Comparative analysis of bone fixation in patients with uncomplicated multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations of the forearm

Introduction The functional anatomy of the forearm sets up requirements for the choice of fixation constructs and medical technologies of osteosynthesis to be used for particular localization and pattern of injury. Objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of intramedullary nailing, plating, exte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleksei A. Panov, Balentina A. Kopysova, Andrei N. Svetashov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics 2018-12-01
Series:Гений oртопедии
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ilizarov-journal.com/files/2018_4_01.pdf
id doaj-7544fb24f00b4e219b5e08844ecf104d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7544fb24f00b4e219b5e08844ecf104d2020-11-24T22:52:54ZengRussian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and OrthopaedicsГений oртопедии1028-44272542-131X2018-12-0124442843510.18019/1028-4427-2018-24-4-428-435Comparative analysis of bone fixation in patients with uncomplicated multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations of the forearmAleksei A. Panov0Balentina A. Kopysova1Andrei N. Svetashov2Novokuznetsk State Institute for Further Training of Physicians Branch Campus, Novokuznetsk, Russian FederationAll-Russian Scientific Practical Center of Shape Memory Implants, Novokuznetsk, Russian FederationFederal State Budgetary Institution “413 Military hospital” of the Ministry of Defence of the RF, Volgograd, Russian FederationIntroduction The functional anatomy of the forearm sets up requirements for the choice of fixation constructs and medical technologies of osteosynthesis to be used for particular localization and pattern of injury. Objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of intramedullary nailing, plating, external fixation and combined techniques used to repair forearm shaft fractures of different severity based on comparative analysis of outcomes. Material and methods Outcomes of 153 patients with forearm shaft fractures treated with IM nailing, plating, external fixation (controls, n = 78; 51.0 %) and combined osteosynthesis with shape memory devices (index group, n = 75; 49.0 %) were comparatively analyzed using criteria offered by Anderson L.D. (consolidation time) and Grace T.G., Eversman W.W. (functional results) and statistical methods. Patients sustained either an isolated fracture of one bone (n = 62; 40.5 %) or combined both bones forearm injuries (n = 44; 28.8 %). A subgroup of complicated injuries included 25 (16.3 %) patients with fracture-dislocations and 22 (14.4 %) patients with multiple fractures (bifocal, comminuted, bone loss of at least 5.0 cm). Results Plating of isolated and combined forearm injuries showed significant advantages over intramedullary nailing with square nail (χ2 = 5.329, p = 0.021). Intramedullary nailing appeared to be more efficacious when supported by thermomechanical memory devices and could be comparable with the results achieved with plating (χ2 = 0.070, p = 0.792). Combined techniques with thermomechanical memory devices were practical for multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations (χ2 = 6.649, p = 0.010). Conclusions Intramedullary nailing with square nails was shown to be efficient in 50.0 % of patients with transverse, oblique fractures of one or both forearm bones and in 20.0 % of fracture-dislocations. The bone consolidated and function recovered in 85.3 to 95.2 % of the patients with of one or both forearm bones fractures repaired either with plating or combined methods with the use of shape memory constructs. Patients with fracture-dislocations, comminuted and segmental fractures showed good results in 75.0 % of the cases addressed with external fixation and external fixation combined with shape memory devices, and in 42.9 % of cases repaired with plating.http://ilizarov-journal.com/files/2018_4_01.pdfforearmfracturecomminutionsegmental fractureexternal fixationintramedullary nailingplatingshape memory deviceoutcome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aleksei A. Panov
Balentina A. Kopysova
Andrei N. Svetashov
spellingShingle Aleksei A. Panov
Balentina A. Kopysova
Andrei N. Svetashov
Comparative analysis of bone fixation in patients with uncomplicated multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations of the forearm
Гений oртопедии
forearm
fracture
comminution
segmental fracture
external fixation
intramedullary nailing
plating
shape memory device
outcome
author_facet Aleksei A. Panov
Balentina A. Kopysova
Andrei N. Svetashov
author_sort Aleksei A. Panov
title Comparative analysis of bone fixation in patients with uncomplicated multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations of the forearm
title_short Comparative analysis of bone fixation in patients with uncomplicated multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations of the forearm
title_full Comparative analysis of bone fixation in patients with uncomplicated multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations of the forearm
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of bone fixation in patients with uncomplicated multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations of the forearm
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of bone fixation in patients with uncomplicated multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations of the forearm
title_sort comparative analysis of bone fixation in patients with uncomplicated multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations of the forearm
publisher Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics
series Гений oртопедии
issn 1028-4427
2542-131X
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Introduction The functional anatomy of the forearm sets up requirements for the choice of fixation constructs and medical technologies of osteosynthesis to be used for particular localization and pattern of injury. Objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of intramedullary nailing, plating, external fixation and combined techniques used to repair forearm shaft fractures of different severity based on comparative analysis of outcomes. Material and methods Outcomes of 153 patients with forearm shaft fractures treated with IM nailing, plating, external fixation (controls, n = 78; 51.0 %) and combined osteosynthesis with shape memory devices (index group, n = 75; 49.0 %) were comparatively analyzed using criteria offered by Anderson L.D. (consolidation time) and Grace T.G., Eversman W.W. (functional results) and statistical methods. Patients sustained either an isolated fracture of one bone (n = 62; 40.5 %) or combined both bones forearm injuries (n = 44; 28.8 %). A subgroup of complicated injuries included 25 (16.3 %) patients with fracture-dislocations and 22 (14.4 %) patients with multiple fractures (bifocal, comminuted, bone loss of at least 5.0 cm). Results Plating of isolated and combined forearm injuries showed significant advantages over intramedullary nailing with square nail (χ2 = 5.329, p = 0.021). Intramedullary nailing appeared to be more efficacious when supported by thermomechanical memory devices and could be comparable with the results achieved with plating (χ2 = 0.070, p = 0.792). Combined techniques with thermomechanical memory devices were practical for multiple fractures and fracture-dislocations (χ2 = 6.649, p = 0.010). Conclusions Intramedullary nailing with square nails was shown to be efficient in 50.0 % of patients with transverse, oblique fractures of one or both forearm bones and in 20.0 % of fracture-dislocations. The bone consolidated and function recovered in 85.3 to 95.2 % of the patients with of one or both forearm bones fractures repaired either with plating or combined methods with the use of shape memory constructs. Patients with fracture-dislocations, comminuted and segmental fractures showed good results in 75.0 % of the cases addressed with external fixation and external fixation combined with shape memory devices, and in 42.9 % of cases repaired with plating.
topic forearm
fracture
comminution
segmental fracture
external fixation
intramedullary nailing
plating
shape memory device
outcome
url http://ilizarov-journal.com/files/2018_4_01.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alekseiapanov comparativeanalysisofbonefixationinpatientswithuncomplicatedmultiplefracturesandfracturedislocationsoftheforearm
AT balentinaakopysova comparativeanalysisofbonefixationinpatientswithuncomplicatedmultiplefracturesandfracturedislocationsoftheforearm
AT andreinsvetashov comparativeanalysisofbonefixationinpatientswithuncomplicatedmultiplefracturesandfracturedislocationsoftheforearm
_version_ 1725664004387373056