Systemic centrality and systemic communities in financial networks

A systemically important firm could be too-connected-to-fail and/or too-important-to-fail,two properties which centrality measures and community detection methods can capture respectively.This paper examines the performance of these measures in a variance decomposition global financialnetwork. Too-c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jorge A. Chan-Lau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIMS Press 2018-06-01
Series:Quantitative Finance and Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/QFE.2018.2.468/fulltext.html
id doaj-74b2dd9931764c6f9eaa55770ad50207
record_format Article
spelling doaj-74b2dd9931764c6f9eaa55770ad502072020-11-24T20:42:08ZengAIMS PressQuantitative Finance and Economics2573-01342018-06-012246849610.3934/QFE.2018.2.468Systemic centrality and systemic communities in financial networksJorge A. Chan-Lau0International Monetary Fund, 700 19th St NW, Washington, DC 20431, USAA systemically important firm could be too-connected-to-fail and/or too-important-to-fail,two properties which centrality measures and community detection methods can capture respectively.This paper examines the performance of these measures in a variance decomposition global financialnetwork. Too-connected-to-fail risk and vulnerability rankings are quite robust to the choice ofcentrality measure. The PageRank centrality measure, however, does not seem as suitable for assessingvulnerabilities. Two community identification methods, edge betweenness and the map equation(Infomap) were used to identify systemic communities, which in turn capture the too-important-tofaildimension of systemic risk. The first method appears more robust to di erent weighting schemesbut tends to isolate too many firms. The second method exhibits the opposite characteristics. Overall,the analysis suggests that centrality measures and community identification methods complement eachother for assessing systemic risk in financial networks.http://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/QFE.2018.2.468/fulltext.htmlcentrality| community detection| edge-betweenness| financial network| map equation| power law| systemic risk
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jorge A. Chan-Lau
spellingShingle Jorge A. Chan-Lau
Systemic centrality and systemic communities in financial networks
Quantitative Finance and Economics
centrality| community detection| edge-betweenness| financial network| map equation| power law| systemic risk
author_facet Jorge A. Chan-Lau
author_sort Jorge A. Chan-Lau
title Systemic centrality and systemic communities in financial networks
title_short Systemic centrality and systemic communities in financial networks
title_full Systemic centrality and systemic communities in financial networks
title_fullStr Systemic centrality and systemic communities in financial networks
title_full_unstemmed Systemic centrality and systemic communities in financial networks
title_sort systemic centrality and systemic communities in financial networks
publisher AIMS Press
series Quantitative Finance and Economics
issn 2573-0134
publishDate 2018-06-01
description A systemically important firm could be too-connected-to-fail and/or too-important-to-fail,two properties which centrality measures and community detection methods can capture respectively.This paper examines the performance of these measures in a variance decomposition global financialnetwork. Too-connected-to-fail risk and vulnerability rankings are quite robust to the choice ofcentrality measure. The PageRank centrality measure, however, does not seem as suitable for assessingvulnerabilities. Two community identification methods, edge betweenness and the map equation(Infomap) were used to identify systemic communities, which in turn capture the too-important-tofaildimension of systemic risk. The first method appears more robust to di erent weighting schemesbut tends to isolate too many firms. The second method exhibits the opposite characteristics. Overall,the analysis suggests that centrality measures and community identification methods complement eachother for assessing systemic risk in financial networks.
topic centrality| community detection| edge-betweenness| financial network| map equation| power law| systemic risk
url http://www.aimspress.com/article/10.3934/QFE.2018.2.468/fulltext.html
work_keys_str_mv AT jorgeachanlau systemiccentralityandsystemiccommunitiesinfinancialnetworks
_version_ 1716823084078465024