Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications
<div><p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> Transulnar approach was introduced as an alternative procedure for transradial coronary angiography (CAG) due to its safety and feasibility. The present study was accomplished with the aim to compare major and minor complications of these...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vesnu Publications
2018-06-01
|
Series: | ARYA Atherosclerosis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://arya.mui.ac.ir/index.php/arya/article/view/1586 |
id |
doaj-7545be28ffc94180b106d0bd731daddc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7545be28ffc94180b106d0bd731daddc2020-11-25T00:44:51ZengVesnu PublicationsARYA Atherosclerosis1735-39552251-66382018-06-0114312813110.22122/arya.v14i3.1586696Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complicationsFarshad Roghani-Dehkordi0Rooholah Mansouri1Alireza Khosravi2Behzad Mahaki3Mehdi Akbarzadeh4Mohammad Kermani-Alghoraishi5Associate Professor, Interventional Cardiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranIntervention Fellowship Practitioner, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssociate Professor, Hypertension Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssociate Professor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IranIntervention Fellowship Practitioner, Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranAssistant Professor, Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran<div><p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> Transulnar approach was introduced as an alternative procedure for transradial coronary angiography (CAG) due to its safety and feasibility. The present study was accomplished with the aim to compare major and minor complications of these two upper extremity approaches in the population under study.</p><p><strong>METHODS:</strong> In this prospective observational study, 216 patients who underwent CAG and/or angioplasty via radial (111 cases) or ulnar artery (105 cases) were observed and followed for 6 months and were evaluated for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), minor and major neurovascular events (access related) of the arm including paresthesia/pain, pseudoaneurysm, artery spasm, arterial occlusion, large hematoma, and necessity for amputation or emergency surgery.</p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong><strong> </strong>The majority of patients were men (62.1%) with a mean age of 59.98 ± 9.74 years old. No MACEs and major life threatening vascular complication like large hematoma, need for amputation or surgery, and hand ischemia were occurred. There was no significant difference in minor complications, except for arterial occlusion 9.0 % vs 1.0 % and artery spasm 12.6 % vs <br /> 1.9 % in transradial and transulnar approaches, respectively (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> This study suggested that both transradial and transulnar approaches were safe and feasible for CAG and/or angioplasty. However, regarding minor complications, arterial spasm and occlusion were significantly more common in transradial approach.</p><p> </p></div>http://arya.mui.ac.ir/index.php/arya/article/view/1586Radial ArteryUlnar ArteryCoronary AngiographyComplication |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Farshad Roghani-Dehkordi Rooholah Mansouri Alireza Khosravi Behzad Mahaki Mehdi Akbarzadeh Mohammad Kermani-Alghoraishi |
spellingShingle |
Farshad Roghani-Dehkordi Rooholah Mansouri Alireza Khosravi Behzad Mahaki Mehdi Akbarzadeh Mohammad Kermani-Alghoraishi Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications ARYA Atherosclerosis Radial Artery Ulnar Artery Coronary Angiography Complication |
author_facet |
Farshad Roghani-Dehkordi Rooholah Mansouri Alireza Khosravi Behzad Mahaki Mehdi Akbarzadeh Mohammad Kermani-Alghoraishi |
author_sort |
Farshad Roghani-Dehkordi |
title |
Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications |
title_short |
Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications |
title_full |
Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications |
title_fullStr |
Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: Considering their complications |
title_sort |
transulnar versus transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty: considering their complications |
publisher |
Vesnu Publications |
series |
ARYA Atherosclerosis |
issn |
1735-3955 2251-6638 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
<div><p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong> Transulnar approach was introduced as an alternative procedure for transradial coronary angiography (CAG) due to its safety and feasibility. The present study was accomplished with the aim to compare major and minor complications of these two upper extremity approaches in the population under study.</p><p><strong>METHODS:</strong> In this prospective observational study, 216 patients who underwent CAG and/or angioplasty via radial (111 cases) or ulnar artery (105 cases) were observed and followed for 6 months and were evaluated for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), minor and major neurovascular events (access related) of the arm including paresthesia/pain, pseudoaneurysm, artery spasm, arterial occlusion, large hematoma, and necessity for amputation or emergency surgery.</p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong><strong> </strong>The majority of patients were men (62.1%) with a mean age of 59.98 ± 9.74 years old. No MACEs and major life threatening vascular complication like large hematoma, need for amputation or surgery, and hand ischemia were occurred. There was no significant difference in minor complications, except for arterial occlusion 9.0 % vs 1.0 % and artery spasm 12.6 % vs <br /> 1.9 % in transradial and transulnar approaches, respectively (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> This study suggested that both transradial and transulnar approaches were safe and feasible for CAG and/or angioplasty. However, regarding minor complications, arterial spasm and occlusion were significantly more common in transradial approach.</p><p> </p></div> |
topic |
Radial Artery Ulnar Artery Coronary Angiography Complication |
url |
http://arya.mui.ac.ir/index.php/arya/article/view/1586 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT farshadroghanidehkordi transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications AT rooholahmansouri transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications AT alirezakhosravi transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications AT behzadmahaki transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications AT mehdiakbarzadeh transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications AT mohammadkermanialghoraishi transulnarversustransradialapproachforcoronaryangiographyandangioplastyconsideringtheircomplications |
_version_ |
1725272931247849472 |