Screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendations

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Due to the important role of depression in major illnesses, screening measures for depression are commonly used in medical research. The protocol for managing participants with positive screens is unclear and raises ethical concerns....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sheehan Aisling M, McGee Hannah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2013-01-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/14/4
id doaj-74f79381b8a146e0a77a7630f986fe8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-74f79381b8a146e0a77a7630f986fe8f2020-11-25T01:59:45ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392013-01-01141410.1186/1472-6939-14-4Screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendationsSheehan Aisling MMcGee Hannah<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Due to the important role of depression in major illnesses, screening measures for depression are commonly used in medical research. The protocol for managing participants with positive screens is unclear and raises ethical concerns. The aim of this article is to identify and critically discuss the ethical issues that arise when a positive screen for depression is detected, and offer some guidance on managing these issues.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Deciding on whether to report positive screens to healthcare practitioners is both an ethical and a pragmatic dilemma. Evidence suggests that reporting positive depression screens should only be considered in the context of collaborative care. Possible adverse effects, such as the impact of false-positive results, potentially inappropriate labelling, and potentially inappropriate treatment also need to be considered. If possible, the psychometric properties of the selected screening measure should be determined in the target population, and a threshold for depression that minimises the rate of false-positive results should be chosen. It should be clearly communicated to practitioners that screening scores are not diagnostic for depression, and they should be informed about the diagnostic accuracy of the measure. Research participants need to be made aware of the consequences of the detection of high scores on screening measures, and to be fully informed about the implications of the research protocol.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>Further research is needed and the experiences of researchers, participants, and practitioners need to be collated before the value of reporting positive screens for depression can be ascertained. In developing research protocols, the ethical challenges highlighted should be considered. Participants must be agreeable to the agreed protocol and efforts should be made to minimise potentially adverse effects.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/14/4DepressionScreeningEthicsResearch
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sheehan Aisling M
McGee Hannah
spellingShingle Sheehan Aisling M
McGee Hannah
Screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendations
BMC Medical Ethics
Depression
Screening
Ethics
Research
author_facet Sheehan Aisling M
McGee Hannah
author_sort Sheehan Aisling M
title Screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendations
title_short Screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendations
title_full Screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendations
title_fullStr Screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendations
title_sort screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendations
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Ethics
issn 1472-6939
publishDate 2013-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Due to the important role of depression in major illnesses, screening measures for depression are commonly used in medical research. The protocol for managing participants with positive screens is unclear and raises ethical concerns. The aim of this article is to identify and critically discuss the ethical issues that arise when a positive screen for depression is detected, and offer some guidance on managing these issues.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Deciding on whether to report positive screens to healthcare practitioners is both an ethical and a pragmatic dilemma. Evidence suggests that reporting positive depression screens should only be considered in the context of collaborative care. Possible adverse effects, such as the impact of false-positive results, potentially inappropriate labelling, and potentially inappropriate treatment also need to be considered. If possible, the psychometric properties of the selected screening measure should be determined in the target population, and a threshold for depression that minimises the rate of false-positive results should be chosen. It should be clearly communicated to practitioners that screening scores are not diagnostic for depression, and they should be informed about the diagnostic accuracy of the measure. Research participants need to be made aware of the consequences of the detection of high scores on screening measures, and to be fully informed about the implications of the research protocol.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>Further research is needed and the experiences of researchers, participants, and practitioners need to be collated before the value of reporting positive screens for depression can be ascertained. In developing research protocols, the ethical challenges highlighted should be considered. Participants must be agreeable to the agreed protocol and efforts should be made to minimise potentially adverse effects.</p>
topic Depression
Screening
Ethics
Research
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/14/4
work_keys_str_mv AT sheehanaislingm screeningfordepressioninmedicalresearchethicalchallengesandrecommendations
AT mcgeehannah screeningfordepressioninmedicalresearchethicalchallengesandrecommendations
_version_ 1724962714718044160