L’asocialité des sciences sociales expertes

This paper offers a critical reflection on the distant, expert position taken on by social scientists influenced by positivism. On behalf of neutrality and objectivity, a dichotomy is constructed between the scientist and its object. This dichotomy is questioned and contrasted with the principles of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Christophe Adam
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: ENS Éditions 2009-11-01
Series:Tracés
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/traces/4389
id doaj-75579b0fa871446984f9aeeb1b0d7f29
record_format Article
spelling doaj-75579b0fa871446984f9aeeb1b0d7f292020-11-25T02:25:27ZfraENS ÉditionsTracés1763-00611963-18122009-11-0111112110.4000/traces.4389L’asocialité des sciences sociales expertesChristophe AdamThis paper offers a critical reflection on the distant, expert position taken on by social scientists influenced by positivism. On behalf of neutrality and objectivity, a dichotomy is constructed between the scientist and its object. This dichotomy is questioned and contrasted with the principles of clinical research, where the knowing subject and the object of knowledge interfere. Using a paradigmatic work in the field of sociology of prisons as a testimony to the disintegration of this dichotomy, we bring to light the fact that the social scientist withdraws subjectively from the social relationship under study, while asserting that his subjectivity must be taken into account in order to grasp the construction of the object. This “absence” is contrasted with one of the rare works from the clinical tradition to have completed the project of subjective involvement of the knowing subject, making subjectivity a constant presence in the relationship under study.http://journals.openedition.org/traces/4389clinicalexpertiseneutralityobjectivitypositivism
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christophe Adam
spellingShingle Christophe Adam
L’asocialité des sciences sociales expertes
Tracés
clinical
expertise
neutrality
objectivity
positivism
author_facet Christophe Adam
author_sort Christophe Adam
title L’asocialité des sciences sociales expertes
title_short L’asocialité des sciences sociales expertes
title_full L’asocialité des sciences sociales expertes
title_fullStr L’asocialité des sciences sociales expertes
title_full_unstemmed L’asocialité des sciences sociales expertes
title_sort l’asocialité des sciences sociales expertes
publisher ENS Éditions
series Tracés
issn 1763-0061
1963-1812
publishDate 2009-11-01
description This paper offers a critical reflection on the distant, expert position taken on by social scientists influenced by positivism. On behalf of neutrality and objectivity, a dichotomy is constructed between the scientist and its object. This dichotomy is questioned and contrasted with the principles of clinical research, where the knowing subject and the object of knowledge interfere. Using a paradigmatic work in the field of sociology of prisons as a testimony to the disintegration of this dichotomy, we bring to light the fact that the social scientist withdraws subjectively from the social relationship under study, while asserting that his subjectivity must be taken into account in order to grasp the construction of the object. This “absence” is contrasted with one of the rare works from the clinical tradition to have completed the project of subjective involvement of the knowing subject, making subjectivity a constant presence in the relationship under study.
topic clinical
expertise
neutrality
objectivity
positivism
url http://journals.openedition.org/traces/4389
work_keys_str_mv AT christopheadam lasocialitedessciencessocialesexpertes
_version_ 1724851214098628608