Examining the streams of a retention policy to understand the politics of high-stakes reform.
Using John Kingdon's (2003) multiple streams approach to agenda setting, I analyze how key actors within the state of Wisconsin understood the need to construct and implement the state's No Social Promotion statutes to improve students' academic performance. Policymakers within the st...
Main Author: | Christopher P. Brown |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Arizona State University
2007-04-01
|
Series: | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/57 |
Similar Items
-
Perceptions of Middle and High School Principals in Virginia on High-Stakes Testing
by: Coppage-Miller, Jacqueline C.
Published: (2015) -
Examining a Public Montessori School’s Response to the Pressures of High-Stakes Accountability
by: Corrie Rebecca Block
Published: (2015-11-01) -
High-stakes testing and student achievement: Updated analyses with NAEP data
by: Sharon Nichols, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01) -
Global perspectives on high-stakes teacher accountability policies: An introduction
by: Jessica Holloway, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Market-oriented reforms and “high stakes” testing: Incentives and consequences
by: Anne West, et al.
Published: (2005-06-01)