Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea.
Despite the fact that scientific and political consideration for ecosystem services has dramatically increased over the past decade, few studies have focused on marine and coastal ecosystem services for conservation strategies. We used an ecosystem services approach to assess spatial distributions o...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4519238?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-75b5b3e2adeb48c5b87392208d0be3ec |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-75b5b3e2adeb48c5b87392208d0be3ec2020-11-24T21:24:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01107e013385610.1371/journal.pone.0133856Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea.Min Gon ChungHojeong KangSung-Uk ChoiDespite the fact that scientific and political consideration for ecosystem services has dramatically increased over the past decade, few studies have focused on marine and coastal ecosystem services for conservation strategies. We used an ecosystem services approach to assess spatial distributions of habitat risks and four ecosystem services (coastal protection, carbon storage, recreation, and aesthetic quality), and explored the tradeoffs among them in coastal areas of South Korea. Additionally, we analyzed how the social and ecological characteristics in coastal areas interact with conservation and development policies by using this approach. We found strong negative associations between the habitat risks and ecosystem services (aquaculture, carbon storage, recreation, and aesthetic quality) across the coastal counties. Our results showed that the intensity of the habitat risks and the provision of ecosystem services were significantly different between reclamation-dominated and conservation-dominated counties, except for coastal vulnerability. A generalized linear model suggested that reclamation projects were dependent on economic efficiency, whereas demographic pressures and habitat conditions influenced the designation of protected areas at a county level. The ecosystem services approach provided guidelines to achieve both sustainable development and environment conservation. By using the approach, we can select the priority areas for developments while we can minimize the degradation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. As cultural ecosystem services are evenly distributed throughout coastal areas of South Korea, decision makers may employ them to improve the conditions of coastal wetlands outside of protected areas.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4519238?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Min Gon Chung Hojeong Kang Sung-Uk Choi |
spellingShingle |
Min Gon Chung Hojeong Kang Sung-Uk Choi Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Min Gon Chung Hojeong Kang Sung-Uk Choi |
author_sort |
Min Gon Chung |
title |
Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea. |
title_short |
Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea. |
title_full |
Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea. |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea. |
title_sort |
assessment of coastal ecosystem services for conservation strategies in south korea. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Despite the fact that scientific and political consideration for ecosystem services has dramatically increased over the past decade, few studies have focused on marine and coastal ecosystem services for conservation strategies. We used an ecosystem services approach to assess spatial distributions of habitat risks and four ecosystem services (coastal protection, carbon storage, recreation, and aesthetic quality), and explored the tradeoffs among them in coastal areas of South Korea. Additionally, we analyzed how the social and ecological characteristics in coastal areas interact with conservation and development policies by using this approach. We found strong negative associations between the habitat risks and ecosystem services (aquaculture, carbon storage, recreation, and aesthetic quality) across the coastal counties. Our results showed that the intensity of the habitat risks and the provision of ecosystem services were significantly different between reclamation-dominated and conservation-dominated counties, except for coastal vulnerability. A generalized linear model suggested that reclamation projects were dependent on economic efficiency, whereas demographic pressures and habitat conditions influenced the designation of protected areas at a county level. The ecosystem services approach provided guidelines to achieve both sustainable development and environment conservation. By using the approach, we can select the priority areas for developments while we can minimize the degradation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. As cultural ecosystem services are evenly distributed throughout coastal areas of South Korea, decision makers may employ them to improve the conditions of coastal wetlands outside of protected areas. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4519238?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mingonchung assessmentofcoastalecosystemservicesforconservationstrategiesinsouthkorea AT hojeongkang assessmentofcoastalecosystemservicesforconservationstrategiesinsouthkorea AT sungukchoi assessmentofcoastalecosystemservicesforconservationstrategiesinsouthkorea |
_version_ |
1725987121572872192 |