Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire

Background There are currently no tools for assessing claimants’ perceived fairness in work disability evaluations. In our study, we describe the development and validation of a questionnaire for this purpose. Method In cooperation with subject-matter experts of Swiss insurance medicine, we develope...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Regine Lohss, Timm Rosburg, Monica Bachmann, Brigitte Walter Meyer, Wout de Boer, Katrin Fischer, Regina Kunz, Melita J. Giummarra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7498050/?tool=EBI
id doaj-7484ede889904e36a709ada2d5608d74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7484ede889904e36a709ada2d5608d742020-11-25T02:37:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness QuestionnaireRegine LohssTimm RosburgMonica BachmannBrigitte Walter MeyerWout de BoerKatrin FischerRegina KunzMelita J. GiummarraBackground There are currently no tools for assessing claimants’ perceived fairness in work disability evaluations. In our study, we describe the development and validation of a questionnaire for this purpose. Method In cooperation with subject-matter experts of Swiss insurance medicine, we developed the 30-item Basel Fairness Questionnaire (BFQ). Claimants anonymously answered the questionnaire immediately after their disability evaluation, still unaware about its outcome. For each item, there were four response options, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”. The construct validity of the BFQ was assessed by running a principal component analysis (PCA). Results In 4% of the questionnaires, the claimants’ perception on the disability evaluation was negative (below the median of the scale). The PCA of the items responses followed by an orthogonal rotation revealed four factors, namely (1) Interviewing Skills, (2) Rapport, (3) Transparency, and (4) Case Familiarity, explaining 63.5% of the total variance. Discussion The ratings presumably have some positive bias by sample selection and response bias. The PCA factors corresponded to dimensions that subject-matter experts had beforehand identified as relevant. However, all item ratings were highly intercorrelated, which suggests that the presumed underlying dimensions are not independent. Conclusion The BFQ represents the first self-administered instrument for measuring claimants’ perceived fairness of work disability evaluations, allowing the assessment of informational, procedural, and interactive justice from the perspective of claimants. In cooperation with Swiss assessment centres, we plan to implement a refined version of the BFQ as feedback instrument in work disability evaluations.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7498050/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Regine Lohss
Timm Rosburg
Monica Bachmann
Brigitte Walter Meyer
Wout de Boer
Katrin Fischer
Regina Kunz
Melita J. Giummarra
spellingShingle Regine Lohss
Timm Rosburg
Monica Bachmann
Brigitte Walter Meyer
Wout de Boer
Katrin Fischer
Regina Kunz
Melita J. Giummarra
Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire
PLoS ONE
author_facet Regine Lohss
Timm Rosburg
Monica Bachmann
Brigitte Walter Meyer
Wout de Boer
Katrin Fischer
Regina Kunz
Melita J. Giummarra
author_sort Regine Lohss
title Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire
title_short Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire
title_full Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire
title_fullStr Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: Development and validation of the Basel Fairness Questionnaire
title_sort perceived fairness of claimants undergoing a work disability evaluation: development and validation of the basel fairness questionnaire
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background There are currently no tools for assessing claimants’ perceived fairness in work disability evaluations. In our study, we describe the development and validation of a questionnaire for this purpose. Method In cooperation with subject-matter experts of Swiss insurance medicine, we developed the 30-item Basel Fairness Questionnaire (BFQ). Claimants anonymously answered the questionnaire immediately after their disability evaluation, still unaware about its outcome. For each item, there were four response options, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”. The construct validity of the BFQ was assessed by running a principal component analysis (PCA). Results In 4% of the questionnaires, the claimants’ perception on the disability evaluation was negative (below the median of the scale). The PCA of the items responses followed by an orthogonal rotation revealed four factors, namely (1) Interviewing Skills, (2) Rapport, (3) Transparency, and (4) Case Familiarity, explaining 63.5% of the total variance. Discussion The ratings presumably have some positive bias by sample selection and response bias. The PCA factors corresponded to dimensions that subject-matter experts had beforehand identified as relevant. However, all item ratings were highly intercorrelated, which suggests that the presumed underlying dimensions are not independent. Conclusion The BFQ represents the first self-administered instrument for measuring claimants’ perceived fairness of work disability evaluations, allowing the assessment of informational, procedural, and interactive justice from the perspective of claimants. In cooperation with Swiss assessment centres, we plan to implement a refined version of the BFQ as feedback instrument in work disability evaluations.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7498050/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT reginelohss perceivedfairnessofclaimantsundergoingaworkdisabilityevaluationdevelopmentandvalidationofthebaselfairnessquestionnaire
AT timmrosburg perceivedfairnessofclaimantsundergoingaworkdisabilityevaluationdevelopmentandvalidationofthebaselfairnessquestionnaire
AT monicabachmann perceivedfairnessofclaimantsundergoingaworkdisabilityevaluationdevelopmentandvalidationofthebaselfairnessquestionnaire
AT brigittewaltermeyer perceivedfairnessofclaimantsundergoingaworkdisabilityevaluationdevelopmentandvalidationofthebaselfairnessquestionnaire
AT woutdeboer perceivedfairnessofclaimantsundergoingaworkdisabilityevaluationdevelopmentandvalidationofthebaselfairnessquestionnaire
AT katrinfischer perceivedfairnessofclaimantsundergoingaworkdisabilityevaluationdevelopmentandvalidationofthebaselfairnessquestionnaire
AT reginakunz perceivedfairnessofclaimantsundergoingaworkdisabilityevaluationdevelopmentandvalidationofthebaselfairnessquestionnaire
AT melitajgiummarra perceivedfairnessofclaimantsundergoingaworkdisabilityevaluationdevelopmentandvalidationofthebaselfairnessquestionnaire
_version_ 1724794232599740416