Two-step procedure for multi-criteria choice of generating-capacity structure in remote areas

The paper dwells upon the problem of multi-criteria choice of ways to develop generating capacities to supply power to remote consumers. We herein propose a two-step multi-criteria analysis method: choosing promising power-generation technology first, and then specifying the generating-capacity stru...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nefedov Aleksandr, Shakirov Vladislav
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197702009
id doaj-75422feb39b74d72aee5a857543ce424
record_format Article
spelling doaj-75422feb39b74d72aee5a857543ce4242021-02-02T08:56:34ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422019-01-01770200910.1051/e3sconf/20197702009e3sconf_repar18_02009Two-step procedure for multi-criteria choice of generating-capacity structure in remote areasNefedov AleksandrShakirov VladislavThe paper dwells upon the problem of multi-criteria choice of ways to develop generating capacities to supply power to remote consumers. We herein propose a two-step multi-criteria analysis method: choosing promising power-generation technology first, and then specifying the generating-capacity structure. The paper describes the structure of the proposed multi-criteria methods: the interval TOPSIS method for Step 1; for Step 2, an upgraded analytic hierarchy process based on identifying the structure of the decision maker’s preferences. We demonstrate the use of this method with evidence from the Penzhinsky District, Kamchatka Krai. Thermal power plants, hydroelectric power plants, diesel power plants, as well as solar and wind power are analyzed as power sources. Step 1 includes: analyzing the potential power-supply loads in a specific area; formulating alternative power-generation technology; formulating goals and criteria; criterion-based evaluation of alternative options using objective and subjective models; multi-criteria evaluation of alternatives; analyzing the sensitivity of results and the selection of promising technology. Step 2 includes: formulating goals and criteria on the basis of the selected power-generation technologies; formulating the available alternatives; criterion-based evaluation of alternatives; multi-criteria evaluation and final decision-making.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197702009
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nefedov Aleksandr
Shakirov Vladislav
spellingShingle Nefedov Aleksandr
Shakirov Vladislav
Two-step procedure for multi-criteria choice of generating-capacity structure in remote areas
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Nefedov Aleksandr
Shakirov Vladislav
author_sort Nefedov Aleksandr
title Two-step procedure for multi-criteria choice of generating-capacity structure in remote areas
title_short Two-step procedure for multi-criteria choice of generating-capacity structure in remote areas
title_full Two-step procedure for multi-criteria choice of generating-capacity structure in remote areas
title_fullStr Two-step procedure for multi-criteria choice of generating-capacity structure in remote areas
title_full_unstemmed Two-step procedure for multi-criteria choice of generating-capacity structure in remote areas
title_sort two-step procedure for multi-criteria choice of generating-capacity structure in remote areas
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The paper dwells upon the problem of multi-criteria choice of ways to develop generating capacities to supply power to remote consumers. We herein propose a two-step multi-criteria analysis method: choosing promising power-generation technology first, and then specifying the generating-capacity structure. The paper describes the structure of the proposed multi-criteria methods: the interval TOPSIS method for Step 1; for Step 2, an upgraded analytic hierarchy process based on identifying the structure of the decision maker’s preferences. We demonstrate the use of this method with evidence from the Penzhinsky District, Kamchatka Krai. Thermal power plants, hydroelectric power plants, diesel power plants, as well as solar and wind power are analyzed as power sources. Step 1 includes: analyzing the potential power-supply loads in a specific area; formulating alternative power-generation technology; formulating goals and criteria; criterion-based evaluation of alternative options using objective and subjective models; multi-criteria evaluation of alternatives; analyzing the sensitivity of results and the selection of promising technology. Step 2 includes: formulating goals and criteria on the basis of the selected power-generation technologies; formulating the available alternatives; criterion-based evaluation of alternatives; multi-criteria evaluation and final decision-making.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20197702009
work_keys_str_mv AT nefedovaleksandr twostepprocedureformulticriteriachoiceofgeneratingcapacitystructureinremoteareas
AT shakirovvladislav twostepprocedureformulticriteriachoiceofgeneratingcapacitystructureinremoteareas
_version_ 1724296026283573248