A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness
This study presents an analysis of the performance of students from disadvantaged schools (DS) on first-year psychology examination questions. The analysis focuses on the process of enquiry that underpins different kinds of questions (factual, relational and conceptual) of increasing levels of diffi...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Academy of Science of South Africa
2011-03-01
|
Series: | South African Journal of Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://192.168.0.108/index.php/sajs/article/view/9870 |
id |
doaj-74d5e28e3eb2408e834de27d3bab576e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-74d5e28e3eb2408e834de27d3bab576e2021-07-05T11:44:25ZengAcademy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science1996-74892011-03-011073/4A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparednessJill Bradbury0Ronald Miller1University of the WitwatersrandUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalThis study presents an analysis of the performance of students from disadvantaged schools (DS) on first-year psychology examination questions. The analysis focuses on the process of enquiry that underpins different kinds of questions (factual, relational and conceptual) of increasing levels of difficulty. The findings indicate that success or failure is not simply a measure of the reproduction of content but is a function of the (in)appropriate form of responses that students generate in engaging with different kinds of questions. This has important implications for the conceptualisation of academic literacy and the development of responsive curricula in the South African higher education context. In order to further understand the reasons for the disproportionately high failure rate among students from disadvantaged schools, the responses of DS failing students are compared to those of their peers from advantaged schools (AS) who also failed the course. This comparative analysis reveals very different patterns of questioning engagement among the two failing groups of students, providing empirical support for the argument that underpreparedness is a distinct systemic phenomenon rather than simply failure by another name.http://192.168.0.108/index.php/sajs/article/view/9870academic literacydisadvantaged schoolingeducationpsychologyquestioningunderpreparedness |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jill Bradbury Ronald Miller |
spellingShingle |
Jill Bradbury Ronald Miller A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness South African Journal of Science academic literacy disadvantaged schooling education psychology questioning underpreparedness |
author_facet |
Jill Bradbury Ronald Miller |
author_sort |
Jill Bradbury |
title |
A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness |
title_short |
A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness |
title_full |
A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness |
title_fullStr |
A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness |
title_full_unstemmed |
A failure by any other name: The phenomenon of underpreparedness |
title_sort |
failure by any other name: the phenomenon of underpreparedness |
publisher |
Academy of Science of South Africa |
series |
South African Journal of Science |
issn |
1996-7489 |
publishDate |
2011-03-01 |
description |
This study presents an analysis of the performance of students from disadvantaged schools (DS) on first-year psychology examination questions. The analysis focuses on the process of enquiry that underpins different kinds of questions (factual, relational and conceptual) of increasing levels of difficulty. The findings indicate that success or failure is not simply a measure of the reproduction of content but is a function of the (in)appropriate form of responses that students generate in engaging with different kinds of questions. This has important implications for the conceptualisation of academic literacy and the development of responsive curricula in the South African higher education context. In order to further understand the reasons for the disproportionately high failure rate among students from disadvantaged schools, the responses of DS failing students are compared to those of their peers from advantaged schools (AS) who also failed the course. This comparative analysis reveals very different patterns of questioning engagement among the two failing groups of students, providing empirical support for the argument that underpreparedness is a distinct systemic phenomenon rather than simply failure by another name. |
topic |
academic literacy disadvantaged schooling education psychology questioning underpreparedness |
url |
http://192.168.0.108/index.php/sajs/article/view/9870 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jillbradbury afailurebyanyothernamethephenomenonofunderpreparedness AT ronaldmiller afailurebyanyothernamethephenomenonofunderpreparedness AT jillbradbury failurebyanyothernamethephenomenonofunderpreparedness AT ronaldmiller failurebyanyothernamethephenomenonofunderpreparedness |
_version_ |
1721318642674565120 |