Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy

In recent modernity era, especially between big war and the annihilation of communism, the most important political division in democratic countries has been the duality of Right/Left. Often the two biggest rival parties, apart from their different names, have been representing two tendencies, the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Morteza mardiha
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University 2020-04-01
Series:Dulat/pizhūhī
Subjects:
Online Access:http://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_11253_ab0dc64787d0ea4ff9c075099f2d574d.pdf
id doaj-751db979917148d4a914c9959c2e9f29
record_format Article
spelling doaj-751db979917148d4a914c9959c2e9f292020-11-25T03:48:50ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i UniversityDulat/pizhūhī2476-68282020-04-01621295710.22054/TSSQ.2020.11253Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal DemocracyMorteza mardihaIn recent modernity era, especially between big war and the annihilation of communism, the most important political division in democratic countries has been the duality of Right/Left. Often the two biggest rival parties, apart from their different names, have been representing two tendencies, the social democracy and the liberal democracy. The main difference between these two positions has been about functionality and ethicality of welfare state. Our question in this article is the following: From the point view of social and economic mechanism, the intersection of democratic countries is closer to system of preferences of social democracy or liberal democracy? It is to corroboration that, somewhat contrary to the twentieth century, a scientific-experimental and realistic approach to the social planning makes these two positions convergent in a pragmatist framework, and, despite of a propagandist atmosphere of challenge, their theoretical and ideological differences are leaving their seriousness and functionality. The conflict of Tax versus services is transferring from an ideological and ethical principle to a subject for a limited and temporary examination among a group of experts. The existence of welfare state is no more a problem, it is its ranges and limitations which is a subject of discussion and decision. Even the domain of disagreement here is to reduce. http://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_11253_ab0dc64787d0ea4ff9c075099f2d574d.pdfstate social service general budget social planning tax
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Morteza mardiha
spellingShingle Morteza mardiha
Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy
Dulat/pizhūhī
state social service general budget social planning tax
author_facet Morteza mardiha
author_sort Morteza mardiha
title Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy
title_short Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy
title_full Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy
title_fullStr Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy
title_full_unstemmed Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy
title_sort welfare state, and the binary of social democracy/liberal democracy
publisher Allameh Tabataba'i University
series Dulat/pizhūhī
issn 2476-6828
publishDate 2020-04-01
description In recent modernity era, especially between big war and the annihilation of communism, the most important political division in democratic countries has been the duality of Right/Left. Often the two biggest rival parties, apart from their different names, have been representing two tendencies, the social democracy and the liberal democracy. The main difference between these two positions has been about functionality and ethicality of welfare state. Our question in this article is the following: From the point view of social and economic mechanism, the intersection of democratic countries is closer to system of preferences of social democracy or liberal democracy? It is to corroboration that, somewhat contrary to the twentieth century, a scientific-experimental and realistic approach to the social planning makes these two positions convergent in a pragmatist framework, and, despite of a propagandist atmosphere of challenge, their theoretical and ideological differences are leaving their seriousness and functionality. The conflict of Tax versus services is transferring from an ideological and ethical principle to a subject for a limited and temporary examination among a group of experts. The existence of welfare state is no more a problem, it is its ranges and limitations which is a subject of discussion and decision. Even the domain of disagreement here is to reduce.
topic state social service general budget social planning tax
url http://tssq.atu.ac.ir/article_11253_ab0dc64787d0ea4ff9c075099f2d574d.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mortezamardiha welfarestateandthebinaryofsocialdemocracyliberaldemocracy
_version_ 1724496868763762688