Salience and Strategy Choice in 2 × 2 Games
We present a model of boundedly rational play in single-shot 2 × 2 games. Players choose strategies based on the perceived salience of their own payoffs and, if own-payoff salience is uninformative, on the perceived salience of their opponent’s payoffs. When own payoffs are salient, the model’s pre...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-10-01
|
Series: | Games |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/6/4/521 |
id |
doaj-74f77b01d3ad446bb1fc659e9b989c41 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-74f77b01d3ad446bb1fc659e9b989c412020-11-25T00:07:55ZengMDPI AGGames2073-43362015-10-016452155910.3390/g6040521g6040521Salience and Strategy Choice in 2 × 2 GamesJonathan W. Leland0Mark Schneider1Decision, Risk and Management Science Program, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, USAEconomic Science Institute, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA 92866, USAWe present a model of boundedly rational play in single-shot 2 × 2 games. Players choose strategies based on the perceived salience of their own payoffs and, if own-payoff salience is uninformative, on the perceived salience of their opponent’s payoffs. When own payoffs are salient, the model’s predictions correspond to those of Level-1 players in a cognitive hierarchy model. When it is the other player’s payoffs that are salient, the predictions of the model correspond to those of traditional game theory. The model provides unique predictions for the entire class of 2 × 2 games. It identifies games where a Nash equilibrium will always occur, ones where it will never occur, and ones where it will occur only for certain payoff values. It also predicts the outcome of games for which there are no pure Nash equilibria. Experimental results supporting these predictions are presented.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/6/4/521behavioral game theorybounded rationalitysalienceheuristics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jonathan W. Leland Mark Schneider |
spellingShingle |
Jonathan W. Leland Mark Schneider Salience and Strategy Choice in 2 × 2 Games Games behavioral game theory bounded rationality salience heuristics |
author_facet |
Jonathan W. Leland Mark Schneider |
author_sort |
Jonathan W. Leland |
title |
Salience and Strategy Choice in 2 × 2 Games |
title_short |
Salience and Strategy Choice in 2 × 2 Games |
title_full |
Salience and Strategy Choice in 2 × 2 Games |
title_fullStr |
Salience and Strategy Choice in 2 × 2 Games |
title_full_unstemmed |
Salience and Strategy Choice in 2 × 2 Games |
title_sort |
salience and strategy choice in 2 × 2 games |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Games |
issn |
2073-4336 |
publishDate |
2015-10-01 |
description |
We present a model of boundedly rational play in single-shot 2 × 2 games. Players choose strategies based on the perceived salience of their own payoffs and, if own-payoff salience is uninformative, on the perceived salience of their opponent’s payoffs. When own payoffs are salient, the model’s predictions correspond to those of Level-1 players in a cognitive hierarchy model. When it is the other player’s payoffs that are salient, the predictions of the model correspond to those of traditional game theory. The model provides unique predictions for the entire class of 2 × 2 games. It identifies games where a Nash equilibrium will always occur, ones where it will never occur, and ones where it will occur only for certain payoff values. It also predicts the outcome of games for which there are no pure Nash equilibria. Experimental results supporting these predictions are presented. |
topic |
behavioral game theory bounded rationality salience heuristics |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/6/4/521 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jonathanwleland salienceandstrategychoicein22games AT markschneider salienceandstrategychoicein22games |
_version_ |
1725417812276543488 |