Prey selection of lions <i>Panthera leo</i> in a small, enclosed reserve

Annual trends in numbers of ungulate species on a 15 km² reserve from 1993 to 1998, were evaluated in the context of lion Panthera leo reintroduction during 1996, and subsequent predation by them. The ungulate prey base was enumerated annually by aerial counts and a road count that took place during...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: R.J. Power
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2002-12-01
Series:Koedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/32
id doaj-751a2f6aec894f4399abf671ed0e2e00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-751a2f6aec894f4399abf671ed0e2e002020-11-25T00:01:44ZengAOSISKoedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science0075-64582071-07712002-12-01452677525Prey selection of lions <i>Panthera leo</i> in a small, enclosed reserveR.J. Power0University of PretoriaAnnual trends in numbers of ungulate species on a 15 km² reserve from 1993 to 1998, were evaluated in the context of lion Panthera leo reintroduction during 1996, and subsequent predation by them. The ungulate prey base was enumerated annually by aerial counts and a road count that took place during 1998. The lion prey record was obtained from direct observations of a radio-located pride of eight lions and daily reserve management records. All ungulate species that underwent precipituous declines were also the most important prey to lions, comprising over 80 % of their prey, and they were preyed upon according to their availability. Lion predation was causal for the declines in wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus, Blesbok Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi and Warthog Phacochoerus africana, while the decline in Kudu Tragelaphus strepsiceros was only partly ascribed to lions, as other non-lion related mortality sources were identified. The only ungulate species to increase subsequent to lion reintroduction was the Impala Aepyceros melampus, which was furthermore under-selected by lions. The uncontrolled population growth of Impala could have elicited ecological degradation, and it was advised to either not stock Impala, or otherwise control their numbers if lions are unable to do so. Lion hunting success and kill rate, were 21 % (n = 63) and 1 kill/4.4 days, respectively. Three bushpigs Potamochoerus larvatus were killed but not utilised,and this finding is corroborated by an intensive study in Kwazulu-Natal, and this aversion is discussed. Predators can cause unprecedented declines of their prey where the prey are confined to small reserves that have no refuge from predation. On an annual basis, prey may need to be augmented to sustain predators on small reserveshttps://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/32PredationPredator-prey relationshipsSmall population managementSmall reservesWildlife management
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R.J. Power
spellingShingle R.J. Power
Prey selection of lions <i>Panthera leo</i> in a small, enclosed reserve
Koedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science
Predation
Predator-prey relationships
Small population management
Small reserves
Wildlife management
author_facet R.J. Power
author_sort R.J. Power
title Prey selection of lions <i>Panthera leo</i> in a small, enclosed reserve
title_short Prey selection of lions <i>Panthera leo</i> in a small, enclosed reserve
title_full Prey selection of lions <i>Panthera leo</i> in a small, enclosed reserve
title_fullStr Prey selection of lions <i>Panthera leo</i> in a small, enclosed reserve
title_full_unstemmed Prey selection of lions <i>Panthera leo</i> in a small, enclosed reserve
title_sort prey selection of lions <i>panthera leo</i> in a small, enclosed reserve
publisher AOSIS
series Koedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science
issn 0075-6458
2071-0771
publishDate 2002-12-01
description Annual trends in numbers of ungulate species on a 15 km² reserve from 1993 to 1998, were evaluated in the context of lion Panthera leo reintroduction during 1996, and subsequent predation by them. The ungulate prey base was enumerated annually by aerial counts and a road count that took place during 1998. The lion prey record was obtained from direct observations of a radio-located pride of eight lions and daily reserve management records. All ungulate species that underwent precipituous declines were also the most important prey to lions, comprising over 80 % of their prey, and they were preyed upon according to their availability. Lion predation was causal for the declines in wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus, Blesbok Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi and Warthog Phacochoerus africana, while the decline in Kudu Tragelaphus strepsiceros was only partly ascribed to lions, as other non-lion related mortality sources were identified. The only ungulate species to increase subsequent to lion reintroduction was the Impala Aepyceros melampus, which was furthermore under-selected by lions. The uncontrolled population growth of Impala could have elicited ecological degradation, and it was advised to either not stock Impala, or otherwise control their numbers if lions are unable to do so. Lion hunting success and kill rate, were 21 % (n = 63) and 1 kill/4.4 days, respectively. Three bushpigs Potamochoerus larvatus were killed but not utilised,and this finding is corroborated by an intensive study in Kwazulu-Natal, and this aversion is discussed. Predators can cause unprecedented declines of their prey where the prey are confined to small reserves that have no refuge from predation. On an annual basis, prey may need to be augmented to sustain predators on small reserves
topic Predation
Predator-prey relationships
Small population management
Small reserves
Wildlife management
url https://koedoe.co.za/index.php/koedoe/article/view/32
work_keys_str_mv AT rjpower preyselectionoflionsipantheraleoiinasmallenclosedreserve
_version_ 1725440669609099264