Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications

<div><p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> Transulnar approach was introduced as an alternative procedure for transradial coronary angiography (CAG) due to its safety and feasibility. The present study was accomplished with the aim to compare major and minor complications of these...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Farshad Roghani-Dehkordi, Rooholah Mansouri, Alireza Khosravi, Behzad Mahaki, Mehdi Akbarzadeh, Mohammad Kermani-Alghoraishi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vesnu Publications 2018-06-01
Series:ARYA Atherosclerosis
Subjects:
Online Access:http://arya.mui.ac.ir/index.php/arya/article/view/1586
id doaj-7545be28ffc94180b106d0bd731daddc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7545be28ffc94180b106d0bd731daddc2020-11-25T00:44:51ZengVesnu PublicationsARYA Atherosclerosis1735-39552251-66382018-06-0114312813110.22122/arya.v14i3.1586696Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complicationsFarshad Roghani-Dehkordi0Rooholah Mansouri1Alireza Khosravi2Behzad Mahaki3Mehdi Akbarzadeh4Mohammad Kermani-Alghoraishi5Associate Professor, Interventional Cardiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranIntervention Fellowship Practitioner, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssociate Professor, Hypertension Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssociate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IranIntervention Fellowship Practitioner, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssistant Professor, Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran<div><p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> Transulnar approach was introduced as an alternative procedure for transradial coronary angiography (CAG) due to its safety and feasibility. The present study was accomplished with the aim to compare major and minor complications of these two upper extremity approaches in the population under study.</p><p><strong>METHODS:</strong> In this prospective observational study, 216 patients who underwent CAG and/or angioplasty via radial (111 cases) or ulnar artery (105 cases) were observed and followed for 6 months and were evaluated for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), minor and major neurovascular events (access related) of the arm including paresthesia/pain, pseudoaneurysm, artery spasm, arterial occlusion, large hematoma, and necessity for amputation or emergency surgery.</p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong><strong> </strong>The majority of patients were men (62.1%) with a mean age of 59.98 ± 9.74 years old. No MACEs and major life threatening vascular complication like large hematoma, need for amputation or surgery, and hand ischemia were occurred. There was no significant difference in minor complications, except for arterial occlusion 9.0 % vs 1.0 % and artery spasm 12.6 % vs <br /> 1.9 % in transradial and transulnar approaches, respectively (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> This study suggested that both transradial and transulnar approaches were safe and feasible for CAG and/or angioplasty. However, regarding minor complications, arterial spasm and occlusion were significantly more common in transradial approach.</p><p> </p></div>http://arya.mui.ac.ir/index.php/arya/article/view/1586Radial ArteryUlnar ArteryCoronary AngiographyComplication
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Farshad Roghani-Dehkordi
Rooholah Mansouri
Alireza Khosravi
Behzad Mahaki
Mehdi Akbarzadeh
Mohammad Kermani-Alghoraishi
spellingShingle Farshad Roghani-Dehkordi
Rooholah Mansouri
Alireza Khosravi
Behzad Mahaki
Mehdi Akbarzadeh
Mohammad Kermani-Alghoraishi
Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications
ARYA Atherosclerosis
Radial Artery
Ulnar Artery
Coronary Angiography
Complication
author_facet Farshad Roghani-Dehkordi
Rooholah Mansouri
Alireza Khosravi
Behzad Mahaki
Mehdi Akbarzadeh
Mohammad Kermani-Alghoraishi
author_sort Farshad Roghani-Dehkordi
title Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications
title_short Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications
title_full Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications
title_fullStr Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications
title_full_unstemmed Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications
title_sort transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: considering their complications
publisher Vesnu Publications
series ARYA Atherosclerosis
issn 1735-3955
2251-6638
publishDate 2018-06-01
description <div><p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> Transulnar approach was introduced as an alternative procedure for transradial coronary angiography (CAG) due to its safety and feasibility. The present study was accomplished with the aim to compare major and minor complications of these two upper extremity approaches in the population under study.</p><p><strong>METHODS:</strong> In this prospective observational study, 216 patients who underwent CAG and/or angioplasty via radial (111 cases) or ulnar artery (105 cases) were observed and followed for 6 months and were evaluated for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), minor and major neurovascular events (access related) of the arm including paresthesia/pain, pseudoaneurysm, artery spasm, arterial occlusion, large hematoma, and necessity for amputation or emergency surgery.</p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong><strong> </strong>The majority of patients were men (62.1%) with a mean age of 59.98 ± 9.74 years old. No MACEs and major life threatening vascular complication like large hematoma, need for amputation or surgery, and hand ischemia were occurred. There was no significant difference in minor complications, except for arterial occlusion 9.0 % vs 1.0 % and artery spasm 12.6 % vs <br /> 1.9 % in transradial and transulnar approaches, respectively (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> This study suggested that both transradial and transulnar approaches were safe and feasible for CAG and/or angioplasty. However, regarding minor complications, arterial spasm and occlusion were significantly more common in transradial approach.</p><p> </p></div>
topic Radial Artery
Ulnar Artery
Coronary Angiography
Complication
url http://arya.mui.ac.ir/index.php/arya/article/view/1586
work_keys_str_mv AT farshadroghanidehkordi transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications
AT rooholahmansouri transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications
AT alirezakhosravi transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications
AT behzadmahaki transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications
AT mehdiakbarzadeh transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications
AT mohammadkermanialghoraishi transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications
_version_ 1725272931247849472