(Becoming) Experts In Meaning Ambiguities

• Main Author: Francesca Ervas
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente 2015-05-01
• Series: Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
• Subjects: Lexical ambiguity; polysemy; semantic underdetermination
• Online Access: http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/89

The discrepancy between the theoretical problems experts raise on polysemy, and the ease with which it is everyday understood by speakers, has been defined as the polysemy paradox. The same could be said for other forms of meaning ambiguity in the non-literal side, as for instance metaphor. A sort of metaphor paradox is raised by the fact that metaphor usually goes unnoticed for most people, even though experts claim that it constitutes a theoretical challenge for understanding human thought. In both polysemy and metaphor cases, people’s intuitions clash with experts’ intuitions. Moreover, experts seem to disagree on the very identification criterion of the linguistic phenomena. Deference to experts is anyway important in semantic applications, such as translation, where subtle distinctions in word meaning prove to be not only useful but also essential. However, the apparently wide gap between people’s and experts’ intuitions could be reduced once the paradoxes of meaning ambiguity are explained as a result of semantic underdetermination.