Complaints handling in hospitals: an empirical study of discrepancies between patients' expectations and their experiences

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many patients are dissatisfied with the way in which their complaints about health care are dealt with. This study tested the assumption that this dissatisfaction consists – in part at least – of unmet expectations.</p> <p&g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sluijs Emmy M, Friele Roland D, Legemaate Johan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-09-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/199
id doaj-7557bf20bd614a8caac2d5d153966b1b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7557bf20bd614a8caac2d5d153966b1b2020-11-25T02:21:55ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632008-09-018119910.1186/1472-6963-8-199Complaints handling in hospitals: an empirical study of discrepancies between patients' expectations and their experiencesSluijs Emmy MFriele Roland DLegemaate Johan<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many patients are dissatisfied with the way in which their complaints about health care are dealt with. This study tested the assumption that this dissatisfaction consists – in part at least – of unmet expectations.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Subjects were 279 patients who lodged a complaint with the complaints committees of 74 hospitals in the Netherlands. They completed two questionnaires; one on their expectations at the start of the complaints handling process, and one on their experiences after the complaints procedure (pre-post design; response 50%). Dependent variables are patients' satisfaction and their feeling that justice was done; independent variables are the association between patients' expectations and their experiences.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Only 31% of the patients felt they had received justice from the complaints process.</p> <p>Two thirds of the patients were satisfied with the conduct of the complaints committee, but fewer were satisfied with the conduct of the hospital or the medical professional (29% and 18%). Large discrepancies between expectations and experiences were found in the case of doctors not admitting errors when errors had been made, and of hospital managements not providing information on corrective measures that were taken. Discrepancies collectively explained 51% of patients' dissatisfaction with the committee and one third of patients' dissatisfaction with the hospital and the professional. The feeling that justice was done was influenced by the decision on the complaint (well-founded or not), but also by the satisfaction with the conduct of the committee, the hospital management and the professional involved.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is disappointing to observe that less than one third of the patients felt that justice had been done through the complaints handling process. This study shows that the feeling that justice had been done is not only influenced by the judgement of the complaints committee, but also by the response of the professional. Furthermore, hospitals and professionals should communicate on how they are going to prevent a recurrence of the events that led to the complaint.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/199
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sluijs Emmy M
Friele Roland D
Legemaate Johan
spellingShingle Sluijs Emmy M
Friele Roland D
Legemaate Johan
Complaints handling in hospitals: an empirical study of discrepancies between patients' expectations and their experiences
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Sluijs Emmy M
Friele Roland D
Legemaate Johan
author_sort Sluijs Emmy M
title Complaints handling in hospitals: an empirical study of discrepancies between patients' expectations and their experiences
title_short Complaints handling in hospitals: an empirical study of discrepancies between patients' expectations and their experiences
title_full Complaints handling in hospitals: an empirical study of discrepancies between patients' expectations and their experiences
title_fullStr Complaints handling in hospitals: an empirical study of discrepancies between patients' expectations and their experiences
title_full_unstemmed Complaints handling in hospitals: an empirical study of discrepancies between patients' expectations and their experiences
title_sort complaints handling in hospitals: an empirical study of discrepancies between patients' expectations and their experiences
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2008-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Many patients are dissatisfied with the way in which their complaints about health care are dealt with. This study tested the assumption that this dissatisfaction consists – in part at least – of unmet expectations.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Subjects were 279 patients who lodged a complaint with the complaints committees of 74 hospitals in the Netherlands. They completed two questionnaires; one on their expectations at the start of the complaints handling process, and one on their experiences after the complaints procedure (pre-post design; response 50%). Dependent variables are patients' satisfaction and their feeling that justice was done; independent variables are the association between patients' expectations and their experiences.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Only 31% of the patients felt they had received justice from the complaints process.</p> <p>Two thirds of the patients were satisfied with the conduct of the complaints committee, but fewer were satisfied with the conduct of the hospital or the medical professional (29% and 18%). Large discrepancies between expectations and experiences were found in the case of doctors not admitting errors when errors had been made, and of hospital managements not providing information on corrective measures that were taken. Discrepancies collectively explained 51% of patients' dissatisfaction with the committee and one third of patients' dissatisfaction with the hospital and the professional. The feeling that justice was done was influenced by the decision on the complaint (well-founded or not), but also by the satisfaction with the conduct of the committee, the hospital management and the professional involved.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is disappointing to observe that less than one third of the patients felt that justice had been done through the complaints handling process. This study shows that the feeling that justice had been done is not only influenced by the judgement of the complaints committee, but also by the response of the professional. Furthermore, hospitals and professionals should communicate on how they are going to prevent a recurrence of the events that led to the complaint.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/199
work_keys_str_mv AT sluijsemmym complaintshandlinginhospitalsanempiricalstudyofdiscrepanciesbetweenpatientsexpectationsandtheirexperiences
AT frielerolandd complaintshandlinginhospitalsanempiricalstudyofdiscrepanciesbetweenpatientsexpectationsandtheirexperiences
AT legemaatejohan complaintshandlinginhospitalsanempiricalstudyofdiscrepanciesbetweenpatientsexpectationsandtheirexperiences
_version_ 1724864591228305408