Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy
In recent modernity era, especially between big war and the annihilation of communism, the most important political division in democratic countries has been the duality of Right/Left. Often the two biggest rival parties, apart from their different names, have been representing two tendencies, the s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Dulat/pizhūhī |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_11253_ab0dc64787d0ea4ff9c075099f2d574d.pdf |
id |
doaj-751db979917148d4a914c9959c2e9f29 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-751db979917148d4a914c9959c2e9f292020-11-25T03:48:50ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i UniversityDulat/pizhūhī2476-68282020-04-01621295710.22054/TSSQ.2020.11253Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal DemocracyMorteza mardihaIn recent modernity era, especially between big war and the annihilation of communism, the most important political division in democratic countries has been the duality of Right/Left. Often the two biggest rival parties, apart from their different names, have been representing two tendencies, the social democracy and the liberal democracy. The main difference between these two positions has been about functionality and ethicality of welfare state. Our question in this article is the following: From the point view of social and economic mechanism, the intersection of democratic countries is closer to system of preferences of social democracy or liberal democracy? It is to corroboration that, somewhat contrary to the twentieth century, a scientific-experimental and realistic approach to the social planning makes these two positions convergent in a pragmatist framework, and, despite of a propagandist atmosphere of challenge, their theoretical and ideological differences are leaving their seriousness and functionality. The conflict of Tax versus services is transferring from an ideological and ethical principle to a subject for a limited and temporary examination among a group of experts. The existence of welfare state is no more a problem, it is its ranges and limitations which is a subject of discussion and decision. Even the domain of disagreement here is to reduce. http://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_11253_ab0dc64787d0ea4ff9c075099f2d574d.pdfstate social service general budget social planning tax |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Morteza mardiha |
spellingShingle |
Morteza mardiha Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy Dulat/pizhūhī state social service general budget social planning tax |
author_facet |
Morteza mardiha |
author_sort |
Morteza mardiha |
title |
Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy |
title_short |
Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy |
title_full |
Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy |
title_fullStr |
Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy |
title_sort |
welfare state, and the binary of social democracy/liberal democracy |
publisher |
Allameh Tabataba'i University |
series |
Dulat/pizhūhī |
issn |
2476-6828 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
In recent modernity era, especially between big war and the annihilation of communism, the most important political division in democratic countries has been the duality of Right/Left. Often the two biggest rival parties, apart from their different names, have been representing two tendencies, the social democracy and the liberal democracy. The main difference between these two positions has been about functionality and ethicality of welfare state. Our question in this article is the following: From the point view of social and economic mechanism, the intersection of democratic countries is closer to system of preferences of social democracy or liberal democracy? It is to corroboration that, somewhat contrary to the twentieth century, a scientific-experimental and realistic approach to the social planning makes these two positions convergent in a pragmatist framework, and, despite of a propagandist atmosphere of challenge, their theoretical and ideological differences are leaving their seriousness and functionality. The conflict of Tax versus services is transferring from an ideological and ethical principle to a subject for a limited and temporary examination among a group of experts. The existence of welfare state is no more a problem, it is its ranges and limitations which is a subject of discussion and decision. Even the domain of disagreement here is to reduce.
|
topic |
state social service general budget social planning tax |
url |
http://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_11253_ab0dc64787d0ea4ff9c075099f2d574d.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mortezamardiha welfarestateandthebinaryofsocialdemocracyliberaldemocracy |
_version_ |
1724496868763762688 |