Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: Implications for clinicians

Depending on the pathological findings, up to 60% of prostate cancer patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) will develop biochemical relapse and require further local treatment. Radiotherapy (RT) immediately after RP may potentially eradicate any residual localized microscopic disease in th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernanda G Herrera, Dominik R Berthold
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2016.00117/full
id doaj-749c1e1193ab4597a931614ba71ee535
record_format Article
spelling doaj-749c1e1193ab4597a931614ba71ee5352020-11-25T00:05:05ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2016-05-01610.3389/fonc.2016.00117190688Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: Implications for cliniciansFernanda G Herrera0Dominik R Berthold1Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)Depending on the pathological findings, up to 60% of prostate cancer patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) will develop biochemical relapse and require further local treatment. Radiotherapy (RT) immediately after RP may potentially eradicate any residual localized microscopic disease in the prostate bed, and it is associated with improved biochemical, clinical progression free survival, and overall survival in patients with high-risk pathological features according to published randomized trials. Offering immediate adjuvant RT to all men with high-risk pathological factors we are over-treating around 50% of patients who would anyway be cancer-free, exposing them to unnecessary toxicity and adding costs to the health care system. The current dilemma is, thus, whether to deliver adjuvant immediate RT solely on the basis of high-risk pathology, but in the absence of measurable prostate-specific antigen, or whether early salvage radiotherapy would yield equivalent outcomes. Randomized trials are ongoing to definitely answer this question. Retrospective analyses suggest that there is a dose–response favoring doses >70 Gy to the prostate bed. The evidence regarding the role of androgen deprivation therapy is emerging, and ongoing randomized trials are underway.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2016.00117/fullprostate cancerRadical ProstatectomyIMRTandrogen deprivation therapyVMATadjuvant radiotherapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fernanda G Herrera
Dominik R Berthold
spellingShingle Fernanda G Herrera
Dominik R Berthold
Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: Implications for clinicians
Frontiers in Oncology
prostate cancer
Radical Prostatectomy
IMRT
androgen deprivation therapy
VMAT
adjuvant radiotherapy
author_facet Fernanda G Herrera
Dominik R Berthold
author_sort Fernanda G Herrera
title Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: Implications for clinicians
title_short Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: Implications for clinicians
title_full Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: Implications for clinicians
title_fullStr Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: Implications for clinicians
title_full_unstemmed Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: Implications for clinicians
title_sort radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: implications for clinicians
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2016-05-01
description Depending on the pathological findings, up to 60% of prostate cancer patients who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) will develop biochemical relapse and require further local treatment. Radiotherapy (RT) immediately after RP may potentially eradicate any residual localized microscopic disease in the prostate bed, and it is associated with improved biochemical, clinical progression free survival, and overall survival in patients with high-risk pathological features according to published randomized trials. Offering immediate adjuvant RT to all men with high-risk pathological factors we are over-treating around 50% of patients who would anyway be cancer-free, exposing them to unnecessary toxicity and adding costs to the health care system. The current dilemma is, thus, whether to deliver adjuvant immediate RT solely on the basis of high-risk pathology, but in the absence of measurable prostate-specific antigen, or whether early salvage radiotherapy would yield equivalent outcomes. Randomized trials are ongoing to definitely answer this question. Retrospective analyses suggest that there is a dose–response favoring doses >70 Gy to the prostate bed. The evidence regarding the role of androgen deprivation therapy is emerging, and ongoing randomized trials are underway.
topic prostate cancer
Radical Prostatectomy
IMRT
androgen deprivation therapy
VMAT
adjuvant radiotherapy
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2016.00117/full
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandagherrera radiationtherapyafterradicalprostatectomyimplicationsforclinicians
AT dominikrberthold radiationtherapyafterradicalprostatectomyimplicationsforclinicians
_version_ 1725426372485054464