A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness

This study presents an analysis of the performance of students from disadvantaged schools (DS) on first-year psychology examination questions. The analysis focuses on the process of enquiry that underpins different kinds of questions (factual, relational and conceptual) of increasing levels of diffi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jill Bradbury, Ronald Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academy of Science of South Africa 2011-03-01
Series:South African Journal of Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://192.168.0.108/index.php/sajs/article/view/9870
id doaj-74d5e28e3eb2408e834de27d3bab576e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-74d5e28e3eb2408e834de27d3bab576e2021-07-05T11:44:25ZengAcademy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science1996-74892011-03-011073/4A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparednessJill Bradbury0Ronald Miller1University of the WitwatersrandUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalThis study presents an analysis of the performance of students from disadvantaged schools (DS) on first-year psychology examination questions. The analysis focuses on the process of enquiry that underpins different kinds of questions (factual, relational and conceptual) of increasing levels of difficulty. The findings indicate that success or failure is not simply a measure of the reproduction of content but is a function of the (in)appropriate form of responses that students generate in engaging with different kinds of questions. This has important implications for the conceptualisation of academic literacy and the development of responsive curricula in the South African higher education context. In order to further understand the reasons for the disproportionately high failure rate among students from disadvantaged schools, the responses of DS failing students are compared to those of their peers from advantaged schools (AS) who also failed the course. This comparative analysis reveals very different patterns of questioning engagement among the two failing groups of students, providing empirical support for the argument that underpreparedness is a distinct systemic phenomenon rather than simply failure by another name.http://192.168.0.108/index.php/sajs/article/view/9870academic literacydisadvantaged schoolingeducationpsychologyquestioningunderpreparedness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jill Bradbury
Ronald Miller
spellingShingle Jill Bradbury
Ronald Miller
A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness
South African Journal of Science
academic literacy
disadvantaged schooling
education
psychology
questioning
underpreparedness
author_facet Jill Bradbury
Ronald Miller
author_sort Jill Bradbury
title A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness
title_short A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness
title_full A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness
title_fullStr A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness
title_full_unstemmed A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness
title_sort failure by any other name: the phenomenon of underpreparedness
publisher Academy of Science of South Africa
series South African Journal of Science
issn 1996-7489
publishDate 2011-03-01
description This study presents an analysis of the performance of students from disadvantaged schools (DS) on first-year psychology examination questions. The analysis focuses on the process of enquiry that underpins different kinds of questions (factual, relational and conceptual) of increasing levels of difficulty. The findings indicate that success or failure is not simply a measure of the reproduction of content but is a function of the (in)appropriate form of responses that students generate in engaging with different kinds of questions. This has important implications for the conceptualisation of academic literacy and the development of responsive curricula in the South African higher education context. In order to further understand the reasons for the disproportionately high failure rate among students from disadvantaged schools, the responses of DS failing students are compared to those of their peers from advantaged schools (AS) who also failed the course. This comparative analysis reveals very different patterns of questioning engagement among the two failing groups of students, providing empirical support for the argument that underpreparedness is a distinct systemic phenomenon rather than simply failure by another name.
topic academic literacy
disadvantaged schooling
education
psychology
questioning
underpreparedness
url http://192.168.0.108/index.php/sajs/article/view/9870
work_keys_str_mv AT jillbradbury afailurebyanyothernamethephenomenonofunderpreparedness
AT ronaldmiller afailurebyanyothernamethephenomenonofunderpreparedness
AT jillbradbury failurebyanyothernamethephenomenonofunderpreparedness
AT ronaldmiller failurebyanyothernamethephenomenonofunderpreparedness
_version_ 1721318642674565120