The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment

A common motivation for increasing open access to research findings and data is the potential to create economic benefits—but evidence is patchy and diverse. This study systematically reviewed the evidence on what kinds of economic impacts (positive and negative) open science can have, how...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael J. Fell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-07-01
Series:Publications
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/3/46
id doaj-74954d2feab64ba993b5d69cb2263d43
record_format Article
spelling doaj-74954d2feab64ba993b5d69cb2263d432020-11-24T21:34:06ZengMDPI AGPublications2304-67752019-07-01734610.3390/publications7030046publications7030046The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence AssessmentMichael J. Fell0UCL Energy Institute, University College London, London WC1H 0NN, UKA common motivation for increasing open access to research findings and data is the potential to create economic benefits—but evidence is patchy and diverse. This study systematically reviewed the evidence on what kinds of economic impacts (positive and negative) open science can have, how these comes about, and how benefits could be maximized. Use of open science outputs often leaves no obvious trace, so most evidence of impacts is based on interviews, surveys, inference based on existing costs, and modelling approaches. There is indicative evidence that open access to findings/data can lead to savings in access costs, labour costs and transaction costs. There are examples of open science enabling new products, services, companies, research and collaborations. Modelling studies suggest higher returns to R&D if open access permits greater accessibility and efficiency of use of findings. Barriers include lack of skills capacity in search, interpretation and text mining, and lack of clarity around where benefits accrue. There are also contextual considerations around who benefits most from open science (e.g., sectors, small vs. larger companies, types of dataset). Recommendations captured in the review include more research, monitoring and evaluation (including developing metrics), promoting benefits, capacity building and making outputs more audience-friendly.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/3/46open scienceopen accessopen dataeconomic impacts
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael J. Fell
spellingShingle Michael J. Fell
The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment
Publications
open science
open access
open data
economic impacts
author_facet Michael J. Fell
author_sort Michael J. Fell
title The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment
title_short The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment
title_full The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment
title_fullStr The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment
title_full_unstemmed The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment
title_sort economic impacts of open science: a rapid evidence assessment
publisher MDPI AG
series Publications
issn 2304-6775
publishDate 2019-07-01
description A common motivation for increasing open access to research findings and data is the potential to create economic benefits—but evidence is patchy and diverse. This study systematically reviewed the evidence on what kinds of economic impacts (positive and negative) open science can have, how these comes about, and how benefits could be maximized. Use of open science outputs often leaves no obvious trace, so most evidence of impacts is based on interviews, surveys, inference based on existing costs, and modelling approaches. There is indicative evidence that open access to findings/data can lead to savings in access costs, labour costs and transaction costs. There are examples of open science enabling new products, services, companies, research and collaborations. Modelling studies suggest higher returns to R&D if open access permits greater accessibility and efficiency of use of findings. Barriers include lack of skills capacity in search, interpretation and text mining, and lack of clarity around where benefits accrue. There are also contextual considerations around who benefits most from open science (e.g., sectors, small vs. larger companies, types of dataset). Recommendations captured in the review include more research, monitoring and evaluation (including developing metrics), promoting benefits, capacity building and making outputs more audience-friendly.
topic open science
open access
open data
economic impacts
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/3/46
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeljfell theeconomicimpactsofopensciencearapidevidenceassessment
AT michaeljfell economicimpactsofopensciencearapidevidenceassessment
_version_ 1725950459815919616