Drumul antreprenorial: fără încredere dar cu relații

The focus of the paper is on the role of social capital for the diffusion of entrepreneurship in Romanian rural communities. The analysis is done by using data sets from surveys at national level. Entrepreneurship appears to be a innovative behavior under the influence of human, material and social...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dumitru Sandu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Expert Projects 1999-08-01
Series:Sociologie Românească
Online Access:https://arsociologie.ro/revistasociologieromaneasca/sr/article/view/1326
id doaj-75b203cfb5f544d4bcdb6b380da20fb1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-75b203cfb5f544d4bcdb6b380da20fb12020-11-25T03:35:50ZengExpert ProjectsSociologie Românească1220-53892668-14551999-08-0182Drumul antreprenorial: fără încredere dar cu relațiiDumitru Sandu0Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest The focus of the paper is on the role of social capital for the diffusion of entrepreneurship in Romanian rural communities. The analysis is done by using data sets from surveys at national level. Entrepreneurship appears to be a innovative behavior under the influence of human, material and social capital. The relation with the social capital is a dynamic and differentiated one, function of the stage of entrepreneurship. There are significant differences of human and social capital among behavior, intention and desire entrepreneurs. Accessibility to useful social relations, a key favoring factor of entrepreneurship is significantly conditioned by leadership experience in communist times and by wealth. Rural social capital is clearly structured by four dimensions: diffuse trust and cooperation, trust in institutions, and network capital and integration of formal institutions by their functioning. It is only the working of the first three dimensions that could be revealed by survey data. Considering this limitation, the conclusion is that rural social capital is a working reality, not only an umbrella concept: diffuse trust, trust in institutions and network capital stem all from a unique latent dimension that could be labelled as social capital. Rural social capital is more "fractured" than urban social capital. Interpersonal trust in rural communities is negatively related to the intensity and scope of network social capital. https://arsociologie.ro/revistasociologieromaneasca/sr/article/view/1326
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dumitru Sandu
spellingShingle Dumitru Sandu
Drumul antreprenorial: fără încredere dar cu relații
Sociologie Românească
author_facet Dumitru Sandu
author_sort Dumitru Sandu
title Drumul antreprenorial: fără încredere dar cu relații
title_short Drumul antreprenorial: fără încredere dar cu relații
title_full Drumul antreprenorial: fără încredere dar cu relații
title_fullStr Drumul antreprenorial: fără încredere dar cu relații
title_full_unstemmed Drumul antreprenorial: fără încredere dar cu relații
title_sort drumul antreprenorial: fără încredere dar cu relații
publisher Expert Projects
series Sociologie Românească
issn 1220-5389
2668-1455
publishDate 1999-08-01
description The focus of the paper is on the role of social capital for the diffusion of entrepreneurship in Romanian rural communities. The analysis is done by using data sets from surveys at national level. Entrepreneurship appears to be a innovative behavior under the influence of human, material and social capital. The relation with the social capital is a dynamic and differentiated one, function of the stage of entrepreneurship. There are significant differences of human and social capital among behavior, intention and desire entrepreneurs. Accessibility to useful social relations, a key favoring factor of entrepreneurship is significantly conditioned by leadership experience in communist times and by wealth. Rural social capital is clearly structured by four dimensions: diffuse trust and cooperation, trust in institutions, and network capital and integration of formal institutions by their functioning. It is only the working of the first three dimensions that could be revealed by survey data. Considering this limitation, the conclusion is that rural social capital is a working reality, not only an umbrella concept: diffuse trust, trust in institutions and network capital stem all from a unique latent dimension that could be labelled as social capital. Rural social capital is more "fractured" than urban social capital. Interpersonal trust in rural communities is negatively related to the intensity and scope of network social capital.
url https://arsociologie.ro/revistasociologieromaneasca/sr/article/view/1326
work_keys_str_mv AT dumitrusandu drumulantreprenorialfaraincrederedarcurelatii
_version_ 1724552865518714880