Environmental and financial performance evaluation of a helicopter’s canopy production using different materials and manufacturing processes

In the present work Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing models (LCC) were developed for quantifying the financial and environmental performance of different material (carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting and carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites) and manufacturing scenarios...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katsiropoulos Ch.V., Loukopoulos A., Pantelakis Sp.G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823300004
id doaj-74d0ffbb3097454caa4f8b90213fcf3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-74d0ffbb3097454caa4f8b90213fcf3a2021-02-02T02:43:32ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-012330000410.1051/matecconf/201823300004matecconf_easn_ceas2018_00004Environmental and financial performance evaluation of a helicopter’s canopy production using different materials and manufacturing processesKatsiropoulos Ch.V.Loukopoulos A.Pantelakis Sp.G.In the present work Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing models (LCC) were developed for quantifying the financial and environmental performance of different material (carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting and carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites) and manufacturing scenarios (autoclave, RTM and CDF) associated with the production of aeronautical structural components. To validate the models developed, they were implemented for the case of a helicopter’s canopy. The results from the analysis pointed out the environmental and financial 1advantage of producing the canopy from carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting composites involving RTM as the manufacturing process. On the other hand, the environmental and financial viability of the scenarios including thermoplastic composites as the material of choice is impaired from both the high embodied energy and raw material cost of PEEK. However, potential benefits from thermoplastic composites like recyclability and reusability as well as the high production rates that they offer and not taken into account in this study could improve their environmental and financial viability. This underlines the need to include potential reusing and recycling applications of the composites, as well as circular economy considerations to the criteria for designing an aircraft structure, selecting the material for this structure and finally manufacturing the structure.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823300004
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katsiropoulos Ch.V.
Loukopoulos A.
Pantelakis Sp.G.
spellingShingle Katsiropoulos Ch.V.
Loukopoulos A.
Pantelakis Sp.G.
Environmental and financial performance evaluation of a helicopter’s canopy production using different materials and manufacturing processes
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Katsiropoulos Ch.V.
Loukopoulos A.
Pantelakis Sp.G.
author_sort Katsiropoulos Ch.V.
title Environmental and financial performance evaluation of a helicopter’s canopy production using different materials and manufacturing processes
title_short Environmental and financial performance evaluation of a helicopter’s canopy production using different materials and manufacturing processes
title_full Environmental and financial performance evaluation of a helicopter’s canopy production using different materials and manufacturing processes
title_fullStr Environmental and financial performance evaluation of a helicopter’s canopy production using different materials and manufacturing processes
title_full_unstemmed Environmental and financial performance evaluation of a helicopter’s canopy production using different materials and manufacturing processes
title_sort environmental and financial performance evaluation of a helicopter’s canopy production using different materials and manufacturing processes
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description In the present work Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing models (LCC) were developed for quantifying the financial and environmental performance of different material (carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting and carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites) and manufacturing scenarios (autoclave, RTM and CDF) associated with the production of aeronautical structural components. To validate the models developed, they were implemented for the case of a helicopter’s canopy. The results from the analysis pointed out the environmental and financial 1advantage of producing the canopy from carbon fiber reinforced thermosetting composites involving RTM as the manufacturing process. On the other hand, the environmental and financial viability of the scenarios including thermoplastic composites as the material of choice is impaired from both the high embodied energy and raw material cost of PEEK. However, potential benefits from thermoplastic composites like recyclability and reusability as well as the high production rates that they offer and not taken into account in this study could improve their environmental and financial viability. This underlines the need to include potential reusing and recycling applications of the composites, as well as circular economy considerations to the criteria for designing an aircraft structure, selecting the material for this structure and finally manufacturing the structure.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823300004
work_keys_str_mv AT katsiropouloschv environmentalandfinancialperformanceevaluationofahelicopterscanopyproductionusingdifferentmaterialsandmanufacturingprocesses
AT loukopoulosa environmentalandfinancialperformanceevaluationofahelicopterscanopyproductionusingdifferentmaterialsandmanufacturingprocesses
AT pantelakisspg environmentalandfinancialperformanceevaluationofahelicopterscanopyproductionusingdifferentmaterialsandmanufacturingprocesses
_version_ 1724309357597818880