-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2965093?pdf=render
id doaj-75bce70bf25e4958a81be14bccabc962
record_format Article
spelling doaj-75bce70bf25e4958a81be14bccabc9622020-11-25T02:29:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-10-01510e1364710.1371/journal.pone.0013647Diet of two large sympatric teleosts, the ling (Genypterus blacodes) and hake (Merluccius australis).Matthew R DunnAmelia M ConnellJeff FormanDarren W StevensPeter L HornLing and hake are tertiary consumers, and as a result both may have an important structuring role in marine communities. The diets of 2064 ling and 913 hake from Chatham Rise, New Zealand, were determined from examination of stomach contents. Ling was a benthic generalist, and hake a demersal piscivore. The diet of ling was characterised by benthic crustaceans, mainly Munida gracilis and Metanephrops challengeri, and demersal fishes, mainly Macrourids and scavenged offal from fishing vessels. The diet of hake was characterised by teleost fishes, mainly macrourids and merlucciids. Multivariate analyses using distance-based linear models found the most important predictors of diet variability were depth, fish length, and vessel type (whether the sample was collected from a commercial or research vessel) for ling, and fish length and vessel type for hake. There was no interspecific predation between ling and hake, and resource competition was largely restricted to macrourid prey, although the dominant macrourid species predated by ling and hake were different. Cluster analysis of average diet of intraspecific groups of ling and hake confirmed the persistent diet separation. Although size is a central factor in determining ecological processes, similar sized ling and hake had distinctly different foraging ecology, and therefore could influence the ecosystem in different ways, and be unequally affected by ecosystem fluctuations.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2965093?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew R Dunn
Amelia M Connell
Jeff Forman
Darren W Stevens
Peter L Horn
spellingShingle Matthew R Dunn
Amelia M Connell
Jeff Forman
Darren W Stevens
Peter L Horn
Diet of two large sympatric teleosts, the ling (Genypterus blacodes) and hake (Merluccius australis).
PLoS ONE
author_facet Matthew R Dunn
Amelia M Connell
Jeff Forman
Darren W Stevens
Peter L Horn
author_sort Matthew R Dunn
title Diet of two large sympatric teleosts, the ling (Genypterus blacodes) and hake (Merluccius australis).
title_short Diet of two large sympatric teleosts, the ling (Genypterus blacodes) and hake (Merluccius australis).
title_full Diet of two large sympatric teleosts, the ling (Genypterus blacodes) and hake (Merluccius australis).
title_fullStr Diet of two large sympatric teleosts, the ling (Genypterus blacodes) and hake (Merluccius australis).
title_full_unstemmed Diet of two large sympatric teleosts, the ling (Genypterus blacodes) and hake (Merluccius australis).
title_sort diet of two large sympatric teleosts, the ling (genypterus blacodes) and hake (merluccius australis).
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-10-01
description Ling and hake are tertiary consumers, and as a result both may have an important structuring role in marine communities. The diets of 2064 ling and 913 hake from Chatham Rise, New Zealand, were determined from examination of stomach contents. Ling was a benthic generalist, and hake a demersal piscivore. The diet of ling was characterised by benthic crustaceans, mainly Munida gracilis and Metanephrops challengeri, and demersal fishes, mainly Macrourids and scavenged offal from fishing vessels. The diet of hake was characterised by teleost fishes, mainly macrourids and merlucciids. Multivariate analyses using distance-based linear models found the most important predictors of diet variability were depth, fish length, and vessel type (whether the sample was collected from a commercial or research vessel) for ling, and fish length and vessel type for hake. There was no interspecific predation between ling and hake, and resource competition was largely restricted to macrourid prey, although the dominant macrourid species predated by ling and hake were different. Cluster analysis of average diet of intraspecific groups of ling and hake confirmed the persistent diet separation. Although size is a central factor in determining ecological processes, similar sized ling and hake had distinctly different foraging ecology, and therefore could influence the ecosystem in different ways, and be unequally affected by ecosystem fluctuations.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2965093?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewrdunn dietoftwolargesympatricteleoststhelinggenypterusblacodesandhakemerlucciusaustralis
AT ameliamconnell dietoftwolargesympatricteleoststhelinggenypterusblacodesandhakemerlucciusaustralis
AT jeffforman dietoftwolargesympatricteleoststhelinggenypterusblacodesandhakemerlucciusaustralis
AT darrenwstevens dietoftwolargesympatricteleoststhelinggenypterusblacodesandhakemerlucciusaustralis
AT peterlhorn dietoftwolargesympatricteleoststhelinggenypterusblacodesandhakemerlucciusaustralis
_version_ 1724834547617497088