Comparison of muscle activation imbalance following core stability or general exercises in nonspecific low back pain: a quasi-randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Low back pain causes changes in muscle activation patterns. Knowing how different exercises may improve altered muscle activation is useful in the treatment of patients. The aim of the study was to investigate whether there was a difference in the pattern of muscle activation in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: MohammadBagher Shamsi, Maryam Mirzaei, Mohammad HamediRad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-04-01
Series:BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13102-020-00173-0
id doaj-74cbaa19c0944b3599af2e7cebb9ec24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-74cbaa19c0944b3599af2e7cebb9ec242020-11-25T03:00:27ZengBMCBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation2052-18472020-04-011211910.1186/s13102-020-00173-0Comparison of muscle activation imbalance following core stability or general exercises in nonspecific low back pain: a quasi-randomized controlled trialMohammadBagher Shamsi0Maryam Mirzaei1Mohammad HamediRad2School of Allied Medical Sciences, Kermanshah University of Medical SciencesSchool of Allied Medical Sciences, Kermanshah University of Medical SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignAbstract Background Low back pain causes changes in muscle activation patterns. Knowing how different exercises may improve altered muscle activation is useful in the treatment of patients. The aim of the study was to investigate whether there was a difference in the pattern of muscle activation in chronic nonspecific low back pain sufferers following core stability exercise (CSE) and general exercise (GE). Methods Fifty-six non-specific chronic LBP subjects were randomly assigned to either groups (28 participants in CSE and 28 in GE group). Both groups performed 16 sessions of an exercise program for about 5 weeks. Pain, disability and trunk muscle activation patterns (using surface electromyography) were measured at baseline and post-training. Results After the intervention period, antagonist coactivation ratio did not change in either groups. Though all compensated imbalance ratios (residual unequal muscular activity after cancellation of directionality) decreased towards negative (imbalance to left side) only this change for total muscles ratio in GE was significant (mean difference in GE group, 0.15; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.28; p-value of paired t-test: 0.022); (mean difference in CSE, 0.02; 95% CI: − 0.07 to 0.11; p-value of paired t-test: 0.614).. No overall significantly decrease in uncompensated imbalance ratio (absolute imbalance values without cancellation directionality) was observed. Pain and disability decreased significantly in both groups. However, there was no difference between two groups in either of the variables after the intervention. Conclusions Both exercise programs reduced pain and disability and made or kept trunk muscle activation imbalance to the left side. The effects of two exercises on pain, disability and antagonist coactivation or imbalance ratios were not different. Trial registration This study was registered in the Iranian Clinical Trial Center with the code IRCT201111098035N1 , Registered Jan 21, 2013.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13102-020-00173-0Core stability exerciseElectromyographyGeneral exerciseMuscle activation imbalanceNonspecific low Back pain
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author MohammadBagher Shamsi
Maryam Mirzaei
Mohammad HamediRad
spellingShingle MohammadBagher Shamsi
Maryam Mirzaei
Mohammad HamediRad
Comparison of muscle activation imbalance following core stability or general exercises in nonspecific low back pain: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Core stability exercise
Electromyography
General exercise
Muscle activation imbalance
Nonspecific low Back pain
author_facet MohammadBagher Shamsi
Maryam Mirzaei
Mohammad HamediRad
author_sort MohammadBagher Shamsi
title Comparison of muscle activation imbalance following core stability or general exercises in nonspecific low back pain: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of muscle activation imbalance following core stability or general exercises in nonspecific low back pain: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of muscle activation imbalance following core stability or general exercises in nonspecific low back pain: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of muscle activation imbalance following core stability or general exercises in nonspecific low back pain: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of muscle activation imbalance following core stability or general exercises in nonspecific low back pain: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of muscle activation imbalance following core stability or general exercises in nonspecific low back pain: a quasi-randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
issn 2052-1847
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Abstract Background Low back pain causes changes in muscle activation patterns. Knowing how different exercises may improve altered muscle activation is useful in the treatment of patients. The aim of the study was to investigate whether there was a difference in the pattern of muscle activation in chronic nonspecific low back pain sufferers following core stability exercise (CSE) and general exercise (GE). Methods Fifty-six non-specific chronic LBP subjects were randomly assigned to either groups (28 participants in CSE and 28 in GE group). Both groups performed 16 sessions of an exercise program for about 5 weeks. Pain, disability and trunk muscle activation patterns (using surface electromyography) were measured at baseline and post-training. Results After the intervention period, antagonist coactivation ratio did not change in either groups. Though all compensated imbalance ratios (residual unequal muscular activity after cancellation of directionality) decreased towards negative (imbalance to left side) only this change for total muscles ratio in GE was significant (mean difference in GE group, 0.15; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.28; p-value of paired t-test: 0.022); (mean difference in CSE, 0.02; 95% CI: − 0.07 to 0.11; p-value of paired t-test: 0.614).. No overall significantly decrease in uncompensated imbalance ratio (absolute imbalance values without cancellation directionality) was observed. Pain and disability decreased significantly in both groups. However, there was no difference between two groups in either of the variables after the intervention. Conclusions Both exercise programs reduced pain and disability and made or kept trunk muscle activation imbalance to the left side. The effects of two exercises on pain, disability and antagonist coactivation or imbalance ratios were not different. Trial registration This study was registered in the Iranian Clinical Trial Center with the code IRCT201111098035N1 , Registered Jan 21, 2013.
topic Core stability exercise
Electromyography
General exercise
Muscle activation imbalance
Nonspecific low Back pain
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13102-020-00173-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadbaghershamsi comparisonofmuscleactivationimbalancefollowingcorestabilityorgeneralexercisesinnonspecificlowbackpainaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maryammirzaei comparisonofmuscleactivationimbalancefollowingcorestabilityorgeneralexercisesinnonspecificlowbackpainaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohammadhamedirad comparisonofmuscleactivationimbalancefollowingcorestabilityorgeneralexercisesinnonspecificlowbackpainaquasirandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724698097252040704